pixel
DIY Trader
- Joined
- 3 February 2010
- Posts
- 5,359
- Reactions
- 345
Hey Pixel, you didn't do a very good job of blurring out iinet. Best wishes with your next ISP.
Actually, it was Telstra's techs that couldn't get the landline stable enough for ADSL2. They told me our copper was so badly corroded that it would have to be replaced, but as NBN would come in 3 or 4 years, Telstra won't spend a cent any more. After all, the USO stipulates phone service. iiNet even put me on one of Telstra's DSLAMs and a "stable" profile. Result: 630 dropouts in a month, 111 peak on a single day! As that still didn't fix my problem, I got the TIO involved, and received my Internet subscription refunded back to April; that's when the trouble started.
Malcolm Turnbull's response,
http://www.afr.com/p/technology/turnbull_hits_back_at_nbn_backers_A02PyZx3X9ivGn8rLd7RnM
Who would have thought there would be a coalition policy that ignores the advice and opinions of the industry experts....
http://nbnmyths.wordpress.com/what-do-the-experts-say/
Except when messed about with by NSW and Vic politicians in the 1980's, ye olde public utilities generally always were pretty conscious of market forces, something which seemed to bewilder their "free market" critics who never understood why so-called monopolies did in fact need to advertise on account of competitive pressures.It is a strange world we live in when the ALP seems to be guided by market forces much more than the LNP.
Private ownership ends up costing the community more for the service, is less technically efficient in operation and ends up with the physical infrastructure in ruin or damn close to it.
The crux of the problem is that infrastructure is a long term proposition. In 2013 we are still very heavily reliant in infrastructure which commenced construction in the 1940's, 50's and 60's. That's where most of our energy and water comes from, and much of our transport infrastructure too. And there's nothing wrong with that, if something lasts 100 years then there's no reason at all why we shouldn't still be using 60 year old infrastructure. The trouble is, private enterprise has a strong dislike of investing now, with no hope of even one cent of income for 5 - 10 years and break even being 30 years away. Things like that are better done by government authorities run by competent people and placed out of easy reach of politicians - the old state utility model.
Leave business to run business and governments to run national / state / city infrastructure in my opinion and don't mix the two.
This is going to be a mess, politically the noalition cant continue the roll out as planned because they fought so hard against it that to turn around and support it would make them look stupid...so they will have to tinker with it, so it can be re-branded as their own.
And that's going to lead to a half arsed NBN.
So you are saying for 99% of users,
They will only be able to D/L pr0n and pirated movies 2x faster than now and not 4x
and their productivity will remain exactly the same
and their consumption will increase at a slower rate than before..
Not sure how this is a negative.
MW
(Working in the real world)
Crux of the problem there is that it's been "dumbed down" to a somewhat ridiculous extent, largely to reduce the cost of training.These days the level 1 tech for Telstra are all contractors who have barely a clue as to how to fix a fault.
...And that's going to lead to a half arsed NBN.
Chaos: Coalition a total shambles on NBN policy | Delimiter
Up until now, I’ve been willing to give the Coalition the benefit of the doubt when it comes to national broadband policy, due primarily to the intelligence and experience of its Shadow Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull. But events last week starkly demonstrated the Coalition is currently a complete mess when it comes to this critical portfolio.
Two weeks ago, from an outside perspective, the Coalition more or less appeared to have overcome the internal disagreements which have plagued Tony Abbott’s front bench about the future of the NBN. Turnbull’s vision of an expedited, more inexpensive upgrade of Telstra’s copper network to fibre to the node technology, using the bones of NBN Co to do so, and maintaining existing HFC cable infrastructure as well as much of the satellite and wireless components of the NBN, appeared to have gained ascendancy over the “demolish the NBN”, “white elephant” rhetoric of less technically minded Coalition politicians such as Abbott and Shadow Treasurer Joe Hockey.
Today, we’re right back where we started: In complete chaos. Turnbull is demonstrating his technical and commercial ineptitude by pitching a technology to the electorate which most Australians have considered deprecated for most of the past decade, and Abbott is back on the bandwagon about how expensive the NBN “white elephant” is, despite the fact that it is actually slated to deliver the Government a long-term return on its investment.
....
But all of the signals coming out of the Coalition so far are that, when it comes to national telecommunications policy, it’s not capable of organising that proverbial chook raffle; let alone taking charge of something as complex and important as the NBN.
Nearly fell off my zimmer frame when I spotted this,great line So-C.Dude you have no idea at all...it may be all about handicapped animal snuff pr0n at your house but out in the real world its not.
I don't think the benefits of the NBN will be realized for a number of years. Libs should bite the bullet and be supporting NBN imo as it will foster new business directions.
They will more then likely leave it alone if they win the election.
I'm with you on that, I think if the libs get in and it makes sense to keep rolling it out, they will.
All they will say is it is past the point of rollng it back.
At this point in time it is about winning an election, if the coalition back flipped at the moment, labor would carve them up.IMO
Once again attaining political power trumps supporting sound policy.
There'd be short term pain in a backflip, but it just might be the circuit breaker needed to shake his Dr NO image.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?