Hi guys,
I'm a long time reader first time poster.
It seems as though there's been ome confusion regarding the location of the brockman tenement in relation to FDL/FMG tenements. I've attached a picture of the area. The top section is the FDL tenement where much of their iron ore target is located. The bottom section is the JMS brockman tenement. It is pretty much 45km dead south of the FDL tenement.
I think that the probability of success at brockman has more to do with the RIO resource next door rather than whats being found in the Pilbara regon. I'm no geologist however. Could this be why JMS is not being valued any higher by the market at this time when iron ore is red hot. What are peoples thoughts on this? I've also read somewhere on an analysts report that the max potential for brockman is only 100mt. Another reason why the price is not moving as much as us forum members hoped?
Cheers
I'm a long time reader first time poster.
It seems as though there's been ome confusion regarding the location of the brockman tenement in relation to FDL/FMG tenements. I've attached a picture of the area. The top section is the FDL tenement where much of their iron ore target is located. The bottom section is the JMS brockman tenement. It is pretty much 45km dead south of the FDL tenement.
I think that the probability of success at brockman has more to do with the RIO resource next door rather than whats being found in the Pilbara regon. I'm no geologist however. Could this be why JMS is not being valued any higher by the market at this time when iron ore is red hot. What are peoples thoughts on this? I've also read somewhere on an analysts report that the max potential for brockman is only 100mt. Another reason why the price is not moving as much as us forum members hoped?
Cheers