- Joined
- 14 March 2006
- Posts
- 3,630
- Reactions
- 5
Crikey, Grigor likes this:
on 12 Jan:
http://perseus.auroracms.com/aurora/assets/user_content/File/BGF Equities Research PRU Jan 09.pdf
That was before the resource upgrade.
Then, in regard to Tengrela:
Tengrela is the Next Multi-Million Ounce Project
In addition to the Ghana projects, PRU is in the early
stages of assessing what appears to be another multimillion
ounce gold opportunity in the Ivory Coast. The
Tengrela Project covers a 5.6 km mineralised system with
three main zones having been drilled so far. Gold is
associated with quartz veining and alteration within a
porphyry style system that has recently returned huge
intercepts that include 142m at 1.8 gpt (including 68 m at
2.7 gpt from a depth of 76m) and 105m at 1.9 gpt
(including 77m at 2.4 gpt from 54m). The grade of the
system is generally 1.5 to 2 gpt, but there are also
bonanza grade zones.
The first resource statement was made on 27 November
2008, quoting 970,000 oz at a grade of 1.9 gpt (15.7 mt at
1.9 gpt). This included a high-grade component of 5.1 mt
at 3.1 gpt, for 500,000 oz (indicated and inferred).
This resource was calculated from only 1 km of a 5.6 km
strike on the Sissingue prospect. Broad spaced drilling
has been conducted over a 4 km strike with width up to
750m.
Metallurgical test work has shown high gold recoveries
from free milling ore in the oxide and primary zones. A
scoping study is expected within a month or two.
Not sure what you exactly mean GL. You mean instability in Kyrg because US pull out, or because of Manas? LOL. I assume just because of the US. I have no idea. Is there some policical problems there? Russia about to take them back now?Kennas
Do you think there could be any geo-political instability now that PRU have divested their stake in Manas and the US are pulling out of Kyrgzstan?
Not sure what you exactly mean GL. You mean instability in Kyrg because US pull out, or because of Manas? LOL. I assume just because of the US. I have no idea. Is there some policical problems there? Russia about to take them back now?Not sure how much losing Manas would mean to PRU now really.
Well 'Manas' is the actual name of the US Base in Kyrgyzstan? But they will be leaving the country very soon!
I'm just thinking of sovereign risk and how the market may interpret that? :dunno:
Tengrela SS out and this is paying for itself after a couple of years simlar to the other thing.
NPV of $130m just on this which was it's entire MC a few weeks ago. Add in the main event and if POGs staying around SS perameter levels all looks good.
On this and their other thing they're projecting 300m oz au pa, with Capex repaid after 2 years.
Nice little add on perhaps. No wonder there's talk.
Happy for NCM or LGL to pick them up...
Well PRU just put out a clarification ann about production yadi yada no biggie...but something I did notice down the side was the pending (and quite big) ann's to be made in the coming quarter:
Ghana 5.6m oz - Resource Upgrade Q1 2009
Ghana - Feasibility Update Q1 2009
Cash at Bank Jan 09 - $11m
A few questions:
- when do they plan to bring Ghana online?
- how long will the $11m last?
Thanks,
JTLP
Thanks Kennas for bringing the report highlights.
I am sure PRU board will love what you said about take over. My feelings are they are more looking some one to buy and making the project as attractive as they can.
With 17 months pay back period and considering the low AUS dollar is a temporary phenomenon for 12 months, high Gold price assumption of US $850/Oz for the scoping study is making the expected profit figure too high.
That could probably explain market's price discount after the announcement.
NOt sure and would like to know your and others analytical thoughts.
Do you recall what that was valued at per oz of gold?So, what would a 'big boy' pay for that sort of additional to their existing gold portfolio?
Lihir/EQI deal still remains the best yardstick, imo, and PRU dwarfs EQI in terms of in ground gold (yes, I know EQI was a modest producer).
Times have changed jman.
I think you'll find the big boys are now looking at anything with 2m oz 'potential', especially if you get a 5m oz + deposit with it!
Care to explain what you're getting at here miner? "low AUD" a "temporary phenomenon"? Says who? Is it really that relevant now?
And you're saying $850/oz is too high? Even though gold is now USD910 odd and everyone worth a cracker in the game says higher gold prices are inevitable.....? C'mon, it is a scoping study - a preliminary economic assessment.
Well I could also counter saying that given they target 2m oz by end 2009 the production rate will most likely double and the opex fall very significantly.
Do you recall what that was valued at per oz of gold?
I suppose I could look it up, but you may have it handy.
Cheers
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?