- Joined
- 1 October 2008
- Posts
- 3,733
- Reactions
- 391
Well let's see.That's a Non Sequitur Tech/a and you have zero basis for saying that.
So clearly a personal sleight which is out if context hereI am sorry if you are offended that I have reservations about your mentor's character, but it is based in my experience.
Which has no place here---in my opinion. Why did you bring it up?But FYI, I have no challenge with Radge's education program. I think it is good and I have not criticized the information. It is about his behaviour on this site, and elsewhere.
Within context no problemWhy are you happy for people to criticize other spruikers here (and participate mightily yourself), yet get all huffy when your own spruiker cops a minor sleight?
Nah.Hypocrisy??
Well let's see.
So clearly a personal sleight which is out if context here
Which has no place here---in my opinion. Why did you bring it up?
TThere have been no " personal " criticism directed toward anyone here that I can see!
Within context no problem
Other than that it's a personal sleight
" Tall poppy syndrome "
Nah.
Sorry Tech, as it was you who started spruiking him once his name was mentioned, it was very much in context.
YOU, in effect, brought it up.
As there is a long and noble tradition of slamming spruikers and spammers, which you are one of the main proponents of, St Nick is fair game.
But I repeat, no issue with the quality of his offerings, just the spamming and subsequent dummy spit on this board.
FFS, I even complimented the title of the book.
If it is tall poppy syndrome as you claim, then you are massively guilty of the same as you have slagged off heaps of "educators" here.
Do you have a man-crush on him or something?
Published in Technology Review, June/July, 1980, 16-24
The Seer-Sucker Theory: The Value of Experts in Forecasting
J. Scott Armstrong
Dont know that that is necessary.
Trust is earnt as is respect.
Should anyone be looking for a mentor on how to simultaneously ride a bicycle without a bicycle helmet, smoke a cohiba and eat a battered fish on a bicycle path full of coppers and lycra clad peletonics, and not get stopped out by market forces, I have a course starting on April 1, 2013.
Cost is $15,000 if you register before March 1.
$7,000 if you register after that date.
gg
Isn't Radge a spruiker too?
I'll weigh in here
Spruiker
=gives impression they are really, really good trader.
= sells over priced course on secret to trade to make promised fortune.
= claims to trade said method personally and making a killing.
= never and I mean never gives results real time or other of personal account
= never and I mean never declares own holdings or trades ongoing.
I could go but I am sure everyone gets the point
I know there was a massive falling out on this site (don't know the details) with a number of people and his name became he who must not be mentioned.
If I remember EW was at the centre of the dispute (who would have thought)
Have known of and or known Radge like Tech for must be going on 15 or more years.
I have only ever known Radge to act with complete transparency and integrity whether talking about trading or personal stuff.
He has only ever charged prices he would have been prepared to pay himself and given away massive amounts of time and information for free simply because he thought he wouldn't pay for it so he couldn't charge for it.
Radge is certainly a significant part (not all) of my own marathon to become profitable.
I support and would recommend him 100%. There is only one other person in the game I would say the same and she no longer runs education (it messed up her trading).
Is Radge a spruiker = no
Too much personal information coming out here as respective posters try to defend their friendships with a respected trader/publisher/business person. Totally off topic and unnecessary.
Perhaps time a responsible moderator stepped in and flushed out the off topic posts? Joe.. Prawn...System..??
On topic comments in regard the pro's and con's of the Louise Bedford course, including objective comparisons with other trader/authors/programs such as Nick Radge, Alan Hull, Guppy etc etc ...keep them.
Personal exchanges loaded with personal information, flush them out as irrelevent and off topic. No offence. Nothing personal. Nothing to be gained and totally irrelevent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?