Hi retro..incisive post from you.
The passage I highlighted is too broad for me to understand.The word universe is being used when I think that human being is what is meant.My reasoning .. the universe is perfect , it is human mind that is not perfect.
Other than that I think the post is a good case for god and christianity as an explanation of things.Definately convincing.
1. I would agree with Chief Seattle, - I lov that concept of , "when you walk on the earth, remember that you are walking on the ashes of your ancestors"... my continuance after death will take a number of forms.
1. will be in the form of my body being recycled back into Nature (ie God) and recycled forever more, through the cosmos, stars etc. (of course I'm talking extreme geological time here).
2. through my genes (presuming I have kids);
3. and also through my ideas, communications and actions which propagate from person to person, both directly and indirectly (ie via the internet! etc).
(words and song by Judith Durham), from a television script by Ted Perry based on a short speech by Chief Seattle, 1854. http://www.judithdurham.com/
not that good a song - but sure are interesting lyrics.
you can listen to a few bars of this song on that website (click on "enter". then "lyrics" etc) - but it's not one of her best in the music dept - mainly the words. (imho)
Here’s that Chief Seattle song – but it has been reworked a bit, rhyme, metre, all those constraints that the red indian didn’t worry aboutbilly joel, goodnight my angel,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nprteZX80tk&mode=related&search= YESSS!!! found it - Billy Joel sings 'The Lullaby'
I once heard him interviewed over this (THIS YOUTUBE - NB it continues past the break at the 5 minute mark ) - the child (then only 7 or so) was concerned that the parents had just divorced - so he had to reassure her.
"i promised I would never leave you"
She also wanted to know about death. He then put to the child that he would not die whilstever she remembered this song for instance , hence
"Someday your child may cry, And if you sing this lullabye
Then in your heart, There will always be a part of me
Someday we'll all be gone, But lullabyes go on and on...
They never die, That's how you
And I Will be"
Personally I love the concept.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LraZEoRnkPc&mode=related&search= the full song
GOODNIGHT MY ANGEL Billy Joel
Goodnight, my angel, Time to close your eyes
And save these questions for another day
I think I know what you've been asking me
I think you know what I've been trying to say
I promised I would never leave you
And you should always know
Wherever you may go, No matter where you are
I never will be far away
Goodnight, my angel, Now it's time to sleep
And still so many things I want to say
Remember all the songs you sang for me
When we went sailing on an emerald bay
And like a boat out on the ocean
I'm rocking you to sleep
The water's dark and deep, Inside this ancient heart
You'll always be a part of me
Lu-lu-lu-lu-lu-lu
lu-lu-lu-lu-lu-lu-lu-lu-lu
Goodnight, my angel
Now it's time to dream
And dream how wonderful your life will be
Someday your child may cry
And if you sing this lullabye
Then in your heart
There will always be a part of me
Someday we'll all be gone
But lullabyes go on and on...
They never die, That's how you, And I Will be
We must teach our children, That man didn't weave life's web
For he's just one strand in it, So don't destroy the thread
We must teach our children, That the ground beneath their feet
Is the ashes of our fathers, Not something to defeat
We must teach our children, That the Earth is rich with lives
So they'll all respect their homeland, And that our Mother Earth survives
We must teach our children, That what befalls the Earth
Befalls the sons of everyone, In this land of their birth
In this land of their birth
We must teach our children, If they do harm to the land
They bring harm upon themselves, For the soil will turn to sand
We must teach our children, Earth does not belong to man
For man belongs to Earth, And that's the way this world was planned
We must teach our children, That all things do connect
And that we're one big family, All things we must protect
All things we must protect
I cant see how evolution can be argued against.
Its happening all the time.
A few questions I've never understood about God.(I don't believe in God)
1. Why didn't God just make a Heaven and be done with it? Instead of this elaborate "test" of faith etc - are we just an experiment? Seeing as God knows everything, God surely should have known the outcome.
2. In the scheme of the universe we are the equivalent of nothing more then the smallest bacteria on the nail of our little toe, yet we seem to be the centre of the universe as far as religion is concerned. Did God create this whole universe just for us? I find this hard to believe.
3. Why does this supreme being want us to worship him? Maybe God has an ego?
I was forced to grow up in a strict church environment and as such saw too many inconsistences in religion to believe in a God.
IMO the only reason there is a God is because mankind invented God to explain our own mortality and the many unexplainable things in our world. People need God to believe in because they need/want there to be more to life than just our current physical existance, that there must be more than just this. As long as people continue to believe in a God there will be a God.
We seem to be the only living organism on this planet who needs to have a God, yet all the others seem to exist okay without one.
There is no good or evil in Nature - We just perceive things as good or evil depending upon how they impinge on our own existence.
Dukey, that is a good point. Some bugger once said that "we can only see things through the eyes God has given us", alluding to our own limitations when in comes to the potential for divine realisation. Is it possibly our simple failure to grasp a reality beyond our own physical existence, that gives such weight to our assertions of nature and laws and and the linear traversal of time (biological advancement of man). That is, we fail to grasp how time works - at what point did the second hand start ticking at the beginning of the universe, and from whose perception did time start moving? And if we move linearly, where is the endpoint of time? Does the end of Earth mean all the universe stops moving because there is no perception of time as we define it?
