Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Recovery or Dead Cat Bounce?

When does a bear rally, bounce, sideways trend, continued upward trend become a market correction?
Just like to know, being a market novice.

It is pretty apparent to me global markets were all in a downward trend for the last 18 months, even though some spikes were seen, trend was clearly downward by a pretty rapid level, which of course we all know now.

So here we are , having dipped to March Low, and now we have had 3 months of upward movement, with some downward spikes..and now pretty much on a crab movement until direction is given from somewhere or something.
How many months of this trend would it take for the word "recovery" to be mooted?

If for example, we stayed in this pattern for the rest of the year, sideways with some ups and downs, but found ourselves on a S & P 500 index of 1000 ish, DJIA 9700 ish, FTSE 5000 ish, XJO 4300 ish, when would the date be named as the market correction or the end of the bear market?
April, May, June, July, August.....later ??
Or would it still be a bear market in denial?

Just interested... I clearly see the global financial clock on about 6.30 to 7, to me ,the worst is behind for this crisis, however my view is not what I would like discussed, I really would also like to know when was this current bear market officially called in 2007 and how long had the downward trend been in place since the high for the experts ( and there sure seems like a lot of those have gone quiet lately) to call the beginning of the bear market.

I find after reading many posts, articles and papers, that many people are all very very reluctant to admit that what we are seeing may be the first signs of sustained improvment ( no matter how small or light) in the global economy. There are clear indicators becoming apparent, whilst the fundementals of the problems have not totally vanished of course, they are being worked on and there are clear indicators of an end to this global recession by Q3/4 this year.
If this is true, and signs of sustained improvement( no matter how small) are proven by the release of figures, then the markets will react to this in an upwards movement..

So based on that assumption playing out for the remainder of this year,and going into 2010 with real improving figures and also barring no black swan events, when will the call be made that will be looked back through history, of the date of the market correction..

Its the exact opposite to events through late 07, 08 in my novice eyes...and if that proves to be true then only history will show us a date when the call was made.

wheep0
 
When does a bear rally, bounce, sideways trend, continued upward trend become a market correction?
Just like to know, being a market novice.
Draw a line in the upward trend of a long term semilog chart to see where we sit.

It should make it clearer to where we are in the cycle, unless the system has broken down.
 
I really would also like to know when was this current bear market officially called in 2007 and how long had the downward trend been in place since the high for the experts ( and there sure seems like a lot of those have gone quiet lately) to call the beginning of the bear market.

Depend which experts Wheepo.

Most talking heads were saying stronger for longer all through 07 into 08 then called a bear end of 08 and still calling it?

Bottom line is they are backwards looking like most here.
 
Depend which experts Wheepo.

most talking heads where saying stronger for longer all through 07 into 08 then called a bear end of 08 and still calling it?

Bottom line is they are backwards looking like most here.

Cheers,
But what was the date/ month, that looking back through history in 10 years time, was the time of correction that was widely accepted as the transition from the last bull to the current bear ?

wheep0
 
Cheers,
But what was the date/ month, that looking back through history in 10 years time, was the time of correction that was widely accepted as the transition from the last bull to the current bear ?

wheep0

Sorry wheepo "they" don't have a central agency that declares "a bear".

But as soon as we get a 20% fall in the major indexes the fools call it an official bear but by then its a useless call.
 
Sorry wheepo "they" don't have a central agency that declares "a bear".
There are some general numbers on a bear aren't there, TH?

Like a 'recession', or a 'deperession', or a 'correction'.

All terms that have an approximate general roundabout proximity.

The overall capitalist system hasn't fallen over yet, from what I've seen. And the market is an intergral part of that, so I am going to stick by long term trends and emotional psychology.
 
Down trends have to reverse sometime.... the historical norm for the stock market is an up-trend rather than a down-trend.So it is inevitable that at some point a down trend will reverse.

Well no, it's not inevitable......up trends paid for by debt have to reverse too some day, using the same logic?

If we are talking trends and reversals, we are now in a trend reversal of generational proportions. We can talk about the tags given to minor bumps along the way, but in this time scale the down trend has only just started, if only because parabolic trends are simply unsustainable?

