- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,691
- Reactions
- 7,540
Bas, it was included under the point about increasing surface reflectivity, but I did not propose "beads".Rederob the examples you gave of attempting to geo engineer the climate and the problems and costs associated are fair comment, However did you read the particular technology I quoted ? Looks promising, clever and cost effective.
And if it can reverse the current record melting of Arctic sea ice ... that would be invaluable
Britain commits to zero net emissions by 2050.
Will it ruin their economy ?
https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/06/11/uk-enshrine-2050-net-zero-emissions-target-law/
Quite right Sdajii. In 30 years the economy will be ruined by rising sea levels that flood London not to mention hundreds of klms of other other seaside areas. So they can deal with a few million internal climate refugees as well as the millions pouring in from Africa and Spain.They have 30 years to come up with a way to weasel out of today's lip service/virtue signal. It won't be this that ruins their economy.
Like most of what you write, it's just made up from whatever first came into your head.They have 30 years to come up with a way to weasel out of today's lip service/virtue signal. It won't be this that ruins their economy.
Britain commits to zero net emissions by 2050.
Will it ruin their economy ?
Depends totally on what else they also do (or don't do).
Britain has been on the renewables path for a very long time and is ahead of most nations around the world. So if there has been a cost, then it's been very well absorbed to date as the UK certainly has not been and industrial backwater fraught with economic woes.Exactly. I wonder if anyone has asked them the cost of this policy liked they asked our Labor Party.
The truth is no one knows the answer to that question because there are so many variables involved.
80 fariegnheight in the arctic a few days back
Britain commits to zero net emissions by 2050.
Will it ruin their economy ?
https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/06/11/uk-enshrine-2050-net-zero-emissions-target-law/
Well the cost of Hinkley Point C nuclear power station, I think I read is $26billion and that is for a station capable of supplying 7% of the system load. So it isn't cheap.Exactly. I wonder if anyone has asked them the cost of this policy liked they asked our Labor Party.
The truth is no one knows the answer to that question because there are so many variables involved.
We are facing the effects of CC across the country.
And summer is a long way off.
Country towns close to reaching 'day zero', as water supplies dry up in the drought
By National Regional Affairs reporter Lucy Barbour
Updated about an hour ago
Photo: Farmers have never known Walcha, in regional NSW, to be so dry. (ABC News: Lucy Barbour)
Across New South Wales and Queensland's southern downs, country towns are approaching their own 'day zero', as water supplies dry up in the drought.
Key points:
- Water security is still almost non-existent for many rural communities, with 10 towns at risk of running dry in six months
- Locals in Tenterfield are not washing cars or watering gardens and are cutting back on showers
- Even in high rainfall areas like Walcha, locals are enduring constant water restrictions
Ten towns, including major centres, are considered to be at high risk of running out within six months, if it doesn't rain and if water infrastructure isn't improved.
Councils are rushing to put emergency measures in place, but more than a decade since the end of the millennium drought, water security is still almost non-existent for many rural communities.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-14/day-zero-approaching-as-towns-run-out-of-water/11271430
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?