kennas said:Gold
Kauri said:It produces gold ..
Sorry, feeling in a silly mood today... :silly:
fma007 said:well, i say oil price drop is the reason because lower oil prices makes oil seem a more attractive energy source than uranium. Obviously does not translate directly into practice but in terms of sentiment maybe..
lancer said:I do understand that, but what about the other near term U producers that went up yesterday and today? I would guess the whole sector would be down a lot if it were due to oil.
Although I hold PDN, I don't think it's good value at present prices.scsl said:BT, thanks for the attached article.
"$10 next month should be regarded a done deal" - wow, that's confidence!!
I don't think there's many a time that I think PDN is not overpriced (if that makes sense). Yet I still go ahead with short term trades - for fear of missing out on the next big jump and/or going with the trend. So do you think the sub $7.50 level will come hand in hand with the next market correction? Or will it come off with other uranium stocks? PDN is such a favourite in the market that I'm always reluctant to take a short position in it.rederob said:Although I hold PDN, I don't think it's good value at present prices.
If I were looking to buy into the stock, my target price would be $7.40 tho I would have 2 shots at it: First entry at $7.50 (to make sure I "got" some) and the remainder at $7.35 or less if a selldown was in the wind.
I don't think $10 is close-by and think April is a chance.
But as Lancer notes, a spot price hike could do wonders.
I think the real take off point will be when PDN has posted its first quarter results and we know what we are dealing with.
PDN will keep going up as long as the U price keeps rising. An important date is Feb 6 when Cameco the largest U producer will give an update on the flooding of its U mine and how long will be the delay in Prod. This could give another boost or burst to U stocks. So I am not too worry until this date and the alp meeting on mine policy in April will be an important one too. I hold some PDN warrant as I don't want to indeed miss the next jump in price as PDN typically moves by waves.scsl said:I don't think there's many a time that I think PDN is not overpriced (if that makes sense). Yet I still go ahead with short term trades - for fear of missing out on the next big jump and/or going with the trend. So do you think the sub $7.50 level will come hand in hand with the next market correction? Or will it come off with other uranium stocks? PDN is such a favourite in the market that I'm always reluctant to take a short position in it.
Between last April and June PDN dipped over $2.00 from peak to trough - ie around $5.50 to intraday under $3.50.scsl said:I don't think there's many a time that I think PDN is not overpriced (if that makes sense). Yet I still go ahead with short term trades - for fear of missing out on the next big jump and/or going with the trend. So do you think the sub $7.50 level will come hand in hand with the next market correction? Or will it come off with other uranium stocks? PDN is such a favourite in the market that I'm always reluctant to take a short position in it.
That will be great.lancer said:I am supposed to get next weeks U spot price soon. Usually comes out in the next hour and I will Post it as soon as I know it. Hopefully this will help, I think we are due for a little jump. Trade tech was forecasting between 72 and 75 last week we will see if its true
Thanks. I was thinking that indeed a little rise would have been good to maybe get PDN to the $10 mark.lancer said:This coming weeks U spot price will stay the same Unfortunately. Still at $72. I guess its better than dropping, I just think we are due for a little rise...
Maybe spooly, but the uranium price really just depends on how much people are willing to pay for it at auction, from my understanding.spooly74 said:Just my opinion, but I cannot see a rise in the price of uranium till there is an update from Cameco regarding Cigar Lake . . remember Cigar Lake was expected to produce up to 18 million pounds a year between 2008 and 2010....with grades up to 20%U3O8
News is due on Feb 6th I think and hopefully its bad . . which is good for :aus:
cheers
kennas said:Maybe spooly, but the uranium price really just depends on how much people are willing to pay for it at auction, from my understanding.
Also, everyone seems to assuming that the Comenco update will bring bad news on Cigar Lake. What if they say it's ahead of schedule to be fixed? I actually don't think this will occur, but it could. Just a thought. Not downramping here, just trying to give another take on things. I do hold a few uranium stocks myself...
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.