theasxgorilla
Problem solved... next bubble.
- Joined
- 7 December 2006
- Posts
- 2,343
- Reactions
- 1
It strikes me as very strange, giving an obscene pay rise to Execs of a company that is probably going down the gurgler. But I guess thats the way companies are run these days by the execs - short term avarice and greed, and take as much dosh as you can before sticking it up the shareholders.
It used to be that the way to become extraordinarily wealthy was to be an entrepreneur. Probably still is. But I would estimate that the last 10-15 years it has been a lot more efficient (with the exception of dotcom), in terms of effort required, to gain control of a company from the inside and extract wealth from it through extravagant salaries and bonuses. Yes you kill the goose that was laying the golden eggs, but how many golden eggs does one senior management team and board of directors need to be set up for life?
Good to see more and more people recognising Globalisation as the failure that it is ......
Whats even worse in a welfare state like Australia is we are borrowing from the very nations taking our jobs to pay our unemployed ..... if it wasnt so serious you would think its a joke.
Good to see more and more people recognising Globalisation as the failure that it is ......
Agree here G. Obviously either route is not 'easy' but to me it seems to have less risk to try and work ones way up a corporate ladder and hopefully get to those massively paid roles, than take a lot of risks starting ones own co, which you have no initial wage etc etc
Good to see more and more people recognising Globalisation as the failure that it is ......
I would rather live in a globalised worl than have to rely on everything been produced (at probably a worse quality) more expensively in Aus
PACIFIC Brands is pressing ahead with a contentious plea for millions of dollars in extra taxpayer assistance, and the Rudd Government appears largely powerless to stop the company from getting most of the funding despite the loss of 1850 jobs.
In a move branded as "shameless" by unions, Pacific Brands yesterday offered to provide at least $1 million to help retrain its redundant workers, while confirming it was pursuing about $7 million in government grants.
Kevin Rudd said yesterday the company's decision to cut local jobs and shift its clothing manufacturing operations to China was "frankly, in so many respects, beyond the pale".
"In terms of the monies that they have got from the Government, we'll go through all of that in terms of what can be extracted back from them," the Prime Minister told Melbourne radio.
Pacific Brands responded by detailing its offer of a "seven-figure sum" to help retrain the redundant employees, while confirming it was pursuing its application for about $7 million in taxpayer grants.
The application seeks to have taxpayers reimburse the company's investment for research and development under the industry's Strategic Investment Program Scheme.
Under the scheme, companies are entitled to a proportion of what they invested in the previous financial year. Pacific Brands has already received $14.5 million from the two previous years.
"Yes, we have an application for funding," a company spokesman said.
"It's for money spent on Australian-based research and development."
A spokeswoman for Industry Minister Kim Carr said the grants process was "not a process the Government controls" and was "done at arm's length".
The spokeswoman said the only way the Government could claw back funding from Pacific Brands was if the company moved any factories or equipment offshore before 2015.
The company has said it does not intend to move any equipment offshore.
The Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union said the company's strategy of offering to fund retraining while seeking more taxpayers funds would "only deepen the level of public anger and cynicism" towards the company.
"I think this company is absolutely shameless," said the union's national secretary, Michele O'Neil.
She said she had been approached by a number of businessmen about buying out either whole or parts of the business to keep manufacturing in Australia.
Ms O'Neil said the Government should continue to press the company to reverse its decision and, if that failed, broker serious discussions about selling it off to a local interest.
Workers from the Bonds factory at Wentworthville in Sydney yesterday held a rally to protest against the jobs cuts.
Union organiser Jim Owen said the workers wanted their entitlements protected.
"We've asked the company to put money into a trust fund so we know the entitlements are protected fully," he said.
Union officials restated their commitment not to allow machinery from the factories to be moved overseas by either rail, road, ship or air.
But a threatened product boycott has not been activated while officials work through options to try to save the jobs.
Hi guys,
Here is your 4am update.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25150808-2702,00.html
Pacific in push for $7m grant
A spokeswoman for Industry Minister Kim Carr said the grants process was "not a process the Government controls" and was "done at arm's length".
AUSTRALIAN consumers are partly to blame for the demise of 1850 jobs at Pacific Brands, the company's chief executive says.
Sue Morphet last month announced the job cuts at the clothing company, which makes iconic brands Bonds, Berlei and King Gee, and the shift of some local manufacturing to China.
While she says she endured "sleepless nights'' and "anxiety'' before announcing the loss of so many jobs, a hard-nosed Ms Morphet says the rest of Pacific Brands was "propping up'' local clothing manufacture.
Speaking on the Nine Network's 60 Minutes program last night, Ms Morphet blamed clothing buyers in part for the decision.
"Long, long gone are the days when Australians are actually prepared to pay more for Australian-made goods,'' Ms Morphet said.
"The only time that we'll pay for Australian goods is if they are giving us something that buying elsewhere or cheaper isn't giving us.''
She does have a point though.
What amuses me is the lady on 60min last whinging she had been betrayed most probably buys other brands that have moved production overseas without a thought to the Australian jobs lost.
[SIZE=+2]IT'S ALL OUR FAULT!!![/SIZE]
Apparently, according to head honcho Ms Morphet, Oz consumers are a snivelling bunch of tightwads.
Stupid me. I could have helped save all those jobs if only I had rushed out and bought another 1,000,000 pairs of Jocks!
So, jail me....
Sue Morphett is an arrogant retard.
Sue Morphett is an arrogant retard.
Why? Because she made a hard decision for the benefit of her company?
What's she meant to do, let the company lose profitability and risk losing more Aussie jobs? She also has share holders to answer to as well.
It's easy to critise from this side of the fence, but to me at least it looks like they explored every avenue to try to keep production here in Aus but the numbers just didn't stack up.
She is an arrogant retard because it is her responsibility to market the products of the company. Consumers are a pretty fickle bunch these days and unless you market something and introduce new products or novel ways to adapt your products, Consumers will simply not buy them.
That arrogant retard should take some responsibility for the demise of her own company including the years of assistance it received from the taxpayer.
I stand by what I said earlier.
Sue Morphett is an arrogant retard!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?