- Joined
- 15 January 2008
- Posts
- 691
- Reactions
- 1
I have no idea as to why they waited so long, possibly rig availability. Would be hard to get someone to mobilise to a remote location do a 1000m RC job.
The hole depths don't really add up either, they say 33 holes for 990m which is an average of 30m/hole. The are not showing those sort of depths in their tables, unless they are only showing the mineralised parts of their holes. They have most likely drilled shallow holes as a first pass to asses the higher grade parts of the sequence with a view to focus later deep drilling on the more prospective parts. This way they can assess which of the bands within the steep dipping sequence are more iron rich. I would be more worried about a company that leapt in and drilled 10,000m of 150m deep RC holes on a few rock chips.
Another reason may be that the rig they managed to get was a piece of crap that could not successfully drill the banded iron.
The hole depths don't really add up either, they say 33 holes for 990m which is an average of 30m/hole. The are not showing those sort of depths in their tables, unless they are only showing the mineralised parts of their holes. They have most likely drilled shallow holes as a first pass to asses the higher grade parts of the sequence with a view to focus later deep drilling on the more prospective parts. This way they can assess which of the bands within the steep dipping sequence are more iron rich. I would be more worried about a company that leapt in and drilled 10,000m of 150m deep RC holes on a few rock chips.
Another reason may be that the rig they managed to get was a piece of crap that could not successfully drill the banded iron.