Nickel - Bullish technically and fundamentally

[mullokintyre]

Further to the "default" on Nickel exposure, comes an interesting conspiracy theory about the LME.
From Zero Hedge

Like many commodities, nickel price has surged from the Covid lows. However this week is has spiked, effectively doubling, and briefly reached highs earlier this week of USD 100,000.
In response to this move, the LME has closed the market for nickel, and cancelled trades.

Why have they done this? Essentially this was to give time (and by cancelling trades, reduce the amount) for a major (Chinese) member to make a margin call. But in reality this was default by a member, and LME choosing not to place that member in default.

If we look at the default by Einer Aas in 2018, we can see why this is a default in all but name. When Einer Aas could not make a marign call he was bankrupted. His default waterfall is shown below. His initial margin was taken, then his default fund contribution. Value unknown, but I would estimate around €30MM. The clearinghouse then chipped in €7MM, and then there as a €107MM from the commodity service default fund. This commodity service default fund is paid by “surviving” members of clearinghouse. As every clearinghouse trade is matched, typically “surviving” members are the winners, or traders that have been on the right side of the trade.

The loss on the LME Nickel trade has been estimated at up to USD 12bn. The LME default fund (4.2 on its IOSCO CPMI disclosure) is given at USD 1bn. I don’t know if that number is entirely accurate, of if all of it can be applied to the nickel market, or is segregated by product. Clearly, there was a counterparty who could not make margin call, and if the rules had been followed, they should have been declared bankrupt, and the position sold, and any losses would be paid by LME, and then surviving members.

However, LME has cancelled trades, to reduce the price from USD 100,000 to USD 50,000, closed the market until Friday, and will limit price movements to 10% a day.

What does this mean? We know that one major counterparty should have gone bust, and is now getting a stealth bailout from the clearinghouse. Rather than asking surviving members to recapitalize, it has artificially adjusted prices to reduce their winnings. All of this has been done without consulting all members, and to the benefit of as far as we know one well connected member. As mentioned before, in 2019 large clearinghouse members recommended reforming the default waterfall.

So why would the LME not bankrupt the Chinese , and in the process push the losses onto the other LME members?
Perhaps it can be found in the statement from another Zero Hedge Story

Needless to say, the fact that the LME is now owned by Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing, whose biggest shareholder is the Hong Kong government which for the past two years has been a puppet of China, did not hurt Xiang, whose empire would have been bankrupted had the LME forced him to make payment on his margin call. None other than outgoing LME chief executive Matt Chamberlain admitted as much.

Long story short: if you are a small nobody and your margin call will wipe out just you, nobody will think twice to margin you out; on the other hand if you are a Chinese tycoon whose default will ruin not just him but lead to massive losses for all LME members and also drag down more than one broker in the process (as Russell Clark explained earlier), well then... the rules can certainly be bent.

And sure enough, on Wednesday morning, two days after Xiang was supposed to be in default buried by billions in margin calls, Bloomberg reports that he has successfully secured "a package of loans from local and international banks to help it meet a wave of margin calls."

According to the report, Tsingshan Holding has won credit promises from - drumroll - none other than JPMorgan Chase, and one of China's largest banks, China Construction Bank, in meetings that ran into the pre-dawn hours of Wednesday morning. Some of the terms, such as how much extra collateral Tsingshan needs to pledge, are still under discussion, Bloomberg's sources said.

Since JPMorgan's assistance alone was not enough, Chinese authorities also directed Tsingshan’s domestic banks to offer more credit lines to the company, with the bulk of the new capital going toward satisfying the margin calls on its existing positions on the London Metal Exchange.

so we find that once again, the Chinese look after their own and screw everyone else.
It also highlights how JP Morgan will let nothing get in the way of them making a buck or two.
Mick

 

[mullokintyre]

Further to the "default" on Nickel exposure, comes an interesting conspiracy theory about the LME.
From Zero Hedge

