- Joined
- 20 July 2021
- Posts
- 12,190
- Reactions
- 16,956
this NOT financial advice , but maybe you should consider is investing in a specific ETF ( or more ) worth the tax offset ( of going through a super fund , SMSF or not )I've been doing more research and I recall my accountant was mentioning about investing within your super and you pay a lower tax rate. So I could invest my index fund within my super. Has anyone done this? From what I can tell, how it works is that each super has their own fund, and you can't choose your own index to invest through them? Which I guess makes sense, considering it wouldn't be their product.
I guess the other option is SMSF, but sounded pretty complex when I look at it a while back. My accountant is charging high fees I think, which I might post to get a second opinion.
To clarify, is this what you mean? If I invest in a seperate ETF outside of super, I will be taxed, but if I invest in my supers product I won't be taxed at pension age. So I'm betting that the money that I lose on tax on investing outside of super, will be less than the money I would have made from investing inside super (my superannuations product), is this correct?this NOT financial advice , but maybe you should consider is investing in a specific ETF ( or more ) worth the tax offset ( of going through a super fund , SMSF or not )
some ETFs pay franking credits and depending on your strategy MIGHT be better in a standalone portfolio outside a formal super fund
some ETFs offer dividend reinvestment plan , AND you can buy on-market ( and reduce/sell as you wish
doing this will also give you the option of putting NEW cash into a different ETF whether issued by a different company or just a different focus and picking the times for a strategy deviation
inside a formal super fund puts you at the mercy of Government policies
yes ,To clarify, is this what you mean? If I invest in a seperate ETF outside of super, I will be taxed, but if I invest in my supers product I won't be taxed at pension age. So I'm betting that the money that I lose on tax on investing outside of super, will be less than the money I would have made from investing inside super (my superannuations product), is this correct?
Ah ok, thanks for the info! I forgot to take into account the franking credits, but I guess after that, there is the capital gains tax. I'll weigh it up and see what to do. Was good to have this discussion, important decision to make!yes ,
you will be taxed BUT get full franking credits ( if there are any ) the offset on that is you only pay a brokerage fee if you buy or sell ( with my two platforms )
ALSO you have the choice of participating in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan ( DRP ) if they have one which allows you to accumulate without incurring extra brokerage/fee
in theory you are correct
however in my experience i did WAY better investing the cash in AMP shares ( at the time ) than when AMP managed the money inside my compulsory super
i strongly advise you to crunch YOUR numbers for yourself , and consider what will be best for YOU ( and seek advice from your accountant to confirm your chosen strategy )
maybe your super fund didn't deserve to get hauled over the coals like Hayne did to AMP ( and others )
and while your investments are trapped inside a formal super , the government is likely to change the goal-posts several times before you retire )
and BTW my employer-run super fund seemed to go nowhere before they offloaded it to AMP
Just something to think about the use of franking credits inside and outside of super. Lets say you receive $1000 ff dividend.Ah ok, thanks for the info! I forgot to take into account the franking credits, but I guess after that, there is the capital gains tax. I'll weigh it up and see what to do. Was good to have this discussion, important decision to make!
depending on your goals , no capital gains tax until you sell , currently ( AND keep an ear out for a possible unrealized capital gains tax , which keeps on being bandied about in political circles , that would be an absolute game-changer )Ah ok, thanks for the info! I forgot to take into account the franking credits, but I guess after that, there is the capital gains tax. I'll weigh it up and see what to do. Was good to have this discussion, important decision to make!
Will do, thanks!Just something to think about the use of franking credits inside and outside of super. Lets say you receive $1000 ff dividend.
- Outside of super the franking credit gets added onto the $1000 and is your income for tax purposes. If you earn an average salary that franking usually gets paid all back in tax. Nett result $1000.
- Inside super in pension mode 0% tax paid so the franking credit of $428.57 is all kept so your total income is $1428.57. If in accumulation mode then halve that $428.57 figure.
Will take this into account, thanks!depending on your goals , no capital gains tax until you sell , currently ( AND keep an ear out for a possible unrealized capital gains tax , which keeps on being bandied about in political circles , that would be an absolute game-changer )
now IF you are young(ish ) you might chose to DRP until you retire , opt out of the DRP on retirement and just receive cash dividends ... ( keeping the portfolio intact )
again that plan may/may not suit you
you can have your compulsory super the normal way and have this other portfolio as a safety line ( in case your formal super isn't enough )
good luck
a bold assumption , but i hope you have underestimated the returns ( ANYTHING can happen in the markets )(I also am assuming this is going to be the continued rate of return for the next 30+ years).
You have to compare apples with apples. IVV = 100% US stock index. HostPlus balance option only about 40% International exposure. That is where the difference lies. If you do an analysis of the volatility of those two to achieve those returns then HostPlus will be along way ahead.Hey @qldfrog @divs4ever , I think I found my answer. Investing outside of super for ETF sake makes more sense given the higher rate of return (not taking franking credits into account here because they don't apply to s&p stocks even with an Australian ETF product 'IVV' index)-(I also am assuming this is going to be the continued rate of return for the next 30+ years).
These numbers may be slightly off but should demonstrate the point:
IVV index rate of return last 20 years - 10.41%
Hostplus - 7.88%
I asked ChatGPT to do some crunching for me, and here is what is spat out. I'm of course betting, that the IVV index will continue to outperform my super.
The best course of action seems to be a SMSF, which I'll likely do once I have a lot more money and a significantly higher income. I don't think the fees from my accountant justifies them opening up and managing a SMSF for me, especially considering when **** hits the fan I can't blame then and they certainly won't take the blame lol.
Here's some screenshots. (last screenshot, I redid the calculation based on the last 20 years performance of IVV and hostplus) View attachment 195732View attachment 195731View attachment 195733View attachment 195734View attachment 195735View attachment 195737
Yea not gonna happen. If the government of the day hasn't got the balls to change the GST rate and get rid of all other taxes (which would fix most of their problems) they are not going to make major changes like that to super, sure a bit of tinkering around the edges but nothing major.BTW the Hostplus calculation assumes no change to the tax impacts when you start dipping into that cash after you retire
spoiler alert , there are mutterings about your super nest egg being locked up for life but you get income payments from the investment nest egg , over your retirement life
Three underrated investment risks in retirement
Three underrated investment risks in retirement
Your chances of having a comfortable retirement are not only dictated by your super fund's investment returns. Investors must also consider the risks of longevity, inflation, and not sticking to the plan.www.firstlinks.com.au
this website can be immensely helpful in various ways
( it is updated weekly )
The real issue is not performance, it is freedom of access: who cares if you have even $1 million more if it is locked: fully no access, or access limit when you need itYea not gonna happen. If the government of the day hasn't got the balls to change the GST rate and get rid of all other taxes (which would fix most of their problems) they are not going to make major changes like that to super, sure a bit of tinkering around the edges but nothing major.
more likely after 70 or even 75 ( or maybe never ) the way the trend is goingand do you really think you will access your super before 65?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?