Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,308
- Reactions
- 11,594
No way. $5 is five bucks! If you had have said $5 ish, then OK.Kennas, give me this one, would you, it is $4.99 man!
I bought @ open for a quickie 4.51
I get $65 a share
Halba, I think your analysis breaks down a little comparing MTN to ERA/PDN market caps. Very different companys I think. What's ERA's total resource? How many other projects do PDN have on the board compared to MTN. Perhaps there's another company in a similar sitaution that it would be better compared to? Not sure which??I get $65 a share
Reasons:
ERA/PDN "producers" value ~5000-6000m.
Halba, I think your analysis breaks down a little comparing MTN to ERA/PDN market caps. Very different companys I think. What's ERA's total resource? How many other projects do PDN have on the board compared to MTN. Perhaps there's another company in a similar sitaution that it would be better compared to? Not sure which??
I'm also not sure if we can count on shares on issue staying around 70m. That's only 15m more than now after oppies are converted. Funding the mine development will be very expensive won't it?? Perhaps a JV partner will assist, but that will dilute it further anyway. Do you have any examples, history, or how much a company is diluted from JORC to production. Perhaps PDN is a recent example.
Otherwise, what you say sounds reasonable, but with the above factored in, I think $65 is ambitious.
No way. $5 is five bucks! If you had have said $5 ish, then OK.Days not over though.
MTN might be getting the benefit of the knowledge now that QLD and WA are unlikely to change their policies this year, or even while Carphead and Beatboy are in power.
PDN has gone from having 300m shares on issue in 2003 to 500m in 2007. If that can be expected with MTN up to production (4 years is reasonable I think) then you need to add 66% ish to the shares on issue. So that brings it to around 90m ish shares on issue by 2011, perhaps. (If PDN is a good example)I'm also not sure if we can count on shares on issue staying around 70m. That's only 15m more than now after oppies are converted. Funding the mine development will be very expensive won't it?? Perhaps a JV partner will assist, but that will dilute it further anyway. Do you have any examples, history, or how much a company is diluted from JORC to production. Perhaps PDN is a recent example.
So, what's the difference in the need to raise as a guestimate? I thought you would have had an idea of the costs to be able to come up with your valuation. What's your guestimate on the costs to develop the mine and get the workforce etc? This must then be applied to the shares on issue in some way? Yes, agree current sp is a factor, but you have been able to make a call of 70m on issue?? I can't find in PDNs BFS how much it was supposed to cost to get to production. I can only find $20m for first stage, and approval for a $71 debt facility....Perhaps SMMs PFS might be a good indication. Do you have that figure? I think this is important in being able to get a more realistic valuation at production. Or, maybe there's just too many 'ifs'??Doesn't work that way kennas. It's all about the price of the shares and need to raise. PDN raised when uranium wasn't hyped. Now you can raise 20% higher than the market price, less dilution. MTN has $8m cash in bank, no raisings in the short term IMHO
I agree. With the likelihood of QLD and WA premiers remaining recalcitrant, coal industry slaves, attention could focus even more to SA/NT for U. The smaller developers need either lots of money to get up and running, JVs or takeovers. With the global imbalance in supply and demand pressing the big players for more resources, the later is the most likely IMO.Doubt we'll get to $10...too many takeovers
It can be taken over any time I think after clearance from the regulator. Not sure about details of foreign ownership of Australian U mines. Mega took Redport....I doubt MTN will last on the ASX for another month..once ALP policy changes it is allowed to get taken over isn't it..?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?