This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Is Global Warming becoming unstoppable?

Jump to new
Arctic orbital spacecraft and ice volume calculations are soft Lib agenda? Horse medicine is for real men?
 
wayneL said:
Wanna sit down with me and go through some of the dross? I feckin dare you Robbee..
Click to expand...
You have had dozens of opportunities here to present evidence supporting your claims.
You are a consistent failure.
Deal with the science please.
 
rederob said:
You have had dozens of opportunities here to present evidence supporting your claims.
You are a consistent failure.
Deal with the science please.
Click to expand...
And if you'd read back through the thread I have linked to various papers and scientists several times, but your grade A confirmation bias is so intellectually blocking for you that it is now basically a waste of time.

You will never concede even the most robust of points.
 
wayneL said:
And if you'd read back through the thread I have linked to various papers and scientists several times, but your grade A confirmation bias is so intellectually blocking for you that it is now basically a waste of time.
Click to expand...
Why not read some of the comments made regarding your linked papers.
You consistently misuse "ad hominem" and do not seem to understand what "appeal to authority" means, given you are especially good at it.
And when you are not stuffing up language, you swing into terminologies like "confirmation bias", and "left wing" to apparently disparage the posters you respond to. As soon as posters - like you - do this, they have pretty well lost all credibility because they have deflected whatever they thought was their point.
I have yet to see your comments reflect the competence necessary to present any meaningful argument, and this is again event in the tenor of this last reply of yours.
 
@rederob I tender your interchanges with other good faith actors here, as evidence of your bad faith.

You are not interested in debate.
 
wayneL said:
@rederob I tender your interchanges with other good faith actors here, as evidence of your bad faith.
You are not interested in debate.
Click to expand...
I have been keenly interested in climate science for decades, and am happy to discuss or debate it with anyone.
How about you resurrect your last link to a science paper and we have a good look at it?
 
This just serendipitously popped up on my suggested videos on YouTube. I have no idea what the channel is about and I'm not really I follow will have any climate change channels on YouTube. But thought it was interesting

 
Have a look at some of the other soft sciences... pychology, gender theory, woman's studies anyone?
 
wayneL said:
Thread...

Click to expand...


In fact the headlines showed that countries in far north latitudes Canada, Siberia, Greenland, Sweden etc are warming at twice the rate of the rest of the world.
If one looks at the NASA website it is clear that global warming is stronger at the poles. There is plenty of evidence that the warming is having far reaching changes in these areas as well as high latitudes - Tibet for example.

https://theconversation.com/arctic-...the-far-north-means-for-the-rest-of-us-123309
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12335-tibet-is-warming-at-twice-global-average/
 
Tibet's anomalous warmth is
1) volcanoes
2) tsunami
and 3) great Tibetan cycle of Shogyen Galen Dharamsala the Radiance.
 
This is the sort of psychopathology you clowns are creating...

 
Well, Natalia Mateo is under massive pressure and pc stress , don't blame her , have some compassion.
 
wayneL said:
This is the sort of psychopathology you clowns are creating...

Click to expand...

Not true Wayne.
Yes a women got up at AOC and did a good job of looking like a nutcase spruiking the problems of "Global Warming" and suggesting the Jonathan Swift solution

However she was not a climate activist but a troll who went specifically to the forum on behalf of the Lyndon LaRouche PAC to get this sort of publicity and smear climate warming concerns.

It will be interesting to say if any of the thousands of people who retweeted that hoax ever acknowledge it was a lie - or even accept it is.

Did an AOC Supporter Suggest ‘Eating Babies’ to Fight Climate Change?

The bizarre statement came up at a New York City town hall event in October 2019.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/babies-climate-change-aoc/
 
Haha great troll then... Just a matter of time though.
 
Can't lose can you ? If the outrageous incident is true "My God what a pack of dangerous crazies"

If it's a troll smearing people concerned about climate change " Ah well it's only a matter of time"

Interesting of course that there is no suggestion that the people setting up, creating and spreading this smear have anything to answer for.
 
Scomo the clown stood up like a nutcase and raved "This is coal - don't be afraid!" and claimed he could eat it without any emissions which alarmed mothers with babies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Electricity investments
Replies
8
Views
630
Smurf1976
February 2025
2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
6K
ducati916
Fake News - Global Warming Consensus
40 41 42
Replies
831
Views
46K
SirRumpole
What does Lloyds think is happening?
2
Replies
22
Views
6K
springhill
M
Rothschild Australia, leaders in carbon trading market
Replies
2
Views
5K
So_Cynical
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...