We have to develop constructs that make sense to our rational mind and make sense of the infintissemally small part we play. That is, we may actually make rational constructs due to our limitations to understand as well as spiritual constructs due to our same failures.
Potentially, one could pose the question that if there is no God, why is there an incessant advancement of the human race. We all understand the biological benefits of advancing but is there a more philisophical drivinf force at play: What are we striving for? Why was there a need to grow from being a person in 900BC. Why did we just not stop here - the food was good, sex was great (so I've heard) and the climate might have been good). Is it simply an innate force to better our world, is there a yearning for something that we're not yet seeing?
I was thinking exactly that earlier today, Mint Man. Thank goodness he appears to have given up.ditto that!
If bullmarket was still aroundthis thread would have turned to **** on the very first page
Good thread tech
Barney - you old devil, lol - playing scrabble with the missus, when the rest of us are sorting out the universe here lol.
OTS - when you say "May the Force be with you" is that the Police Force? or something else lol. The only force I've got going for me is... gravity?PS here's that song I mentioned back there - I like it anyway
Mark Schultz song "Walking Her Home"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVZiWTmKNc0&mode=related&search=
apologies in advance (this is several times more corny that Kansas in August) :-That is bizarre 2020.I just spent an hour looking at the Sir Isaac Newton: The
Universal Law of Gravitation and tuned back in here at about 10.08 to see you had mentioned gravity .I have never been to the site before and that would have to be coincidental to be mentioned while I was there..
Personally I would arguehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._S._Lewis Trilemma
In the book Mere Christianity, Lewis famously criticized the idea that Jesus was merely a human being, albeit a great moral teacher:
"I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God. That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell. [[there's that word again]] You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse. You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronising nonsense about his being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to." (Lewis 1952, pp. 43)
According to the argument, most people are willing to accept Jesus Christ as a great moral teacher, but the Gospels record that Jesus made many claims to divinity, either explicitly — ("I and the father are one." John 10:30; when asked by the High priest whether he was the Son of God, Jesus replied "It is as you said" Matthew 26:64) — or implicitly, by assuming authority only God could have ("the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins" Matthew 9:6). Lewis said there are three options:
1. Jesus was telling falsehoods and knew it, and so he was a liar.
2. Jesus was telling falsehoods but believed he was telling the truth, and so he was insane.
3. Jesus was telling the truth, and so he was divine.
[[ fourth option :- 4. Jesus was being verballed - by people writing this 20 or 30 years later]]
Lewis’s argument was later expanded by the Christian apologist Josh McDowell (in his book More Than a Carpenter). (McDowell 2001) The term "trilemma" (which Lewis did not use) is often used to refer to this argument. Although widely repeated in Christian apologetic literature, it has been largely ignored by professional theologians and biblical scholars.[1]
Lewis's trilemma appeared at a time when secular scholars, such as David Friedrich Strauss, had portrayed Jesus' miracles and resurrection as myths. The concept that Jesus was not God but a wise man had gained ground in academic circles. The trilemma opposes the idea that Jesus was not divine, without relying on miracles for proof. In accepting the premise that Jesus had claimed divinity, he contradicted a viewpoint, popularized by H. G. Wells in his Outline of History, that Jesus had made no such claim.
Further to previous
a) it's a shame that JC was resurrected and "beamed up" to Heaven, body and soul - if he was buried somewhere, we could do a thorough DNA on him, and get a few more clues about big daddy.
b) If God is a Sphere (as Xenaphane proposes) , then why doesn't Jesus have at least a bit of a spherical look about him - maybe a beer gut or something ?
ok ok , i realise i'll go to hell for this post - but the moving keyboard writes, and having writ moves on....
Trials
There were extensive efforts to root out the supposed influence of Satan by various measures aimed at the people who were accused of being servants of Satan. People suspected of being "possessed" by Satan were put on trial. These trials were biased against the accused. Brutal techniques were routinely used to extract the required admission of guilt. They included hot pincers, the thumbscrew, and the 'swimming' of suspects (an old superstition whereby innocence was established by immersing the accused in water for a sufficiently long period of time).
yet another question, closely related. Was Jesus closely related to God?
... eg "5. Jesus found out he could turn water into wine, and had just installed a new 2000 litre water tank" etc
I liked Unc Festive's one about the dyslexic santa worshippersSATAN BE GONE. I'm not sure where this leaves Satanists?? Perhaps they could put on a show for us at you local thatre-restaurant.
So what does that make the bacteria... and the backteria on his toe?2. In the scheme of the universe we are the equivalent of nothing more then the smallest bacteria on the nail of our little toe,
Ive heared that sooo many times before, good on you for having your own brain and/or saying what you really think. I have seen familys that just wont allow other family members believe in anything other then 'their god', beliefs or religion.I was forced to grow up in a strict church environment and as such saw too many inconsistences in religion to believe in a God..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?