Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,843
- Reactions
- 10,681
Sorry for the delayed response.Dingo, Banana, Alligator Creek, Quilpie, Augathella, Karumba.
Sorry for the delayed response.
To which Alligator Ck. do you refer? There’s a fair few of them.
Sorry for the delayed response.
Presently just checking out of the Presidential Suite at the Bowen River Hotel.
To which Alligator Ck. do you refer? There’s a fair few of them.
gg
My doctor said that rapid antigen tests are useful but wouldn’t work as a border measure. She said it is complicated and not exact enough given the large number of Crusties from Byron on the one hand and on the other Very Rich Diseased Persons trying to flee Sydney and Melbourne for Qld.On a more serious note, rapid antigen tests could be used for anyone wanting to cross borders.
NSW is presently using them to supplement PCR testing.
These have been around for a long time and why we are so far behind in using them is a mystery.
They are not perfect, but given a high percentage of the QLD/NSW border crossings would be "essential work" related for the Coolangatta Tweed region the chance of spread would be minimal and limited.
More importantly RAT tests could be applied to transport workers who continue to cross borders without restriction or testing. Apparently these people are immune from covid!
Specificity of the better RAT tests approximates 99.9% so you might miss one in a thousand. However, with border testing on a daily basis the odds of a person being missed on the second crossing become negligible.My doctor said that rapid antigen tests are useful but wouldn’t work as a border measure. She said it is complicated and not exact enough given the large number of Crusties from Byron on the one hand and on the other Very Rich Diseased Persons trying to flee Sydney and Melbourne for Qld.
So as a supplement to the proper test it is ok but if you want to keep people out until your own people are vaccinated it is probably not useful.
gg
published 12 Aug 2021.... an Uncorrected Proof.Specificity of the better RAT tests approximates 99.9% so you might miss one in a thousand. However, with border testing on a daily basis the odds of a person being missed on the second crossing become negligible.
The research findings on each RAT were at figure 1 and will not change as they were based on information from the linked website, which explains everything more simply.published 12 Aug 2021.... an Uncorrected Proof.
So wow. stop everything.
These are the type of people Queensland is keeping out by insisting on individual checks not antigen testing.Specificity of the better RAT tests approximates 99.9% so you might miss one in a thousand. However, with border testing on a daily basis the odds of a person being missed on the second crossing become negligible.
In any case, isn't it better to test everyone crossing rather than continuing to allow discretionary untested exemptions?
And, given the very low risk from amongst those tested, we get a more functional economy.
That would only be the case if every person was covid positive to begin with, and we know that is not so.These are the type of people Queensland is keeping out by insisting on individual checks not antigen testing.
A mob from Byron and Mullumbimby in this report with no social conscience.
I believe 4000 people were turned back some days ago with inadequate documentation at our border on the Pacific Highway.
So missing 1/1000 in 1 week = 30 possible nincompoops entering Queensland.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-18/security-guards-byron-post-office-covid-check-ins/100386262
gg
Thanks @rederob .That would only be the case if every person was covid positive to begin with, and we know that is not so.
Lets assume there were actually 35 positive cases that tried to sneak across over a week and they were among 5000 tested each day.
That works out as one positive case per thousand crossings, per week.
So that one person in a thousand would be caught 999 days in every thousand.
These are the type of people Queensland is keeping out by insisting on individual checks not antigen testing.
A mob from Byron and Mullumbimby in this report with no social conscience.
I believe 4000 people were turned back some days ago with inadequate documentation at our border on the Pacific Highway.
So missing 1/1000 in 1 week = 30 possible nincompoops entering Queensland.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-18/security-guards-byron-post-office-covid-check-ins/100386262
gg
I get it.Thanks @rederob .
I am aware of that. I just thought this thread had so much fake news in it I'd add a bit of my own.
gg
Without casting any aspersions on the motley crew who inhabit Byron and its environs, there are crusties, vax deniers, chefs, movie stars, maddies, financial advisers and baddies living there in larger percentages than anywhere else in Australia.i was SHOCKED the Post Office had enough customers to be worried about ... but then i saw the signs about the bank agencies they have
IN WHICH case i would be more worried about MASKED individuals ( nice and handy to escape across the state border too )
Australia Post is obviously missing the guidance from Ms. Holgate
I guess it depends on which side of the border you are looking at it from.I get it.
What I don't get is why there are so many cross border exemptions who are never tested, when a RAT testing regime on every crossing would catch almost every case and keep borders open.
I am in favour of many aspects of mitigation but we should be combining them with technology so that our economy can continue to be reasonably functional.
For example, would you rather catch a flight where everyone was double vaccinated (ie. with a vaccine passport) but not tested, or one where everyone had tested negative albeit with a very slim chance you were sitting next to someone who a false negative?
As matters stand the only way we know for sure we are negative if is we have a PCR test. While they are more accurate, they are not that convenient. Regular RAT testing of large slabs of the population could be carried out reasonably conveniently and actually catch more cases than PCR testing, and catch them earlier.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?