- Joined
- 23 November 2006
- Posts
- 132
- Reactions
- 0
bozot said:Yes, 2 words manipulation and treeshaking
Come to mind..
Well 5 ann in 90 days and nothing yet , that was 24/1..
Remember reading Newsat nade 5 mill in last year b4 MUL takeover
Mention elsewhere that MUL had 92 mill in accum losses. Does that mean any profit will be tax free or tax reduced.. Any comments on this line of thought?
Just read it They claimed to have bought it for 13mill revenues 22mill profit after tax in 2004 = 5.4 mill aud
Wysiwyg said:I remember buying into MUL at 3.2 c and they had me mesmerised with the same spiel that is out now.
Hopefulone said:Cant figure out
Not in remote situations ...Wysiwyg said:Isn`t` everyone still using copper and fibre optics?
Wysiwyg said:Isn`t` everyone still using copper wire and fibre optics?
Hopefulone said:Sorry, not sure what you are trying to say.
Isnt wireless technology the way to go not 3G but 4G etc
Hopefulone said:Lack of numbers is perplexing me. Why are they delaying releasing good results?
Try to put yourself in AB shoes -what benefit does AB get from doing this. Is it to do with his executive option package and is it based on a Weighted average cost over the last 3 months ? This could explain the reason for holding down the share price.
This is the only thing that I could do if I wanted to maximise my benefit if I was running the company .
But if the figures are bad ie same loss a last year, what would I do? this is a lot harder, but my only answer is to spin some more bull to keep share price up and issue more shares
so if the figures are bad, how do they gain or what benefit is it AB and the boys. goes back down to 0.6c or 0.5c. AB has not sold his shareholding as no notification or has not bought anymore.
Cant figure out
bozot said:The Board is reviewing when will be the appropriate time to issue forecasts and from that time "figures" will be provided. It has been impossible to forecast to date due to the acquiring and disposing of business units however with those activities complete and regular revenues being established, forecasting will become meaningful.
Prior to providing forecasts, The Board feels the provision of ad hoc figures is inappropriate.
brerwallabi said:ALL SOUNDS A BIT IFFY TO ME
Hopefulone said:I agree, sounds iffy but again putting myself in their shoes, the maximum I can get out of the company, without physical stealing, is to using executive option scheme.
If the company figures are unchanged from 30 June 2006 ie big loss then I would disclose as soon as possible to get share price down and the option price very low.
Alternatively if the figures are good I would not disclose anything so that options have a low price.
I have an incling that it is the latter ie good figures and options are going to be issed shortly.
brerwallabi said:Sounds even more IFFY, surely directors do not do things like you suggest.
I say that in jest.
The day that volume spikes very quickly and it starts to move I might jump in for a mil or two and a quick profit but something that I would not like to hold overnight.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?