This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

NBN Rollout Scrapped

Jump to new

Sydboy don't get too out of shape, Labor sold off plenty as well.
I bought into the first sale of Telstra and the opposition (Labor) said it was sold too cheap. So the next tranche was sold at $7.40, I'm still waiting for it to hit that again.
Labor sold CBA at $5 first issue, $10 second tranche, I fail to see your reasoning.
Should Howard have split Telstra up and recieved less, or was Keating remiss in selling CBA cheap?
Maybe someone made a fortune out of shares?
 
Here you go GG, some more high praise from the private sector for you:


..... full story here: http://www.brw.com.au/p/tech-gadgets/nbn_brilliant_foundation_says_berners_LWyBHFJtdUoOi2M2QLpDZN

 

The issue I have is converting a public monopoly into a private one.

While the sale price would have been less, a sale of Telstra retail and wholesale would have been much better for consumers and business due to the increased levels of competition. A Telstra wholesale would have been similar to the current NBN. Both have a self interest to get the highest number of users on the network. What retail company gives them the user is of no relevance as each one will pay the same price.

Cut over to Telstra and the situation we have now I think anyone who has a bit of an understanding of how the industry works would agree that Telstra has abused its monopoly and we as consumers have suffered from higher prices. So the reality is the higher sale price has been at the cost of higher consumer prices.

Oh, and now Lord Bullturn is complaining the Govt is selling the 4G mobile spectrum at too high a price. Hmmm. AT&T just paid the equivalent of $1.80 per MHz per subscriber, so seems we're not being ripped off too much
 



We lost our cable internet the last couple of days presumably to the bad weather. Our only access to the internet has been through mobile data on our phones using WIRELESS. It worked well.

It made me wonder if fibre optic will fare any better in these bad weather conditions. It seems not according to the two articles below. And yet isn't the plan for fibre optic cables to even replace our land lines? What's the point of that if they are going to just go down when we have heavy rain and people lose both internet and land lines? We are spending billions of dollars on this?

Telstra has flown techicians in to repair a flood-damaged fibre optic cable between Gladstone and Bundaberg in Queensland that it says "carries much of the state's communications needs".
Click to expand...

Read more:
Telstra flies in crew to repair flood-damaged fibre

and previously in 2011:

Telstra has repaired a flood-damaged fibre optic cable on the NSW far south coast that cut landline access to the Triple Zero emergency network.
Click to expand...

Read more:
Telstra fibre optic cable damaged in NSW storms
 
Not only that, but Telstra have profit mined (run down) the copper network to the point that replacement would soon be required even if fibre and the NBN hadn't come along.

The NBN is as much about bailing out a failed privately owned communications network as it is about introducing new technology.

I'm all for private enterprise in its' place but it has a rotten track record when it comes to infrastructure things like electricity, water etc and the evidence is pointing in much the same direction with communications networks. The trouble is, these big corporations tend to focus on this year and next versus the 30 - 100 year life of major infrastructure assets. That leads directly toward running things into the ground so as to extract profits more quickly and ends with a government bail-out.

Communications - being bailed out now.

Electricity - been done once before and we're on the track toward a second go.

Transport - blatant anti-competitive conduct props up private roads in NSW. Meanwhile look what happened in Tas with rail - run down by Pacific National to the point that trains couldn't actually make it from one end of the state to the other without derailing.

As I said, I'm all for private enterprise but I just don't think the model fits well with long life cycle assets. It tends to be too short term focused and that doesn't end well.
 

+1

Add in that sometimes it's better to have the Govt do it, even if less efficient than the private sector, because at the end of the day they only need to break even and fund maintenance, while the private sector needs to make a 15-20% return on equity else they wont invest.

That's where the NBN wins. Low cost of Govt debt, mandated to not make more that 7%, excess profits ploughed back into either extending the fibre foot print or reducing access fees.

I get annoyed the LNP keep bagging the NBN yet they have a policy that's not much more developed than a few slogans on a napkin. There's nothing to actually compare to the NBN, and as yet the FTTN network they propose is still uncertain as to being a core or non core promise.

If the LNP do go the way of FTTN I will love to see the reaction of their supporters as the devil in the detail becomes well known.

There's no acknowledgement by Bullturn that when a tech goes to move a customer pair to the node, that the records are so bad it is going to be trial and error to get a service working. he doesn't even provide an estimate to how much copper will be replaced with fibre once they start the rollout. he's not even been willing to say which areas currently getting fibre are going to end up on fixed wireless instead.
 

Optical fibre is not generally damaged by water, unless that water washes away the soil covering it.

To repeat what I wrote above:

The optical fibres cables damaged in the stories above also carry the traffic for local wireless networks. The mobile network towers are joined to the rest of our phone/internet infrastructure by optical fibre cables. The same optical fibre cables that join telephone exchanges to the wider network. So when a transit cable serving an area is cut, then all phone/internet services (be they copper, NBN or wireless) will be cut, assuming they are from the same provider. (ie if Optus have their own transit cable, then their mobile might still work if a Telstra cable is damaged).

