- Joined
- 3 May 2019
- Posts
- 6,324
- Reactions
- 9,992
These figures are to take with a bit of caution as i am not sure i recorded all dividends/distributions for either systems or discretionary.So the half FY summary for the portfolio:
XNT went from 73450 on the 1/07/2022 to close today at 80182 so a great return of 9.2%
For my systems:
we got these:
daily asx volatility +4k or +7.7% for the half year, below XNT but with far less exposure
daily US volatility +0.8k or +4.7% for the half year, below XNT but with far less exposure and much better than the US market
Weekly:
MOA:a loss of 1.6k or -2.8% bad..well below XNT
View attachment 151059
VWMA started on the 11/11 and was just active 2 weeks where it lost 1.6k or 1.6%
View attachment 151060
Obelix had more of a wild ride: lost 710$ or 2.2% loss as it kept being quite conservative:
View attachment 151061
We closed during the FY the QFSec which did lose $10.6k or 11%,BO weekly stopped after 3.6k or 10% loss and wrong data detected
lastly Pete BB was stopped after only engaging 2 weeks in this FY and losing $1.5k or
So these are pretty bad results:
losing on the half year $14.8k
This was compensated by a 22k+ gain on the discretionary to end up positive but not by much
Let's see how the second half goes
Good evening qldfrogThese figures are to take with a bit of caution as i am not sure i recorded all dividends/distributions for either systems or discretionary.
So real results could be slightly better , but we are roughly flat + in term of % assets , whereas the xnt went quite well.
The xnt matched inflation.
My portfolio did not.
I was born in Champagne country, so bubly it was for me 3 glasses so far?Good evening qldfrog
get a rum into ya... Alcohol fixes everything ha ha ha ha ha
Happy New Year
Kind regards
rcw1
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?