Apparently her paramour is a wealthy property developer. That will appeal to the Kath and Kim crowd.
Yes. Surely if you're going to be offering your take on someone else's old comment it would be reasonable to state that, IFocus.You presented it though as your own opinion.
As if you ever would anyway, Rumpole.I definitely won't be voting for her in that case.
Glad you bought these facts to my attention.
Ms Bishop is single. She has been linked with various companions since being divorced. How is it relevant and whose business is it other than her own?
And why on earth would you, even if she were in a live in, confirmed relationship with someone who happened to be a property developer, allow that to affect any consideration of her capacity to do her job?
We happen to have some property developers on this forum, people with the initiative to see and take up opportunities. Good on them.
Yes of course as long as their developments are justified on public interest grounds. If it's just a cash grab as a thank you from their political mates for donations or relationships, then it amounts to corruption.
Yet corruption from unions and a PM is perfectly fine. Happy to turn a blind eye to that.
There's a constant theme amongst members here; if something is smelly in Denmark, it's Ok because there's a smell in London too. Just replace Denmark and London with the political party, sexual orientation, religion of your choice. .
And what is it with the apparent lack of understanding satire and irony when posts are so blatantly ridiculous they have to be tongue in cheek.... emoticons are superfluous. Our refugee Vietnamese member in particular has a field day with some of you guys.
Sadly, Bintang, I have no insider knowledge whatsoever. I was just curious enough last night, following the assertion about her 'partner' to google "Julie Bishop's partner", the result of that search I duly posted.You seem to have your 'ear to the ground' Julia. If Ms Bishop ever decides to ditch her current paramour please let me know. I'd like to try my chances.
There's a constant theme amongst members here; if something is smelly in Denmark, it's Ok because there's a smell in London too.
It's a pity we couldn't advertise the job and even recruit from overseas.
That would be extremely dangerous if it was done in accordance with the principal of equal opportunity employment. We might end up with Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Imagine the out-cry if we tried to avoid this by saying – ‘no muslims need apply’.
You are pretty monomaniacal about the muslims. Do you dream about them?
No. I suspect I'm just an Islamophobe outing myself.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.