For all those born after 1950 or so then it would be easy to assume that 'things' always revert to trend ie markets go up, but it has come at a cumulative cost that has to one day either be repaid, inflated away or defaulted apon. Up till now the first 2 options have been enough to sate the debtors at the door and satisfy the consumers debt financed consumption. (Funny that 1971 keeps popping up as the turning point for a parabolic rise in unrestrained credit growth/debt excess???)

Interesting (parabolic exhaustion?) charts from the Fed themselves - the big problem for them, and us, is that the expenses are greater than the incomes ie deficit. GDP growth required to fund these debts will have to be greater than, or a minimum of, 4.5% for the next several years, if not decades? Right now debt is still ballooning out of control and tax receipts are falling just as sharply. China is busy spending their accumulated reserves of US dollars on hard assets before they become worthless.

Yes, the world has gone parabolic, we now have to pay for it?
 

Attachments

  • US debt crimes.jpg
    US debt crimes.jpg
    139.9 KB · Views: 17
The shape of the graphs is of course dependant on the vertical scale used.

How do they look on a log10 scale ?
 
Here is a point on liquidity worth thinking over. Link here.

Bottom line: Reviewing the evidence to date, we conclude that the new global liquidity cycle, which started late last year, is alive and kicking. Excess liquidity has surged, asset markets have rallied, the global economy looks set to bottom out, fears of lasting deflation have been dispelled, and inflation risks are on the rise. With quantitative easing still in full swing and the economic recovery in 2H09 expected to be rather anaemic, we believe that there is no early end in sight for this liquidity cycle.

** this probably provides an answer to the current rallying market, until the end of liquidity cycle is in sight, or until you begin to read about Bernanke and Tim Geithner expressing some kind of QE easing! And that doesn't seem to be any time soon.

A direct consequence of such action is to see the decline in the US$ and this probably explains why Tim G is in China talking to the Chinese - he wants them to help to keep the value of US$ steady, as in opinion expressed here.

Assuming the view expressed is spot on, I think there is a fair chance that the US$ might see a boost in its value due to some "unofficial" agreement between the USA, China and Japan. Those who have large bet on the US$ should keep an eye on Tim Geithner and his Chinese counterpart.
 
Well no, it's not inevitable......up trends paid for by debt have to reverse too some day, using the same logic?

If we are talking trends and reversals, we are now in a trend reversal of generational proportions. We can talk about the tags given to minor bumps along the way, but in this time scale the down trend has only just started, if only because parabolic trends are simply unsustainable?

For all those born after 1950 or so then it would be easy to assume that 'things' always revert to trend ie markets go up, but it has come at a cumulative cost that has to one day either be repaid, inflated away or defaulted apon. Up till now the first 2 options have been enough to sate the debtors at the door and satisfy the consumers debt financed consumption. (Funny that 1971 keeps popping up as the turning point for a parabolic rise in unrestrained credit growth/debt excess???)

Interesting (parabolic exhaustion?) charts from the Fed themselves - the big problem for them, and us, is that the expenses are greater than the incomes ie deficit. GDP growth required to fund these debts will have to be greater than, or a minimum of, 4.5% for the next several years, if not decades? Right now debt is still ballooning out of control and tax receipts are falling just as sharply. China is busy spending their accumulated reserves of US dollars on hard assets before they become worthless.

Yes, the world has gone parabolic, we now have to pay for it?

Have a look at the Crash Course in Economics, Wheepo, it's worth a look. Quite a few charts that are exponential much like those above.
 
Well no, it's not inevitable......up trends paid for by debt have to reverse too some day, using the same logic?

If we are talking trends and reversals, we are now in a trend reversal of generational proportions. We can talk about the tags given to minor bumps along the way, but in this time scale the down trend has only just started, if only because parabolic trends are simply unsustainable?

For all those born after 1950 or so then it would be easy to assume that 'things' always revert to trend ie markets go up, but it has come at a cumulative cost that has to one day either be repaid, inflated away or defaulted apon. Up till now the first 2 options have been enough to sate the debtors at the door and satisfy the consumers debt financed consumption. (Funny that 1971 keeps popping up as the turning point for a parabolic rise in unrestrained credit growth/debt excess???)

Interesting (parabolic exhaustion?) charts from the Fed themselves - the big problem for them, and us, is that the expenses are greater than the incomes ie deficit. GDP growth required to fund these debts will have to be greater than, or a minimum of, 4.5% for the next several years, if not decades? Right now debt is still ballooning out of control and tax receipts are falling just as sharply. China is busy spending their accumulated reserves of US dollars on hard assets before they become worthless.

