Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,134
- Reactions
- 11,246
Re: PEN - Peninsula Minerals
Good stats on the surface of it hang. What's the mc of both attributed to the projects? Would make the comparison clearer.Thankfully the USA values ISR uranium projects
Here is a comparison of PEN's Lance project, with what the USA regards as one of the good ones.
Both companies projects in the Powder River Basin Wyoming USA, both the same ISR process. Data sourced from the respective companies recent PFS.
Lance is also noted as having a Darcy rating around 4-5 times higher than Uranerz has reported (as mentioned here previously).
Both companies are delineating further resources.
Uranerz is on a buy recommendation with 5 USA brokers and is ahead of PEN by 12mths on permitting and proposed start up.
The figures speak for themselves. Also do a comparison of the Opex and Capex of PEN compared with conventional miners costs. You will see why ISR is so good.
PEN 15.1M/lbs -
$72.1M Capex (of all plant and equipment including contingency for replacement cost of around $11M and mobile equipment)
$21.42/lb Total Opex (including taxes and royalties)
$14.00/lb Opex
Uranerz 11.25M/lbs -
$85.2M Capex (of all plant and equipment not including any contingency for replacement cost of plant or any mobile plant)
$32.70/lb Opex (including taxes and royalties, plus $6.70/lb toll processing fee)
$26.00/lb Opex