Mobile phone towers also require large amounts of electricity. Major towers have battery backups and/or generators, but if they cannot be refuelled or the tower base itself is flooded, then the network goes down.

And, once again, a cellular wireless network (no matter what the technology) is not physically capable of replacing the data load currently carried by our fixed networks. There is simply not enough bandwidth in the radio spectrum for this to occur, unless we plan rewriting the laws of physics. It's not a limitation you can fix by throwing money at it.

Urban and suburban areas require fixed-line networks for these technical reasons, and it is why there is no country on the planet where urban/suburban fixed line networks are being replaced with wireless.

In rural areas where population density is low, wireless systems can cope. And in such areas, the NBN uses wireless or satellite as part of the policy.
 

Yeap, so no different from any previous govt, only they're giving people in remote areas a shot at joining the 21st century. You've either got a govt that thinks of the future but screws things up or one that sits on its hands and watches the place rot. Hang em, but don't hang em for the one thing they might be doing right. If we had a bit more forward thinking and a bit less bleating the country might be worth a jot.
 

Well written.
 

Cant help but wonder what mite of been had Howard stepped aside before APEC, with Costello backing a FTTN project with a 10 > 12 billion spend and passing Kyoto and promising at the least some backing for renewable's etc.

Perhaps It didn't have to end in tears.
 

Occasionally I pass by this thread, have a read and move on but when a post like this comes all I can say is

I agree 100%
 

Spot on, the splash of cash and monty python style running of infrastructure spending, really didn't have to happen.
It ended up as an excercise, in giving the teenage kids control of the family budget.
The result is as expected, internet gaming and social networking, is the winner.
 
NBN Co have just announced a huge boost to the country/remote NBN wireless and satellite services, from a previous maximum of 12Mbps down, 1Mbps up to 25Mbps down and 5Mbps up.

http://www.afr.com/p/technology/nbn_to_boost_wireless_satellite_zEe93EbV2yN97sUZgKnYGN

 
Interesting article in the blatantly biased ABC online.

A common complaint about the NBN is that it costs too much, or is expensive.

If you look at the CAPEX of just Telstra and Optus over the last 10 years (similar time frame to the NBN rollout) well Telstra spent $36B inflation adjusted and Optus spent $11.4B.

Admittedly a lot of that spending would have been in the mobile space, but it does go to show that the NBN isn't ridiculously expensive.
 
There won't be any problem for either Government or Broadband service providers.
I requested clarification from the TIO about the legal obligations of an ISP. Answer: All we, the peepull, are entitled to is a landline telephone service. Neither mobile phones nor internet need work.

 

While what the TIO has told you is correct, if you could show that the issue had not been resolved by your previous ISP, but since migrating to the new ISP the problems you had experienced had cleared, then at the very least they could probably get any penalties for early termination refunded.

The USO only specifies either 14.4 or 28.8 Kbs data dialup speeds.

I would also add the USO isn't really relevant to the NBN, but at least if you have an NBN service you ave a much greater claim to a certain speed level - may not be able to complain about peak time speeds, but if you could show out of peak times that you are not getting the speeds you pay for, then you'd have a good case with the TIO.
 
Hey Pixel, you didn't do a very good job of blurring out iinet. Best wishes with your next ISP.
 
Finally getting a little clarity from the Bullturn

Shadow Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull has confirmed that metropolitan areas of Australia in the HFC cable footprint of Telstra and Optus would not immediately receive the Coalition’s planned fibre to the node upgrade if it wins Government and did not commit to deploying FTTN infrastructure in those areas in the long-term.

The shadow minister said:

“An ideal scenario would be that you would – well what you would certainly do is you would not prioritise areas where HFC is,” said Turnbull. “You wouldn’t be overbuilding the HFC areas in the near term because they’re getting very good service already. The Government, however, is over-building the HFC areas.”

Considering HFC is not available to MDUs and Optus has in some areas stopped allowing new users to connect to their cable for internet, seems like large swathes of capital cities will not be getting an internet upgrade any time soon. So much for a faster rollout. So the LNP NoBN will now exclude approx 25% of households as that is the HFC footprint.

Will be very interesting to see how that goes down in voter land as understanding percolates through the no longer upgrading suburbs. It also seems that current NoBN policy has no intention to upgrade internet access in HFC areas.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
The Australian Human Rights Commission: A national disgrace
3 4 5
Replies
85
Views
15K
Tisme
A
National Broadband Network
23 24 25
Replies
483
Views
57K
sptrawler
ASF Mark III
7 8 9
Replies
173
Views
44K
mr. jeff
A
Money management
Replies
0
Views
4K
absolute1
A
R
Deception: use + abuse of information by governments + terrorists
Replies
2
Views
5K
reichstag911
R
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...