- Joined
- 28 October 2008
- Posts
- 8,609
- Reactions
- 39
You haven't looked very closely at the data.
Individual suburb delays are up to 4 months as noted by the article author but the overall delay is 1 month.
You haven't looked very closely at the data.Why would you encourage the NBN to replicate infrastructure when the FTTN trial rollout is at least 4 months behind schedule.
You haven't looked very closely at the data.
Individual suburb delays are up to 4 months as noted by the article author but the overall delay is 1 month.
You're an intelligent boy Syd.How do you get to an overall 1 month delay when half of the trial rollout is 2+ months late?
...quality of this network is not fully known as there has been limited opportunity to evaluate the physical infrastructure at significant scale.
However, it is known that there is significant work required to remove broadband blockers from the copper network,
Did you see the cost per premise for FTTP ?This morning the NBN company released its latest corporate plan. The document reveals up to 550,000 less Australian premises would receive the full Fibre to the Premises rollout than had been previously been planned under the Coalition’s Multi-Technology Mix, with the project’s funding requirement also blowing out by between $5 billion and $15 billion.
Did you see the cost per premise for FTTP ?
If the plan is to be believed — and the Minister strongly emphasised today that it is — then the NBN Strategic Review underestimated the peak funding required to complete the NBN project by at least $5 billion and perhaps as much as $15 billion over the life of the project.
“The cost of the Coalition’s second rate NBN started out at $29.5 billion in April 2013, it blew out to $41 billion in December 2013, increased again to $42 billion in August 2014 and today it was announced that it will now cost up to $56 billion.”
the company estimated that about 37,200 premises would be declared ready for service in September this year, with a further 35,200 to be added in October. However, the site reported last week that the latest monthly ready for service plan released by the NBN company showed a mere 2,100 premises would be declared ready for service in September — and only 9,600 expected premises expected to be activated in October.
If it was redacted, I wouldn't have seen it.The redacted info or the stuff being released for public viewing?
If it was redacted, I wouldn't have seen it.
Then Fletcher, in February 2014 said in a public forum, in a direct response to my question, and in front of dozens of witnesses, that NBN Co’s internal review of Labor’s NBN had costed it at $56 billion, much closer to Labor’s figure than the inflated estimate the Coalition took to the election.
When I quizzed him on the disparity between the Coalition’s $90 billion estimate of a FTTP network and the much lower NBN Co estimate (made by the management team the Coalition had put into place) of $56 billion, the best Fletcher could say was that the Coalition estimate “may have been a little high”.
Well done Syd.So how does one come up with a figure of $1600 for FTTN.......
Well done Syd.
You found the page and would have noted the FTTP per premise capex in the same table on that page.
My real problem is not the delay and the higher costs, but the fact that for all of that we get a network that will not deliver us the capacity and quality needed to build a modern economy and society.
Syd,
Look at LTD performance on the next page.
You'll note that's not a forecast.
"We now put out a forecast for the next 18 months, and probably in a month and a half, you're going to see a three-year view," he said. "You'll be able to go onto the website, at that point, look up your suburb, and see exactly when that's going to occur, or in the rough time frame as to when construction will start."
Another scathing assessment of the Turnbull mess from Paul Budde being less diplomatic than usual, even he has had a gut full of the imbeciles and lies.
http://www.buddeblog.com.au/frompaulsdesk/the-nbn-more-lies-leading-us-from-bad-to-worse/
Nailed it.
Paul Budde said:It becomes clear that this government didn’t have a clue about its proposed ‘cheaper and faster option’. It was nothing more than political rhetoric.
Aside from the delay, the government has now also been forced to admit that its second-rate version of the NBN could cost as much as $56 billion. If it was not so sad it would be funny.
What FTTN may ultimately cost doesn't change what FTTP is costing.Send a bit unfair when the FTTN COP had this caveat
(e) The CPP excludes the impact of initial trial arrangements, where costs are not in line with long term expectations (due to low volume, and bespoke commercial and delivery arrangements), and excludes contingency.
There's no transparency into how those CPP figures were calculated.
What FTTN may ultimately cost doesn't change what FTTP is costing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?