- Joined
- 18 February 2006
- Posts
- 4,200
- Reactions
- 2
Cryptic ann!
"Jupiter Mines Limited (“Jupiter”) wishes to advise that the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between Sinosteel Australia Pty Ltd (“Sinosteel”) and Jupiter dated April 28th 2006 will not proceed to the next phase of a joint venture agreement, following expiry of Sinosteel’s 30 day exclusive negotiating right under the MOU on 1 July 2006."
Does that mean that Sino Steel said we're not interested?
Or does that mean an agreement couldn't be reached in time and Sino is losing exclusive rights?
"Jupiter is pleased to advise it has now commenced negotiations with another
party to develop a joint venture agreement for the Mt Mason, Mt Ida and Mt Hope iron ore regional projects in Western Australia. The terms and conditions of the new Joint Venture are likely to produce a significantly better outcome for Jupiter compared with those contemplated within the Sinosteel discussions and MOU."
I would really like to know if Sino said no = Negative because the project isn't as good as it appears
or JMS said times up to Sino = Good indicates that project is even better than it appears and thats why they've already got another possible offer on the table, the question is from who?
"Jupiter Mines Limited (“Jupiter”) wishes to advise that the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between Sinosteel Australia Pty Ltd (“Sinosteel”) and Jupiter dated April 28th 2006 will not proceed to the next phase of a joint venture agreement, following expiry of Sinosteel’s 30 day exclusive negotiating right under the MOU on 1 July 2006."
Does that mean that Sino Steel said we're not interested?
Or does that mean an agreement couldn't be reached in time and Sino is losing exclusive rights?
"Jupiter is pleased to advise it has now commenced negotiations with another
party to develop a joint venture agreement for the Mt Mason, Mt Ida and Mt Hope iron ore regional projects in Western Australia. The terms and conditions of the new Joint Venture are likely to produce a significantly better outcome for Jupiter compared with those contemplated within the Sinosteel discussions and MOU."
I would really like to know if Sino said no = Negative because the project isn't as good as it appears
or JMS said times up to Sino = Good indicates that project is even better than it appears and thats why they've already got another possible offer on the table, the question is from who?