Logique
Investor
- Joined
- 18 April 2007
- Posts
- 4,290
- Reactions
- 768
Agree with you on both posts.LOL
If it goes past your house, get it connected.
As Knobby say's it will cost you a lot more later on, when the tax payers aren't paying for it.
I don't agree with it ,I think the money would be better spent on more productive infrastructure. But I will get it put in my house at no cost if it goes past.
The PIIGS if they could go back might have taken a different view to more debt. The starting point is to make better use of what we allready have/borrowed.It was good to hear Jeff Kennett saying that now is the perfect time for Australia to borrow money at low interest rates and fix the place up. Too many rent seekers who like the present situation.
LEIGH SALES: Given what's potentially ahead, how effectively do you think that successive governments have managed the proceeds of the resources boom?
DAVID MURRAY: Well I don't think they have because they haven't addressed this fundamental shape of the Australian economy. And what that shape implies is that we need capital from the rest of the world, we have a high operating leverage problem in the budget, that is, the welfare costs in Australia are so high that when - forget the boom, commodities always change prices. And a seller of commodities is a price-taker whereas we have a high fixed-cost in our budget, mostly in welfare, which is now up to 100 per cent of the personal tax take. So, with those problems and a persistent current account deficit, Australia is not a country that can afford very much public debt, yet the public debt's been rising.
I was, wondering what the current thinking is, for those following all this, what is expected to happen in regard to
- what will be the price point of telephone and internet service by comparison to existing fixed line/ADSL2+
- when the Coalition comes in, if you're not connected to NBN by then, are you ever likely to be
- what will removal of copper lines elsewhere mean to those remaining on fixed line/ADSL internet, technically and with costs
If the NBN is to offer comparable service at price, then certainly I would want them to connect me on the way past.
NBNMyths is the roll out still on schedule, or is it running behind?
As far as I know, apart from the initial and announced 9-month delay relating to getting the Telstra deal sorted, it's on schedule.
After the Telstra deal was finally signed, they announced a revised 3-year schedule about 8 months ago, which has not changed.
Well, I hope their protests are heard all the way to Canberra.Two suburbs in Townsville, namely Mundingburra and Aitkenvale has NBN at thier door and in the local paper today they have been told they will have no alterantive but switch very shortly to NBN at $80 per month.
Two suburbs in Townsville, namely Mundingburra and Aitkenvale has NBN at thier door and in the local paper today they have been told they will have no alterantive but switch very shortly to NBN at $80 per month.
Most of them are only paying $29.95 per month and I think they about to start a riot over the monopoly created by this inept Labor Government.
Please don't come back and tell me they will get a faster service, we already know that. The thing is they are happy with their Telstra provider at $29.95 even though it may be a bit slower.
townsvillebulletin.com.au said:A basic internet package with 50 gigabytes of data downloads at the fastest speed of 100 megabits per second will set back internet users $59.95 a month on a 24-month contract.
Telco rival Optus released their pricing for the NBN earlier this month with plans starting from $59.
Two suburbs in Townsville, namely Mundingburra and Aitkenvale has NBN at thier door and in the local paper today they have been told they will have no alterantive but switch very shortly to NBN at $80 per month.
Most of them are only paying $29.95 per month and I think they about to start a riot over the monopoly created by this inept Labor Government.
Please don't come back and tell me they will get a faster service, we already know that. The thing is they are happy with their Telstra provider at $29.95 even though it may be a bit slower.
Well, I hope their protests are heard all the way to Canberra.
Such an increase would render many low income folk unable to have the internet and is entirely contrary to what was promised.
Perhaps NBN Myths might care to comment?
Is that so...this from the local paper
Forced to pay 80 a month hey?
http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/article/2012/02/28/309461_news.html
A nice mix of comments at the bottom of the page...mostly NBN positive.
So_Cynical, your link appears a bit out dated (FEB 28 2012) my friend and what you read then would have been Labor Party spin. Good try old fellow!!!!!!
My link was published yesterday Saturday 13/10/2012 and much more up to date.
http://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/article/2012/10/13/367611_news.html
The journalist in the article above I think has compared Telstra's cheapest stand alone broadband plan ($29.95pm) to their cheapest NBN plan ($80pm).
http://www.telstra.com.au/internet/home-broadband-bigpond-elite-plans/
http://www.telstra.com.au/internet/national-broadband-network/our-plans/
The journalist in the article above I think has compared Telstra's cheapest stand alone broadband plan ($29.95pm) to their cheapest NBN plan ($80pm).
http://www.telstra.com.au/internet/home-broadband-bigpond-elite-plans/
http://www.telstra.com.au/internet/national-broadband-network/our-plans/
Will there be a 'naked NBN' option? Or, will someone like internode/dodo have a package for $60 which includes line and NBN in one price?
Criticism accepted, NBN Myths. I should know better than to just believe such an allegation.The article is just a little more NBN FUD, lapped up by Noco, Julia et al.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?