This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Pirates

Joined
4 September 2008
Posts
117
Reactions
1
There is a lot of talk in the media around the world about pirates off the coast of Somalia. I thought I would do a bit of poking around the net and see what I could find. This is what I came up with "You are being lied to about pirates."

Apparently the Somali’s are "coast guarding" their waters to prevent over fishing and dumping of toxic waste. Since the fall of the government in Somalia, there has been no law or protection for the waters in the Gulf of Aden so allegedly some people have been taking advantage of this.

Check out this story by CBC Canada presenting the other side to the story.

Adding this up means that the seas are being over fished of toxic fish.

Coming soon to a French restaurant.


But in all seriousness, i hope this isn't happening.

:bier:

blue
 

Interesting stuff. Just a bit surprised to find out that nuclear waste was dumped off their coast! Typical of our media to forget to tell us something like that.
 

http://www.sfbayview.com/2009/you-are-being-lied-to-about-pirates/
 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...cy-is-booming---by-former-hostage-victim.html

 
The economics of the fishing community is but a small part of the story that has turned Somalia into a living hell.

Check out the Amnesty International website and just have a look at whats happening there. The following link describes just one instance - a 13 year old girl who was stoned to death in a stadium by 50 men with 1000 people looking on. She made the mistake of reporting the fact she was raped to the authorities, who then charged her with adultery. I am literally moved to tears by this report.

Read the full story to the bottom of the page - it gets worse as you go on. A spokesman for the stoners claims she was actually happy with the punishment.
http://www.amnesty.org/en/for-media/press-releases/somalia-girl-stoned-was-child-13-20081031

Somalia desparatley needs the UN to step in and impose a caretaker government to stop the humanitarin disaster. Pirates a but the tip of the iceberg here, and the one good thing they are doing is exposing this part of the world to the global community.

I do not want to live in a world where this kind of thing is ignored by the global community.
 
I don't think any of us feel OK about it, but don't be holding your breath expecting the UN to do something. Consider Zimbabwe for just one example.

Re the pirates, perhaps I'm missing something, but how is it that a large cargo ship can be dictated to by a few blokes in a runabout? Why don't the crew of the cargo ship just fire a few shots in the appropriate direction?
Do they just meekly drop down a boarding ladder and submit to being taken over? Why would they??? Maybe someone can explain what I'm obviously missing in this situation, including why the considerable resources of the US Navy are being used to protect said cargo ships?
 
this is the reason something will be done about somalia...

also, alternate media has been suggesting that the piracy is something more than it seems......hence the web site wiredpirate...


http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/nta53713.htm
 
Interesting articles cheers. Nice to see the different perspectives.
 
also, china has expressed interest in oil exploration of the area.......

im sure the us would love some military bases in such a strategic position. one could imagine the cia approaching a warlord and offering him future government if certain tactics were employed (piracy) to give the US an opportunity to go in and 'clean up' somalia 'for its own good'....(of course)


.
 
Why don't the crew of the cargo ship just fire a few shots in the appropriate direction?

Have you ever seen merchant ship? Most of the crew are filipinas and other paid foreigners. They are not trained to use guns. Also, it is all unionised, probably most of them wouldn't touch a gun unless they had it in their union.

As big as those ships are, there is actually minimal staff on them.

I do agree though that for a small amount of $$$ they could hire professionals to board these ships whilst they are in that general area. It just seems like such an easy thing to get accomplished.
 

julia,

piracy has been a long term problem, not solely occurring in the waters off somalia.

these blokes are now using ships in the waters ,sailing around amongst the shipping and playing cat and mouse with the naval vessels.

they board with fast inflatables, and speed boats.. and are heavily armed.

most ships will try and use water cannon, but you cant duck bullets. its very dangerous.

i have been on ship boarded by looters, who would come on board, and open up containers and hope to get lucky. but pirates want the entire vessel.

you can lock down the superstructure, but you can easily go by outside stairs to the bridge and break in and take command

the recent decision to not allow the pirates safely go back to land, and this radical decision to terminate the lives of the pirates by the US has changed the rules, until now you could talk and discuss and negotiate, the warlords have now decided to single out the US shipping and to take lives. this decision to escalate the delicate balance there makes it hard for future negotiations, as you will have to pay not only for you ship back, but also for the lives of each crew member, if you dont pay they will be terminated.

