- Joined
- 19 October 2005
- Posts
- 4,174
- Reactions
- 6,150
Hi @barney, the US$55m was the settlement with Kingsgate's insurer, Zurich Australia Insurance over a disputed political risk policy that the insurer dragged through the courts trying to bankrupt Kingsgate into submission.
To quote, March 2019:
"The HOA with Zurich provides for a settlement to Kingsgate worth more than AUD $82 million comprising:
A cash payment of US$55 million to be made to Kingsgate by mid-April 2019;
A requirement for the Insurers to contribute up to US$3.5 million of future costs towards the TAFTA Arbitration. The Insurers funding contribution will be paid on a pro-rata basis with Kingsgate; and
A sharing arrangement between Kingsgate and the Insurers for future distributions of TAFTA Claim proceeds.
Executive Chairman of Kingsgate, Mr Ross Smyth-Kirk, today said “I realise that it has been a long recovery process for our loyal shareholders, but this settlement transaction provides material upside for our Company, namely:
Sufficient funds to pay out in full the Corporate Debt Facility;
Liquidity to give the Company time to maximise the value of the Nueva Esperanza project through further development or sale, and remain aspirational for other development opportunities;
Kingsgate no longer requires litigation funding to pursue its PRI Claim nor its TAFTA Claim; and most importantly,
The Insurers’ pro-rata funding commitment under the HOA means that Kingsgate and the Insurers will be working together to fully prosecute the TAFTA Claim.”
“I would also like to thank our dedicated legal team at Clifford Chance .."
The arbitration hearing under TAFTA was a separate proceeding that followed the insurance decision and that proceeding concluded many months ago but we await the tribunal's considered judgement. Meanwhile there has been wrangling behind the scenes for a settlement between the two parties before a judgement is handed down. Kingsgate has been ordered by the court not to tell its shareholders what's going on while judgement is in abeyance.
If we win at judgement, or a preemptive settlement is reached, yes it's certain that the figure will be substantially higher than US$55m. To take the most informed and sobre prediction, densamer, whom I mentioned, said this on twitter yesterday,
"Look the way I read this news is the company already has an EV of more than -$250m, yes a negative EV."
Unless I have a cognitive issue, I think that implies a cash amount of more than $430m after the dust settles, being that the current market cap is about $180m. There are about 220m shares in KCN issued so that would be almost $2 cash per share, plus certainly, assuming this victory, a gold mine that is relicensed to operate and which already has newly awarded prospecting tenements.
Kingsgate settles PRI Claim for more than A$82 million – www.kingsgate.com.au
www.kingsgate.com.au
To quote, March 2019:
"The HOA with Zurich provides for a settlement to Kingsgate worth more than AUD $82 million comprising:
A cash payment of US$55 million to be made to Kingsgate by mid-April 2019;
A requirement for the Insurers to contribute up to US$3.5 million of future costs towards the TAFTA Arbitration. The Insurers funding contribution will be paid on a pro-rata basis with Kingsgate; and
A sharing arrangement between Kingsgate and the Insurers for future distributions of TAFTA Claim proceeds.
Executive Chairman of Kingsgate, Mr Ross Smyth-Kirk, today said “I realise that it has been a long recovery process for our loyal shareholders, but this settlement transaction provides material upside for our Company, namely:
Sufficient funds to pay out in full the Corporate Debt Facility;
Liquidity to give the Company time to maximise the value of the Nueva Esperanza project through further development or sale, and remain aspirational for other development opportunities;
Kingsgate no longer requires litigation funding to pursue its PRI Claim nor its TAFTA Claim; and most importantly,
The Insurers’ pro-rata funding commitment under the HOA means that Kingsgate and the Insurers will be working together to fully prosecute the TAFTA Claim.”
“I would also like to thank our dedicated legal team at Clifford Chance .."
The arbitration hearing under TAFTA was a separate proceeding that followed the insurance decision and that proceeding concluded many months ago but we await the tribunal's considered judgement. Meanwhile there has been wrangling behind the scenes for a settlement between the two parties before a judgement is handed down. Kingsgate has been ordered by the court not to tell its shareholders what's going on while judgement is in abeyance.
If we win at judgement, or a preemptive settlement is reached, yes it's certain that the figure will be substantially higher than US$55m. To take the most informed and sobre prediction, densamer, whom I mentioned, said this on twitter yesterday,
"Look the way I read this news is the company already has an EV of more than -$250m, yes a negative EV."
Unless I have a cognitive issue, I think that implies a cash amount of more than $430m after the dust settles, being that the current market cap is about $180m. There are about 220m shares in KCN issued so that would be almost $2 cash per share, plus certainly, assuming this victory, a gold mine that is relicensed to operate and which already has newly awarded prospecting tenements.