So why would the LME not bankrupt the Chinese , and in the process push the losses onto the other LME members?
Perhaps it can be found in the statement from another Zero Hedge Story







so we find that once again, the Chinese look after their own and screw everyone else.
It also highlights how JP Morgan will let nothing get in the way of them making a buck or two.
Mick

As a further result of the LME action, some players are saying they will not trade on the exchange if the LME is going to favour one party over another.
From The Australian

The LME has said it would open the market cautiously with a shortened trading day and limits on moves in nickel prices in either direction. It has asked companies with big long positions and big short positions in the metal to pair off those positions, reducing the risk of a further short squeeze. It could resort to forcing the companies to net out their positions, said the person familiar with the exchange.

Investors on the exchange were furious about the contract cancellations, which they say give an advantage to Tsingshan, its lenders and the LME. One hedge-fund manager said he had cut his positions on the LME by 90 per cent because he couldn’t put clients’ money on the line and risk the trades being cancelled.

A point of contention among some bruised traders: The LME is owned by Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing, and its actions helped buy a major Chinese company and its state-owned lenders time to stem losses.

Mr Chamberlain said the nationality of the company played no part in the LME’s response to the seizing up of the nickel market. “I can unambiguously say that the nationality of the participant was not a relevant factor here,” he said.

Mick

 

[waterbottle]

@mullokintyre great posts!

The LME is not the only exchange that interrupts the 'free market' during periods of high volatility

 

[Tyre Kicker]

After Elon Musk called for more nickel to be mined back in September...

Miners answer Musk call for more nickel

"Please mine more nickel," these four words from Tesla CEO Elon Musk reverberated across the global mining sector and raised awareness of how fundamental nickel is to the lithium-ion batteries powering hundreds of millions of electric vehicles to come off Tesla and traditional automaker assembly...

www.miningnewsnorth.com

The price has been doing well but with all the miners old and new out there with their spades and buckets digging away there may be a slight oversupply one may wonder?

I had a look at the forecast for nickel and it is suggesting there will be a falling away of the price.

"Nickel is expected to trade at 19696.98 USD/MT by the end of this quarter, according to Trading Economics global macro models and analysts expectations. Looking forward, we estimate it to trade at 18341.49 in 12 months time."

View attachment 133840

The ‘ol forecast you looked at was only slightly off Ann.

 

[Ann]

The ‘ol forecast you looked at was only slightly off Ann.

I reckon all bets are off as far as price projections for a shipload of products now there is the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the world telling Russia where they can shove their stuff.

 

[Tropico]

So why would the LME not bankrupt the Chinese , and in the process push the losses onto the other LME members?
Perhaps it can be found in the statement from another Zero Hedge Story

My understanding is that if there is a default, then LME Clear is responsible to cover any losses of the countering parties. LME Clear would more than likely go into administration itself if this happened.
Desperate measures for desperate times.
The big winner, Glencore?

 

[sptrawler]

The thing is from a small investors perspective, it has put nickel in the hsadlights, many investors would not have given nickel a second thought now they know it is worth serious money.

 

[frugal.rock]

Must be about time for nickel price to start kicking off again. Not alot in the chart to advocate this though.

Surprised it has been so subdued of late.
I guess it's because you can't eat it or burn it as fuel...

Weekly



Daily

 

[peter2]

From Kitco.com. A bit of evidence that the PON might bounce soon. LME stores of nickel have been declining for the past year.

 

[mullokintyre]

Nyrstar has shut down about 2% of the worlds Nickel refining capacity due to soaring energy costs.
That will probably help the price.
Mick

 

[InsvestoBoy]

From Kitco.com. A bit of evidence that the PON might bounce soon. LME stores of nickel have been declining for the past year.

View attachment 145897

Not that I'm prognosticating about Nickel supply either way, but market participants are withdrawing stocks of lots of metals, e.g. copper from LME because of the zinc fiasco...so I wouldn't necessarily put too much weight behind those charts as being able to infer the drawdown of aggregate supplies.

 

[frugal.rock]

Have been thinking about getting prepared for a reversal.
Must be getting closer.