wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 26,015
- Reactions
- 13,351
Ad hom is a logical fallacy bruh.
Again, I urge you to look in the mirror.
Regards evidence, please note Mann v Ball.
Ad hom is a logical fallacy bruh.Learn what evidence is, and get yourself a decent dictionary, because what you post is mostly poorly founded, diversionary, off-topic rubbish.
Your driving pattern may be chaotic . Your road-distance to where you are driving is not. You deny the 2nd bit.Well my point here is that the physics is not simple. It is extraordinarily complex and chaotic.
That is not a valid analogy in any way whatsoever.Your driving pattern may be chaotic . Your road-distance to where you are driving is not. You deny the 2nd bit.
As for the CO2 thing, measurement, properties and relationships concerning gases is a known even if some argue other wise it is a known.
The rapid increase of CO2 in our atmosphere is also a known, currently rising at over (I believe) 2% a year (at an accelerating rate?).
Basic physics when applied to gases (denied by some one here ) states something will change.
At the current rate of CO2 increase the very least you would consider (logic anyone or if you were truely a conservative wanting the good old days) is doing some thing about burning fossil fuels at a ever increasing rate (which is totally achievable).
So why are so many against the above, obvious, in your face, straight forward, not hard and certainly not complex?
Ideological dogma is my take on it.
I bet you can work out when you are being ripped off af the checkout. Most of the kids today can't.In my day we waz better at skool all the boyz spent there time smoking, drinking and trying to bonk the girls that's when they weren't razing the teaches........and look at how good we ended up
Please explain. Vibration of CO2 by radiation is a fixed function . The resultant heat variations cause chaotic complex weather .any way whatsoever.
Trump noted America had renovated the arsenal and acquired new nuclear capability, and the rest of the military was “all brand new”. “We all hope, and Scott hopes, we all pray that we never have to use nuclear,” Trump intoned. This will warm the globe and give kids another issue to discuss.Some random people .
Very simple with co2 level more than 15 times higher in the ancient past with an eden earth, twice the current level when earth had a similar weather as we have, how can the current increase alone explain the changes.that is very simple.of course, greenhouse effect of gas exists, but real scientists make and analyse experiments.we do not have spare pkanets to scale and test with, but we have had this planet data for longuer than 40000 years, we also have had a small mini ice age in recent history, the seine frozen in Paris during Napoleon wars etcPlease explain. Vibration of CO2 by radiation is a fixed function . The resultant heat variations cause chaotic complex weather .
Distance is fixed. Some random people have chaotic driving.
The radiative forcing is also logarithmic however, as you should know. What we don't know is the effect or lack thereof of all other forcings in a chaotic interplay with each other.Please explain. Vibration of CO2 by radiation is a fixed function . The resultant heat variations cause chaotic complex weather .
Distance is fixed. Some random people have chaotic driving.
These are the continued obfuscations of climate science deniers.The radiative forcing is also logarithmic however, as you should know. What we don't know is the effect or lack thereof of all other forcings in a chaotic interplay with each other.
There is no deterministically calculated average earth temp per ppm of co2, never has been, never can be.
Utter pseudoscience, and symptomatic of the rubbish that gets swallowed by denialists as some type of gospel.Very simple with co2 level more than 15 times higher in the ancient past with an eden earth, twice the current level when earth had a similar weather as we have, how can the current increase alone explain the changes.that is very simple.of course, greenhouse effect of gas exists, but real scientists make and analyse experiments.we do not have spare pkanets to scale and test with, but we have had this planet data for longuer than 40000 years, we also have had a small mini ice age in recent history, the seine frozen in Paris during Napoleon wars etc
Denial of experimental data to achieve a belief is not science, and if in 50y, we discover that co2 or methane are playing a very small role but something else is the main player,how do you think your kids will judge you.the science is NOT settle on global warming, but it will not be as it is now impossible to even suggest any other cause that the god co2
And we'd better pray that co2 is not involved as the main reason , as anyone understanding the world knows that this will carry on going up even if the west stopped existing
I'm going to refrain from duplicating your puerile penchant for ad hom, but your argumentative logic here is way dodgy mate.These are the continued obfuscations of climate science deniers.
Sow the seeds of doubt and propose that because some things cannot be precisely known, we cannot work out the consequences.
What we do not know is how the climate will change in the lower troposphere such that it will affect forcing: specifically, the albedo of clouds.
So poorly informed is wayneL, after so many years of posting his rubbish, that he writes in one sentence that forcing is logarithmic while in the next he suggests we need to know how to calculate the "average earth temp per ppm of co2."
WayneL's conceptual skills are such that he keeps confusing deterministic science with probabilistic science, as was reinforced with his earlier discounting of @bi-polar 's correct analogy.
What you do not see is wayneL presenting his evidence. He keeps throwing mud and hopes some will stick.
I think we should consider properly the effect of heat released by human activitiesWell offer your alternate theory.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?