- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,292
- Reactions
- 17,521
School halls - blatant propping up of the building industry.YAnd yet here we are having to pay even more tax just so the government can waste it on school halls, pink bats, carbon sequestation, car industry bailouts etc etc
Agree that he should pull his head in re the unnecessary pledges and instead, as mentioned yesterday, say he can't make a valid response until he sees what he inherits in the books from the Labor government.Will Abbott ever stop making these stupid and unnecessary pledges?:headshake Pledges that one day he will have to renege on and be on a par with Juliar. He should have waited to see its effects on the health industry.
I will be hit by this new law; I do not ask any subsidy, I just ask freedom of doing what I want; I had full cover gold all extras etc 2 years ago when I nearly lost my hand in a nasty encounter with a circular saw;
My emergency treatment was at the public hospital (Royal Brisbane) and the treatment was the best available around for emergency;
I then went private for microsurgery, graft, 3h long surgery, etc etc; ultimately with my top of the top cover costing a packet (with rebate) I was still out of pocket by around 3k;
I could afford loosing a hand every 2 to 3 years and still be better off financially
Do not lure yourself: private cover will not be what you expect
And if real s##t happens (coronary bypass, complications etc), the public system will be the only one you will afford as you can read in the fine print
My conclusion was that private cover allowed me a nice private room with TV, the rest was a waste.
So now I will try to get the cheapest available cover with make me avoid the penalty:
max excess and as few as possible cover for lower dollar. Any recommendation welcome...
In the meantime, the coming months will see dental work and new pairs of glasses for the whole (small) family!!!!
I think the with the life threatning stuff your right but try getting a shoulder or knee or back looked at while your not getting payed and watch that burn a hole in your bank account.
I am a doctor and I would not go anywhere without health insurance. I can afford it and therefore think I should pay for it. It is simply not worth the risk (and risk is what insurance is all about) for me not to have it. I have complete faith in the public system to deal with emergency cases soundly but my family's health and well being is the most important thing and will spare no cost.
it would be really interesting to have someone giving us some real $figure on that: anyone with a knee reconstruction cost within full private cover?
And someone who went without private cover??
As I said my skin, nerve and vessel graft was just an endless list of above threathold so not covered;
Private insurance will at the most (and within limits) cover the gap between medicare paidback and a grossly undervalued figure supposed to be the "cost" of a procedure; you will soon discover that all decent surgeons, hospitals, etc are way above the medicare figure.
So my resulting analysis that private health cover is worthless except for the feel good feeling;
Would you take a house insurance which would only cover for median house price when you own a castle, and would you believe them if the premium was the same irrespective of the house or unit size/value (in private health, same premium irrespective of the household size or age)
The whole private health insurance is a scam distorted by dogmatic belief, and a carrot and stick approach.
So please can I pay a $1k hospital cover to a Moldovian fund policy with $10k extra and limited /hardly any benefit?
A good business concept here...
Or will the ATO fine me for tax avoidance in the new Australian spirit?
A bit cranky as you can read...
Agree, with the public system it's more about access and the waiting lists.you dont seem to get my drift
unless you cant walk with a dodgy knee they aint gonna even look at ya.
its not the level of care its getting the care
Sounds too good to be true.Work is now encouraging us to pre-pay our private health for the 12/13 FY as that way we will not be slugged with the removal of the private health rebate, until June 2013.
Work is now encouraging us to pre-pay our private health for the 12/13 FY as that way we will not be slugged with the removal of the private health rebate, until June 2013.
Will cost me $2k to pay upfront and save about $400, so not a bad return, and anything to stop the gov getting more money off me is also worth it
Sounds too good to be true.
I'd be checking the fine print with the ATO, for example, does any prepayment count for next year anyway, and if not, are you then liable for the surcharge ?
I can see retrospective legislation if the government have botched it.Worthwhile getting this clarified.
gg
Got this from work and then spoke to both my accountant and NIB (my health fund) and they confirmed if you prepay before the end of this FY it means that you will be paying at the current rate, as opposed to the increased rate for next FY.
View attachment 47354
Got this from work and then spoke to both my accountant and NIB (my health fund) and they confirmed if you prepay before the end of this FY it means that you will be paying at the current rate, as opposed to the increased rate for next FY.
View attachment 47354
At the same time, the Medicare Levy Surcharge (MLS) will be increased for higher income earners who don’t have hospital insurance – an additional tax of up to 1.5% of your income will apply.
On second thought, the might be being very tricky.2, 4,6, 8, take advantage of another government stuffup, don't wait.
Does the income testing of the rebate apply to premiums paid in the 2011-12 income year?
No. The legislation to income test the private health insurance rebate starts from 1 July 2012 and will apply to premiums paid on or after that date. We will determine your private health insurance rebate entitlement for the 2012-13 income year (Tax Time 2013) and later years.
Can you make a claim for a private health insurance tax offset in your 2011-12 tax return for premiums that provide insurance cover for a future income year?
Yes, providing:
the premiums are paid in the 2011-12 income year
you do not claim a tax offset for a premium payment where the private health insurance rebate has been claimed as a premium reduction, or a claim from Medicare.
Premium payments you make in 2011-12 may be for a policy that provides insurance cover for a period that includes a future income year.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?