- Joined
- 2 July 2008
- Posts
- 7,102
- Reactions
- 6
In what?Obviously there's minimal long term investors?
well, compared to Nelson, bugs bunny would inspire confidence
At least Bugs Bunny is a very happy bunny and come to think of it, Rudds Bunny is also a happy looking bunny. Both have good teeth, one bites and one doesn't, out of sight that is.well, compared to Nelson, bugs bunny would inspire confidence
hello,
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24332566-661,00.html
another one of Rudd's about to fall over the edge, next will be the NARS
thankyou
robots
Above all others - and I can say this on Valentine's Day - I thank my wife, Deb Beale, an endlessly intelligent, supportive and loving woman. I knew this instantly from my first outing, when she agreed to visit a picket line with me.
Off topic 2020!! If you can't build up the left without taking down the right don't post.
Galaxy: Rudd 58, Turnbull 28
Sunday, September 21, 2008 – 1:10 am, by William Bowe
Findings of a Galaxy poll published in today’s News Limited papers from a small sample of 400 (nothing on voting intention):
• Kevin Rudd leads Malcolm Turnbull as preferred leader 58 to 28 per cent. The last federal Galaxy poll in March had Rudd leading Brendan Nelson 69 per cent to 15 per cent.
• Twenty-three per cent of respondents said they would be more likely to vote Liberal with Turnbull as leader than they would have been with Nelson, against 11 per cent less likely.
• Fifty-three per cent believe Turnbull would give the Liberals a better chance at the next election against 35 per cent for Peter Costello.
• Forty-eight per cent of respondents considered Turnbull “arrogant” against 23 per cent for Rudd.
• Fifty-one per cent considered Rudd a “strong leader” against 30 per cent for Turnbull, and 49 per cent thought Rudd “decisive” (surely much the same thing) against 30 per cent for Turnbull.
• Fifty-six per cent of respondents believed Rudd had a “a vision of the future” and 52 per cent thought him “in touch with voters”.
so who you blaming for 1 and 2 (and 2)?1. fuel watch - fail
2. Grocery watch - fail
2. Alcopop tax - fail
3. first home buyers account - fail
4. laptops for school kids - fail
5. 20/20 summit - fail/ still no outcome
6. apply downward pressure on inflation - fail
7. promise to ""end the blame game" - FAIL
and the list goes on.....
4. it is being rolled out. try a bit of patience.http://www.crikey.com.au/Election-2007/20071105-Rudds-first-home-owner-saver-account.html
Instead, like the Howard Government’s economically idiotic first home owner’s grant, Rudd’s solution is to attempt to give first-home owners more money so that they can afford a deposit. The obvious problem with Rudd’s plan is, like the first-home owner's grant, gifting people money (albeit in the form of reduced taxes on savings) has a direct inflationary effect. A first home owner’s grant of $12,000 doesn’t save the purchaser any money, rather, allows the vendor to receive more when they sell their property.
Michells Grattan
September 21, 2008
WHILE he is in New York for three days this week, Kevin Rudd expects to have formal meetings with about a dozen world leaders and informal ones with another 10 to 15. ...
Rudd is in New York primarily to lobby for Australia's bid for a seat on the United Nations Security Council.
But with the global financial crisis, he is packing into his program as much economic discussion as he can. .... as the international financial crisis has worsened, it has given Rudd some political cover. He's able to point out that he'll have meetings with the New York Federal Reserve, the Treasury and the World Bank. Being in New York gives him the opportunity for timely and face-to-face briefings.
The financial crisis potentially has big implications for Australia and the Government because it's very much one world, although the message of Rudd and the Reserve Bank governor Glenn Stevens is that our financial institutions are well placed to cope. It is a credible, if convenient, argument that it is no bad thing for Rudd to get a first-hand feel for the situation.
It makes it harder for the Opposition to mount a case against Rudd, especially as Malcolm Turnbull pointed to the implications for Australia of the financial crisis as a reason for a recent trip to the US as shadow treasurer.
.ANZ chief economist Saul Eslake backs up the usefulness of the PM's visit. "Trips Rudd and Treasurer Wayne Swan made to the US this year gave them a sense — which not too many in Australia had — of the global downside risks then. That meant the May budget wasn't as tough on spending as originally planned.
They didn't want the budget to be seen to be contributing to an Australian downturn," Eslake said. "It will be useful if Rudd can assess whether what the US Treasury has been announcing — especially the plan for a public institution to absorb bad debts — is a turning point for the better. If the trip also gives Rudd the chance to spread the message about the stability and strong capital base of the Australian financial system, that would be a good thing too."
The financial crisis will be one of Rudd's themes when he addresses the UN General Assembly.
Another will be climate change. On Friday, Rudd proposed an Australian Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute, in which other countries would be invited to participate. This initiative, to which the Government will contribute up to $100 million a year, is designed to strengthen the international credentials of Australia — a mega-coal producer — on climate change in the run-up to the Copenhagen climate conference late next year. An activist climate change stance is also useful for the Security Council lobbying.
John Connor, CEO of the Climate Institute, was among the industry executives, scientists and representatives of non-government organisations Rudd met on Friday before announcing his carbon institute. Connor was encouraged by Rudd flagging that he saw strong international targets "as necessary"; Connor hopes that in speeches and private talks Rudd will press other leaders to focus on ambitious targets and to make moving to low-carbon economies one of the levers in the push to international economic recovery.
The purpose of the UN meeting is to review progress towards the millennium goals for 2015 - including tackling poverty and disease and promoting education - that were set in 2000 at a UN gathering John Howard attended. Progress is lagging; this meeting will involve a call for countries to make good on money.
Australia is on track financially, having promised low in the first place. Last week, Rudd was asked about a call from the Make Poverty History co-chairmen, Tim Costello and Andrew Hewett, to increase Australia's aid commitment to 0.7 per cent of gross national income. Rudd replied that the Government's position "is to aim to, by 2015, reach 0.5 per cent and we have made no commitment beyond that. Secondly, we have many other huge competing priorities … on the Australian budget".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?