Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,843
- Reactions
- 10,682
Good on ya Bracksy, your a ... legend.
A nice level playing field we have with other economies don't we?
Yeah, let's keep digging up the ground and exporting it, after all it's easy and it will last forever won't it?
So when the resource boom finishes we can become the next NZ, and be content with our sheep and sercive industry.
When manufacturing skills or any other skills for that matter are lost, they are lost for good. You can't just decide to bring em back!
Melbourne was built on the gold rush.
It will fade away on the coal, iron and uranium rush of the 21st century.
There is a union-capital axis at work in the southern states that is about to be smashed by Kev07 and Swannie which will lead to a better wealthier Australia.
gg
Victoria and South Australia are practising a form of mainstream CDP to keep their workers employed.
CDP, Garpal?
protectionsim stiffles innovation, just wondering why the rest of the world would want the cars we make here ....
didn't Rudd just go to Japan and offer Toyota a big hand out to invest into green cars here??
I am unsure of the relationship of the Aussie car makers with the parents - isn't Ford and General Motors (Holden) American companies?
Australia already has probably the lowest tariffs among it's trading partners. The average amongst USA, China, Korea, and Japan is 35%. The Bracks report wants 5% by 2010 which is very low in comparison and will make it very difficult for local manufacturers to remain competitive, especially if AUDUSD remains at elevated levels.
We don't see these countries lowering their tarrifs, infact their trend is the opposite.
I have worked for an Australian automotive components company here for 23 years. In that time as tarriffs have come down immensly and we have expanded the business into 10 other countries and our biggest customers being GM and FMC. Today we are one of the largest brake manufactures world wide. The main reason this happened was because our products are innovative, lightweight, and simply superier all round. These products were designed and used on Aussie vehicles for years before being promoted overseas.One must not assume that all Aussie vehicles are all trash.
The auto industry is this countries biggest exporter at present behind mining. The only problem is, mining only employs 2% of the workforce.
I'd love to support Aussie industry and totally agree with the argument about producing something tangible.Good on you, Kinezakis.
You are one of the few who actually produce something tangible for society (also, usually the lowest paid workers).
Kill off all manufacturing industry, and all that is left is people producing pieces of paper.
I'd love to support Aussie industry and totally agree with the argument about producing something tangible.
But looking at the last 2 work vehicles makes me face reality. Bottom line is another fault develops, on average, every 4 months. Mostly small things like the heater fan wearing out or the hand brake lever plastic coming off, but there have been outright mechanical failures too.
Meanwhile my 8 year old Nissan Pulsar has thus far required new tyres, one new battery and replacement of the front wiper blades. That's it. And it's a cheaper car that's travelled a lot further and on worse roads than those Falcons. Aussie manufacturers ought to be able to achieve similar levels of reliability...
Toyota produces locally made vehicles to the exacting Japanese standards and worldwide platfom. The Japanese would settle for nothing less. Just because these vehicles are made in Australia does not make them inferior to any other Toyotas worldwide as the Toyota quality standards.
The same goes for Holdens and Fords in comparison to US standards. In fact Holdens probably make a better product than GM in the USA.
With Ford and Hold it has been difficult quality wise. If you look back and see what they have been up against. That is to develop vehicles from the ground up for a low volume domestic market(around 100K units a year). Other worldwide manufacturers are spending R & D for much larger volumes.
This will probably change in the years ahead as both GM and FMC have adopted worldwide platform rationalization programs. So you will basically be buying the same vehicles both here and overseas but made in their respective countries. This would bring development costs down dramatically.
I don't doubt they make a good car, mate, but they are needed elsewhere where their sweat can earn more productive dollars mining.
With all the subsidies their cost per car is way over the equivalent cost in Thailand or South Korea.
gg.
the subsidies are mainly for research and development not for production, as they are for most other industries.
As for the mining, not everyone wants to move interstate and work in a filthy environment digging up dirt. Even if it pays a little more at the moment
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?