SKC
Ree basket price:$62
Production cost:$10
Share on issue: 1.8 bill
Working on $45 kg profit and stage 1 production capacity of 11 million kg's of ree.
$45 x 11,000,000 = $495 mill profit per annum.
$495 mill / 1.8 bill share on issue = 27.5 cent profit per share.
Pick your PE ratio 8,10,12,14 some mining companies run in the 20's.
The Malaysia situation is bad for the company but it doesn't warrant such a steep discount imo.
The variable that matters the most is clearly the realisable basket price. The market appears to be thinking that the additional supply from LYC / MCP and others will push the price down, and so the margin will not be as generous as we see here.
A couple of questions for you and other LYC followers:
- I understand LYC has pre-committed sales contracts lined up for much of its production. Are there information on the price? Is the price fixed or whatever the market is?
- You mentioned China will be net importer in 5 years. Can you point me to a reference?
Just a note... I guess I am trying to see if there are valid reasons for the current share price. If I can dispute those reasons than I can build an investment case. Rather than a different approach where one looks for reasons to support certain valuation, and risks confirmation bias.
A couple of questions for you and other LYC followers:
- I understand LYC has pre-committed sales contracts lined up for much of its production. Are there information on the price? Is the price fixed or whatever the market is?
- You mentioned China will be net importer in 5 years. Can you point me to a reference?
A couple of questions for you and other LYC followers:
- I understand LYC has pre-committed sales contracts lined up for much of its production. Are there information on the price? Is the price fixed or whatever the market is?
- You mentioned China will be net importer in 5 years. Can you point me to a reference?
This question to LYC observers is probably laziness on my part.
What is Plan B if the Malaysia Solution goes the same way as the Gillard/Bowen deal and they put a stop to it?
I saw a report on SBS tonight. That looks like huge capex involved, so starting again somewhere doesn't sound great. The report suggested the dispute was over the waste disposal issue, given some radioactivity.
Is there a Plan B whereby LYC simply alters the waste disposal part of the proposal (or the Malaysia Government sets those conditions)?
In other words, if the SP is going to tank, what is the level of the downside risk?
As we wait for a potential announcement on the appeal this week, here's an interesting article to tide you over:
http://www.theborneopost.com/2012/06/10/malaysia-going-for-green-vehicles/
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
"Malaysia has announced plans to boost its auto*motive sector through the production of electric cars, hoping to both develop a lucra*tive export trade while actively combating carbon emissions at home."
"government planning to announce a major policy shift that will promote the production and domestic use of electric vehicles."
"This growth would be un*derpinned by a higher level of foreign direct investment and government efforts to encourage original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to set up operations in Malaysia."
“Meeting vehicle standards for energy-efficient vehicles in Malaysia means bringing new technologies into the country”
"If Malaysia is to achieve its ambitious target of cutting emissions by 40 per cent, it will need to move quickly to generate industry interest and acceptance of the new product among the public."
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
[Currently holding. DYOR]
All things ready to go and someone has their foot on the brake.
...he protesters were a small group of ignorant idiots?Now it is clear and can't be ignored any more: they are a nationwide movement....
Kuantan residents appeal was dismissed by the Minister
Ministry of Science by conditions to Linus
[Magazine has Xue Fei Compilation] science, technology and Innovation (MOSTI) dismissed the appeal against the Lynas rare earth plant temporary operating license, except set the additional two conditions, that is, to Linus rare earth plant mentioned Kuantan residents to ensure the waste storage tank does not leak radioactive waste, and offered to control dust to be distributed to the emergency plan in the air and the environment. Save Malaysia, the termination of Linus "(SMSL) The Chairman Chen Wende told the independent news online, the organization received the Minister of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) Mai Ximu Maximus, Ongkili letter to inform the residents of three Kuantan the outcome of the appeal. The letter said that the residents of the requests and evidence submitted does not enable the Department to withdraw the temporary operating license issued to the Lynas rare earth plant. However, the Minister in the letter that, under the Atomic Energy Licensing Act 1984 (Atomic Energy Licencing Act, 1984) empowers the Minister's powers, the additional two conditions attached to the Lynas rare earth plant, they complied with these two conditions will issue a temporary operating license to Linus.
no, that was ARU old man
It is a handful of people, the appeal was made by 3 residents. The small SMSL group just joined the larger opposition protest because they could.
Anyway, according to this Chinese/Malaysian news agency the appeal was dismissed: http://www.merdekareview.com/news.php?n=25256
Google Translated:
Old man lol?
Your 33 and your calling me old lol?
PinguPingu still having this reality problem? :1zhelp:
Hope it doesn't become too expensive 4U.
According to news sources we can read...
"controlling dust" and "immobilzing waste"
Haha, reality problem? Not at all! I trade in and out of Lynas often.
Indeed, past the first few lines would be great
That Lynas already has the answers for, which is handy
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/15/malaysia-lynas-idUSL3E8HF33720120615?type=companyNews
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?