- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,144
- Reactions
- 12,779
The only solution I can see requires a broad reset. Throw out most of the ideological stuff, focus on real efficiency instead of theoretical stuff, and end the practice of taking with one hand and simultaneously giving to the exact same people with the other.
A big mistake which has been made over the past 30 years is to equate moving something off the government’s books with small government.
If you take something that’s done by a team of say 500 workers actually doing the physical work and outsource it to a contractor at what ends up being triple the price then that’s an increase in the size of government not a decrease. You might have 500 fewer workers on the books but the tax which needs to be collected has gone up not down if the overall cost is higher.
Power prices are the real killer (followed by insurance) . The ideological stuff you mentioned is that the private sector can do a better job of delivering services like these to consumers. I think that ideology has been showed to be not necessarily applicable considering the rise in prices since privatisation of the power industry.
Well worth highlighting. The mantra of small government has been a smokescreen to sell effective government or semi government operations to business and effectively destroy an effective competitor.
No worries and no need to apologise to me. I was quick cranky myself when I posted. I am very cranky about a lot of things recently. Really angry. It's a terrible tragic summer, not just for the people who have lost lives, homes and a living but an ecological catastrophe is unfolding on the eastern side of the continent this summer.My apologies for the "tone" of that comment.
Whilst I don't agree with the point I was responding to, I could have expressed it a bit more politely than that I think.
My apologies to tinhat.
I was trying to work out what sort of machinery?Just to add about the product I am buying. It was originally invented and made in Australia (Tasmania I think). Chinese must have bought it out.
Tasmanian patented sixth toe removal machineI was trying to work out what sort of machinery?
Then I remembered that most things invented here are now in foreign hands....
Tasmanian patented sixth toe removal machine
I don't want to mention it on here as I'll test the waters on sales and try and make some coin.
It's amazing how many have sold to China. Everyone cashed in.It's why Blundstone went offshore
Poor local sales
100% agree with this. I for one would rather buy German, USA or Japanese quality tools that last 1-2 lifetimes than junk chinese made tools that last 1-2 years.Bunnings has a lot of junk in it,
I'm the same because I hate sending stuff to landfill when it has a lot of embedded energy in it. But it is horses for courses for me. I seem to be a bit hard on my electrical tools. When you are grinding or cutting you just want to get the job done. Regardless of the brand I tend to go through the small angle grinders and I don't find any difference between a cheap $35 ozito and something three times the price. Same with the ozito 1600W rotary hammer drill. Does as good a job as any other far more expensive brand.100% agree with this. I for one would rather buy German, USA or Japanese quality tools that last 1-2 lifetimes than junk chinese made tools that last 1-2 years.
Aldi and Costco breathing easier?German hypermarket Kaufland says it will make an "orderly withdrawal" from the Australian market to focus on its European investments in another blow to the struggling retail sector.
In a fresh indictment of the dire retail landscape, the $170 billion retailer revealed on Wednesday it had made the decision after "careful and thoughtful consideration".
Aldi and Costco breathing easier?
The real concern isn’t so much that they’re not going to be operating in Australia but that they’ve completely changed their mind, going from expansion to a complete pull out, at the same time numerous other retail and similar businesses are also closing or at least downsizing.Too much competition in the supermarket sector. Even though Kaufland is out-of-pocket around half a billion dollars, they have probably saved themselves further operating losses down the track.
Ah, the power of incumbency. Kaufland were looking to open with a bang (blitz?); the operation had hired up to 200, including Woolies and Coles middle management, sent many to Germany for training for up to 6 months, scoped out up to 23 sites for their big boxes (5000sq.m. or double the average size supermarket) and turned the sod on the distribution centre outside Melbourne. The amount, as reported, has been $500+ million. And a lot of that was in planning, talking to councils, getting DAs, lining up suppliers and the like.The real concern isn’t so much that they’re not going to be operating in Australia but that they’ve completely changed their mind, going from expansion to a complete pull out...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?