we are now seeing a transition from orchestrated piracy with some diplomacy and usually no violence, to the threats now of the pirates to return the favor on innocent US lives, they have upped the stakes big time now. the pirates will obviously show their superiority in these waters, take US citizens and take lives, and ransom the lives of the remaining crews.. murder is now being discussed in the armada of the pirates..

there is no way you can control these waters, and if you adopt the rule of arming ships, then those with weapons will also have to contend with the pirates coming up with better weapons themselves, like rocket propelled grenades and we will see a need for the somalis to organise themselves even better..

the US and french are now very aggressive in these regions, being prepared to kill pirates, and also their own citizens in the case of the french..

for the rest of the world who have to pass through these waters, they now have a major problem coming their way and the safety of the crews are now at stake.. before it was about the vessel and crew as a package, now its going to be murder kidnapping and ransom, its going to be real nasty
 
julia,

piracy has been a long term problem, not solely occurring in the waters off somalia.

Maybe time to do something radical or at least different to what was done in Somalia waters for all those years and maybe what US did is what should be done long time ago.

I think that there could be UN service, that every ship gets 20 or 30 marines for protection and once in safe waters they can be whisked away on ship going the other way.

Also convoys with flanking war ships for protection could be another way to protect merchant ships.

Simply fearing that status quo was all of the sudden damaged is something I think should not be high on consideration list.
 
Maybe time to do something radical or at least different to what was done in Somalia waters for all those years and maybe what US did is what should be done long time ago.
..



I am glad that something concrete is being done to fix the anarchy on these waters.
Pity that it had to be US again to take the initiative.

We seem to be bagging them for everything, but at least on this occasion they lived up to expectation.
 

Thanks for interesting and informative response, AgentM. Your own experience sounds less than pleasant. Would you consider telling us more about what happened and the outcome?
 
Ron Paul has a suggestion about combating Piracy.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21245.html

A little-known congressional power could help the federal government keep the Somali pirates in check ”” and possibly do it for a discount price.

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and a growing number of national security experts are calling on Congress to consider using letters of marque and reprisal, a power written into the Constitution that allows the United States to hire private citizens to keep international waters safe.

Used heavily during the Revolution and the War of 1812, letters of marque serve as official warrants from the government, allowing privateers to seize or destroy enemies, their loot and their vessels in exchange for bounty money.

The letters also require would-be thrill seekers to post a bond promising to abide by international rules of war.

In a YouTube video earlier this week, Paul suggested lawmakers consider issuing letters, which could relieve American naval ships from being the nation’s primary pirate responders ”” a free-market solution to make the high seas safer for cargo ships.

“I think if every potential pirate knew this would be the case, they would have second thoughts because they could probably be blown out of the water rather easily if those were the conditions,” Paul said.
 

It'd be like master and commander all over again, where do I sign up??? J/K
 
You would think that the Americans would realise the stupidity of taking prisoners back to America for trial. He will end up being a hero like some of the the Gitmo nasties. The smart thing would have been to let him go. The British have told their Captains not to take prisoners for fear they will end up asylum seekers.


http://www.smh.com.au/world/smiling-somali-pirate-suspect--in-ny-20090421-adon.html


 
Ha ha ha some Pirates thought a navy frigate was a commercial vessel.

Pirates Target The Wrong Ship

Unfortunately instead of being prosecuted they will most likely be released by the Somali officials due to lack of evidence.
 

Because they don't have any weapons, and are not allowed to under international law.

Do they just meekly drop down a boarding ladder and submit to being taken over? Why would they???

Although some may wish to do an unarmed Rambo against AK-47s and RPGs, most would think it best to surrender.

Maybe someone can explain what I'm obviously missing in this situation, including why the considerable resources of the US Navy are being used to protect said cargo ships?

It is the duty of every warship to protect other ships from piracy. The Captain in that recent hostage drama was a US citizen which is why the US government had a special interest in the matter.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...