Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
The 5% has been re-applied to my account.
An interesting industry talk I attended this morning had a great speaker on the AUD and interest rates, and his expectations for the next few years. GDP without the past few years mining related investment which has all but dried up completely has been between 0% and 1.5% growth. We apparently are headed for having a large growth pothole to fill, and thanks to a relentlessly high AUD other industries and sectors are simply not in the position to pick up and fill it.
Another 125 basis points off to 2% in the next 12 months, and mortgages needing to be around 5% to spark some shift in deleveraging trends were his comments, however he also stated that Australia's deleveraging is an attitude that is likely here to stay for a good while.
Regardless, our interest rates can only go down from here surely. I personally don't think we'll see any issues until we need to chop it below 2% - there will definitely be some hesitation there.
they cant AUS ZIRP is around 2%
EDIT: well they can but the aud would crash and our ability to fund ourselves would be heavily diminished
Thinking of people that I know, I can't see any of them responding to an interest rate cut by increasing their spending. They either don't have debts anyway or would maintain the same rate of payments in the event that rates went down. People are cautious now, and nobody is going to throw money around for the sake of it.With deleveraging well embedded it's going to take big moves to kick up spending - the last 125 basis points haven't had the effect desired, just shrunk a bunch of mortgages that are propping up our biggest financial organisations.
In contrast, most seem relatively uninterested in interest rates these days simply because they are no longer top of the list of economic concerns for many. Few expect them to go up to any significant extent whereas loss of employment or substantial increases in non-interest costs are a very real concern.
Smurf, great summary. Perhaps a pity most economists don't have such a logical and commonsense approach.
BillM: yep, obviously I agree with you. I feel reasonably protected against further interest rate falls with only a small amount of cash at call, and the rest earning better rates at term deposits when these were available, but it's irritating that whenever rates are discussed by the government, all the emphasis is placed on those who have borrowed money and virtually no mention of the adverse effect on anyone who has been a saver.
Agree. But where will those depositors go? The whole interest rate environment is similar at present.
Agree. But where will those depositors go? The whole interest rate environment is similar at present.
From the RBA minutes of the last meeting, it sounds like another cut in December too.
Might force more back into the market.
I don't consider savers/retirees being forced to gamb....er....specula....errr...invest in the market a healthy state of affairs in Oz.
Agree. But where will those depositors go? The whole interest rate environment is similar at present.
From the RBA minutes of the last meeting, it sounds like another cut in December too.
Might force more back into the market.
It isn't really easy right now I agree.
And to just SPEND in order to stimulate the economy.Isn't the intention of lowering interest rates to get people/companies/institutions investing more, rather than hoarding cash?
This is where many will come unstuck as we've already seen too often, viz Storm Financial, Banksia, City Pacific et al. Many people will feel they lack the understanding or expertise to invest in the market directly so will take the recommendations of financial advisers (whom they later discover have the interests of the client as very secondary to their own), or be sucked in by advertising for eg City Pacific and ultimately lose much of what they invest.Whether or not it's in the financial markets is a different story (although I'm not personally aware of any other viable alternatives).
And unlikely that these term deposit rates will improve for some time. The Rabo HISA is OK now, but the likelihood would be that I'd move some money over there with all the stuffing about that that involves, and whacko, down would go their rate too.Currently I am putting my cash in the Rabo HISA which is still paying 5.46% with the bonus. Term deposits are really down now, nothing over 5%.
Alert, again!
UBank has now dropped their rates (including bonus) down to 4.91%. The RBA keeps rates steady but UBank continues to drop theirs. I think they will see massive withdrawals.
https://www.ubank.com.au/index.htm
And to just SPEND in order to stimulate the economy.
The jobless rate will go up for a start. Then all sorts of things start happening that forces enough people to spend.I know that's the theory, but can't that reasoning also backfire? Won't savers think "damn, gonna earn less on my money now, so I'll save MORE"
Yes, good point.Isn't it very misleading to continuously reduce the interest rate whilst keeping the 'Money Magazine Winner 2012' sticker? From memory, they had that sticker since interest rate was 6.51% (including bonus) and it deserved such an award. But if they thereafter reduce it to, say, 1%, someone without background knowledge may see it and think it's the best deal out there.
I know that's the theory, but can't that reasoning also backfire? Won't savers think "damn, gonna earn less on my money now, so I'll save MORE"
Yes, good point.
Quite so, Tyler. As has been demonstrated with interest rate cuts so far.
Many people have been scarred by the GFC and have become much more conservative as a result.
I know that's the theory, but can't that reasoning also backfire? Won't savers think "damn, gonna earn less on my money now, so I'll save MORE"
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.