Yes, the world has gone parabolic, we now have to pay for it?

.................................................................................................

So I guess you are on a long term short/sell commodities, top up the gold and tinned food strategy for the rest of your trading days then.
GDP Growth will climb back, you are calling this view based on the bottom of the worst bear and financial crisis in 70 years with the fallout and figures associated with it..
Im sorry but I find it hard to accept , maybe im thick though, however you are over thinking and over dramatising the state of the world based on the worst figures seen for nearly a century and saying they will never improve to pay down these debts. Maybe a time will come again on this planet that the tomorrows`s will never be the same as the yesterdays, however that is certainly not now..

My view, just wish I had doubled my long term buys in Feb !
wheep0
 
Well no, it's not inevitable......up trends paid for by debt have to reverse too some day, using the same logic?

If we are talking trends and reversals, we are now in a trend reversal of generational proportions. We can talk about the tags given to minor bumps along the way, but in this time scale the down trend has only just started, if only because parabolic trends are simply unsustainable?

For all those born after 1950 or so then it would be easy to assume that 'things' always revert to trend ie markets go up, but it has come at a cumulative cost that has to one day either be repaid, inflated away or defaulted apon. Up till now the first 2 options have been enough to sate the debtors at the door and satisfy the consumers debt financed consumption. (Funny that 1971 keeps popping up as the turning point for a parabolic rise in unrestrained credit growth/debt excess???)

Interesting (parabolic exhaustion?) charts from the Fed themselves - the big problem for them, and us, is that the expenses are greater than the incomes ie deficit. GDP growth required to fund these debts will have to be greater than, or a minimum of, 4.5% for the next several years, if not decades? Right now debt is still ballooning out of control and tax receipts are falling just as sharply. China is busy spending their accumulated reserves of US dollars on hard assets before they become worthless.

Yes, the world has gone parabolic, we now have to pay for it?

.................................................................................................

So I guess you are on a long term short/sell commodities, top up the gold and tinned food strategy for the rest of your trading days then.
GDP Growth will climb back, you are calling this view based on the bottom of the worst bear and financial crisis in 70 years with the fallout and figures associated with it..
Im sorry but I find it hard to accept , maybe im thick though, however you are over thinking and over dramatising the state of the world based on the worst figures seen for nearly a century and saying they will never improve to pay down these debts. Maybe a time will come again on this planet that the tomorrows`s will never be the same as the yesterdays, however that is certainly not now..

My view, just wish I had doubled my long term buys in Feb !
wheep0

You raise some great points Wheep0.

Do you think people are piling into US equities because the bear trend has broken or because they will provide a better yield than US treasuries?
 
You raise some great points Wheep0.

Do you think people are piling into US equities because the bear trend has broken or because they will provide a better yield than US treasuries?

Not sure , yanks are surfing a pretty big wave of hope just now,thats for sure. GM`s confirmed bankruptcy is closure, akin to fearing the worst without admission but then having the proof in front of you a loved one`s death...
Is it the last bit of closure that is required ? not sure..
If the wave of hope, falls into a wave of genuine improving numbers , then for me this will lead to the end of this bear market..

However im a bull, very long and have no part of my persona aligned with negativity and backwardness.

One thing is sure, we are certainly acutely nearer to the end of this bear market than we are to the beginning of it..

wheep0
 
The shape of the graphs is of course dependant on the vertical scale used.

How do they look on a log10 scale ?

Yes what he said! :) I notice that all these uber-bear/Austrian school/monetarist type views - you know, the ones that always go on about doom and gloom and show us fancy charts with exponential up trends etc? Well they always use linear instead of log axis on their fancy graphs. Why? Well it looks good to people that don't actually understand maths I suppose, or who don't get the fact that the worlds population has grown exponentially for the past few thousand years as well...... Maybe one day that will stop, but until population growth globally stops looking exponential, and even then until close to 100% of the worlds population have the equivalent living standards to the developed/western world, then I think most economic indicators, including money supply growth, credit, GDP, trade, government income/expenditure etc etc can continue to grow in a commensurate manner, over the long term anyway, with the odd hiccup here and there of course as we have just seen (and are still seeing!).

