That depends how you look at it. It is possible that they lose scale (and therefore margins contract) and their reputation is battered (although I admit, I am not sure how, but it is is possible). Ralph Lauren sales were almost half of their revenue, weren't they? That's a fair chunk of cash flow down the drain, if that cash flow (and the capital it was coming from) was helping the expansion then they better replace it pretty quickly! That's what I mean by losing meat. Maybe I should have said it loses some of its edge. You make a good point, but all of a sudden they have gone from a position with degrees of certainty to one of without! Let us hope they have good contingency plans for their sakes.They lose 1/3 of NPAT, but they gain some meat on their balance sheet as they free up the capital that was supporting the licence previously. Their announcement tried to cast a slight positive spin on the event, that this freed-up capital can be used to grow their own brand more aggressively.
Things won't look too good for tomorrow, however.
I assume that Rodger the Dodger would have sold out of this one back in April
If it was that easy then why would they have been paying out 80-85% of their earnings for so long? I think the market has lost its marbles with this one today... as far as I can see the valuation for the Oroton segment of the business is higher than it was yesterday. It certainly well exceeds the price I thought it would touch.The earning potential of ~$30m invested into this business is excellent, assuming that they can deploy that sort of amount. The problem is that they are basically going to have to almost double their Oroton business in order to maintain their profitability. God knows how achieveable that is.
If it was that easy then why would they have been paying out 80-85% of their earnings for so long? I think the market has lost its marbles with this one today... as far as I can see the valuation for the Oroton segment of the business is higher than it was yesterday. It certainly well exceeds the price I thought it would touch.
I don't disagree with you. CAPEX last year was ~$6m across both brands. They're going to end up with a lot of cash on their balance sheet for years or they're going to distribute it.
and where do Oroton made their stuff? if you sell rich stuff in Asia and it said made in China that is a no go zone
skc said:I am a bit stunned as well that they didn't fall more today.
Most luxury labels are made in China or other parts of Asia these days. I know off the top of my head Coach, Prada, Burberry and Emporio Armani are all made in China. Last time I was in Asia (earlier this week) they didn't seem to be struggling.
At the very pointy end LV, Jil Sander etc are all still made in Europe but then again LV burns all their excess stock at the end of the season rather than have end of season sales, which is a different league to the one ORL is playing in.
I think we all are.
You may be right but from doco I watch 2 years ago these Italian fashion house still make majority of luxury goods outside China and only 10-20% in China to test the appetite.
on the same year I research a bit into these things and most Chinese dont like buying luxury goods brands made in China, No brainer if it said made in Italy or France etc....
Time will tell if Oroton Asian sale dont pickup you know what may cause it...
I expect ORL's share price to drift lower after it goes ex-dividend in a couple of months.
Interesting to note that Ralph Lauren Corporation's share price rose 4.6% in the US on Friday night (our time).
That probably has more to do with RL beating analyst estimates last week.
A 5% move in RL's share price is a market cap change equal to about 3x ORL's entire value.
I'd love to know who is buying and how they can justify this price, for ORL.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?