- Joined
- 4 May 2008
- Posts
- 52
- Reactions
- 0
you will need to pay 10c an option to convert them to shares.
They expire in late September this year.
At the moment they are trading at a discount to the full share price so if you intend to buy and hold go for options.
Can you explain more about the benefit of buying option than share??? I would like to buy some and keep until sept/2008.
Thanks
Thanks Cc But can you tell me why would the directors sell their shares to buy less options than they had ordinary shares?
I might be wrong but I think one of them sold 5,900,000 shares and purchased
6,769,969 options.
This would have been done to aquire a bigger slice of the pie once excised and to give confidence to the market.
he wouldn't be buying options at .12 if he wasn't confident the share price would hold or increase before September.
Some of the guys on HC believe it's a sign of good things to come.
The more options that are bought and excised the more confidence the market gets.
For example I hold options which are going to cost me .10 the excise, well if Flinders find nothing or very little or if the quality is crap the share price will tumble.
Now if it tumbles chances are it'll go below .10 and if that happens nobody would excise there options are they will become worthless.
The fact that directors and the investers are buying them and they are now being excised mean there is confidence that Flinders will find something of value.
No guarantees but confidence is building.
Thanks I get the picture now. By the way I have also been told that fortescue have given permission to Flinders to use their railway when and if they go into production.
Am surprised the sale of shares to acquire options is a positive sign. If the entire amount received from the sale of shares was used to purchase options, then I would agree. With the figures quoted above, selling 5.9 millions shares would have surely enabled the director to buy more options than what was acquired.
Wouldn't the fact that not all the monies from the sale of shares was used to acquire options be a negative sign, i.e. the director is reducing his exposure to the company and not increasing it even though in quantity it might appear to have increased but in $$ terms it hasn't. Could this not be a sign that result are not expected to live up to expectation and there is potential for share price to fall?
I don't know much about shares vs options but it just seems logical. Please DYOR. I have heard so many good things about this company and I hate to say anything negative. Just questiing the logic behind the quote.
personally, i think if FMS really discovers x amount of iron ore and produce y amount of iron ore... as a current minute shareholder, i would treat this coy as a potential take over target...
I think the size market cap these guys have is totally ridiculous and way out of proportion.
> $250 mill for a target, when there are producers earning profits, from various other minerals, that are under $50 mill.
Or IO projects that will be in production by years end that are capped at under $50 mill also.
Once again just goes to show that sentiment is more important in markets these days than actual underlying value. The joys of anyone being able to jump on board due to the Internet i guess...
down to 20c Why would you sell now when drilling has commenced?
down to 20c Why would you sell now when drilling has commenced?
Maybe a bit of market manipulation or am i just paranoid.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?