The only thing that will stop it ultimately are environmental factors and/or dependence on scarce resources which run out. The latter worries me less than the former, as innovation IMO will always ensure that we can replace the use of one scarce resource as it runs out with another abundant or even a renewable one. Either way I don't think we are at a point yet with either is really yet a show stopper issue, so I fully expect global economic growth to recover over the next couple of years from the current credit crisis sparked recession, and continue on it's merry way for some time to come - and I am invested accordingly, with plenty left in reserve to take opportunities as they arise.

My 2c worth anyway.

And on this:

Have a look at the Crash Course in Economics, Wheepo, it's worth a look. Quite a few charts that are exponential much like those above.

I have watched that series - while it contains some interesting information and examples, I also find it quite misleading in other area's and downright loony/almost conspiratorial in the some area's as well. I always say be careful what you read on the internet, because any crackpot can create a blog, garner a following and suddenly appear to have credibility! :D I'm sure there's a reason they don't teach that "Crash course" in the economics schools at all the main universities.....

Cheers,

Beej
 
Here is a point on liquidity worth thinking over. Link here.

Interesting couple of links there, thanks for that.

Picking a quote from the Morgan Stanley Analysis, that seems relevant

Morgan Stanley Analysis see link above said:
Risky assets such as equities, credit and commodities have rallied over the past few months as excess liquidity has surged. The ‘wall of money' has dominated the (justified) concerns about the outlook for corporate earnings and the implications of deleveraging in the financial sector and the private household sector. Whether the rally in risky assets can continue remains to be seen - our European and US equity strategists are cautious and our EM equity strategist Jonathan Garner has become less bullish recently. In any case, our analysis suggests that there is plenty of liquidity around - and more coming - to support asset prices.

I think it's time to answer the question "Recovery or Dead Cat Bounce", it's neither, it is gradually morphing into a "bull run"... let's see where the bull can take us. S&P broke through 930, earlier tonight.... interesting... 10,000 Dow next?

Having said all that, the inevitable pull back will come, just a matter of when..

Regards
Ray
 
Some big big moves on the US tonight, BIDU is up about 18% as I type. Bear must be out to lunch. Some good profits going long. Shame I get too tired to stay up for more then a few hours.
 
II think it's time to answer the question "Recovery or Dead Cat Bounce", it's neither, it is gradually morphing into a "bull run"...

This is a liquidity driven rally, so objectively, it lacks fundamental strength to be sustainable. While the US markets are rallying with stock prices being run up, there's a wider discount on going behind the scene - the depreciation in the US$.

Here is a news that probably should sound an alarm bell to us all. It is saying the "market" is putting(forcing) a brake on to QE. Bernanke and TimG will be facing the music sooner than later, and learn that there is no free lunch in this world. Not even when you are the world's greatest fed banker!

A lot will depend on what's agreed between TimG and the Chinese and it won't be too long before we find out. Meanwhile enjoy the rally while it lasts, but if my "gut feeling" is right, this should be the last leg of the rally. The bear I think is lurking not too far behind.
 
Maybe if you changed the scale on this chart it would turn into a surplus too ;)

Meanwhile, back in anti bizarro bond world.......rising yeilds......again

Globally, $6trillion minimum needs to be funded for stimulis/bailout schemes either by bonds or QE ie printing money, and the creditors would like a better rate of return to account for the falling exchange rate. I wonder what interest rate was factored into the various deficit calcs?

Foreign investors in the US are still underwater due to the exchange rate so if there is the slighest hint of a faulter in this dead cat bounce then there could be another swift sharp sell off? Getting irrational again?

Since the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) last issued its baseline projections in January 2009, the outlook for the budget deficit has deteriorated further. Enactment of stimulus legislation and omnibus appropriations, a worsening of the economic outlook, and other factors have increased CBO’s projections of the deficit by more than $400 billion in both 2009 and 2010 and by smaller amounts thereafter. As a result, if current policies remain the same, CBO now anticipates that the deficit will total almost $1.667 trillion

And the main point from the previous post link article -

The U.S. Treasury must sell a record net $2 trillion in new debt in 2009 to fund a $1.8 trillion projected fiscal deficit, resulting from falling tax revenues, an economic stimulus package and sundry bank bailouts.
 

Attachments

  • budgetdeficit15-640.png
    budgetdeficit15-640.png
    59.9 KB · Views: 129
  • us10yrbond.jpg
    us10yrbond.jpg
    29.8 KB · Views: 130
Top