Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
No, nothing at all to do with accent. It's the tone of voice I'm referring to. Timbre: here's an explanation:I
I don't think he sounds prissy. Maybe it's the Melbourne accent?
If that all sounds rather too esoteric, consider the difference between, just as one example, listening to Bill Shorten or listening to Malcolm Turnbull. The first voice is light, without distinction, and lacks stress on various words to enhance meaning.Sounds may be generally characterized by pitch, loudness, and quality. Sound "quality" or "timbre" describes those characteristics of sound which allow the ear to distinguish sounds which have the same pitch and loudness. Timbre is then a general term for the distinguishable characteristics of a tone. Timbre is mainly determined by the harmonic content of a sound and the dynamic characteristics of the sound such as vibrato and the attack-decay envelope of the sound.
Mr Turnbull, on the other hand, has a mellifluous, well modulated, quite deep voice, and understands how to deliver meaning in his vocal message.
It might sound irrelevant, but we form much of our impression of people by their appearance and their presentation, very much including their voices.
Others might view him quite differently, of course, but to me my overall impression of Mr Shorten is one of slightness, smallness, insignificance, born out by his voice. That might be to entirely misjudge his hitherto hidden magnificence.