Miner,
You do me an injustice. Perhaps I should have been more clear. My comment was not in any way a whinge about ASF, which I think is terrific.
I was going to ignore the undeserved scolding but I am interested in the discussion, hence my defence/explanation.
What I was getting at, is that there is so little reliable information available to assess the stock and make predictions about the performance of the outfit. The discussion in the thread is useful to a point but is essentially speculative musings, even with a bit of number crunching thrown in.
It is like looking at a fog shrouded jungle island like the one where King Kong lives. You just can't know what's in there, and if you go there everything turns out to be a surprise, so often a bad one. The information provided by the outfit is obviously biased and has to be dissected to find the facts and what's relevant, and what it means. Information is missing. A statement that they employ 500 people is not very useful if it turns out that half of them are engaged in corporate PR and the rest don't know the business.
Why people invest on this basis, maybe no better than tossing a coin, is a mystery to me. I realise that you have to go with the information you've got. So I am asking?
Welcome to thread Veritas and good thoughts.
Could you please share your thoughts / research on comparative capabilities between Nomad NOD and DCG ? The later is a new comer and stolen the show. NOD is fairly long in the business but struggling.
With current forthcoming turnaround in mining sector, building and accommodation is a must. DCG is wining contracts in Gorgon why Nomad is shy ?
With my recent experience in getting quotatins from Nomad and DCG the later was more expensive. Then I wonder why Nomad is loosing market ?
DNH
Interesting your comparison with DCG and NOD, have a look at which Company the former CEO of NOD went to..
Can anyone describe a scenario where NOD goes out of business within two years? A $2M loss seems more than well covered by cash on hand. Their operating cash flows appear to just cover the capex expenses so overall cash burn rate seems sustainable. Debt has grown but interest coverage for 2009 was 9.5 times. Even adjusting for a loss they appear to have existing debt well covered.
I went to the 2009 annual report to answer these questions, and to my shock they don't have any section that discusses their bank facilities in very much detail. The 2009 letter says they are currently in discussion with lenders.
The balance sheet shows that none of the bank loans are long-term (note 19 on page 75). Note 17 on page 74 suggests all of the secured bank debt is short-term. So when does this come up for renewal, and what now are the banks going to extract from us as their pound of flesh? The bottom of page 61 says they have to reduce their facility by $10M in October of 2009 and the full facility with Westpac is due for a review in April 2010. It might be well to wait for that hurdle to clear, because if that facility is yanked then we have a liquidity crisis.
On page 74 I see they have "Hire purchase liabilities" of $13.8M and on page 75 they have a "non-current" (is that same as long-term?) hire purchase liability of $11.9M. What are those?
After spending all morning reading, i got more interested in this stock , interesting information here
During the time of my reading it snuck up 10%
It been a year since the fall from grace ..a year ago I decided to stay away but
development lately prompt me to dig deep....
I been going through a lot of their material I start to like it....
This has all the hall mark of a turn around....uncle Warren Buffet often tell me
A turn around business seldom turns ...I disobey him with CCP and FLT and
I may disobey with NOD
It been a year since the fall from grace ..a year ago I decided to stay away but
development lately prompt me to dig deep....
I been going through a lot of their material I start to like it....
This has all the hall mark of a turn around....uncle Warren Buffet often tell me
A turn around business seldom turns ...I disobey him with CCP and FLT and
I may disobey with NOD
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?