- Joined
- 25 February 2007
- Posts
- 838
- Reactions
- 1
Much the same way a rare stamp can be worth more than it's face value,
Plus the gold in that coin is alone is worth more than it's face value.
You miss the point, it's $50 LEGAL TENDER.
Much the same way a rare stamp can be worth more than it's face value,
Plus the gold in that coin is alone is worth more than it's face value.
But with increased risk, comes an acknowledgement of potentially larger losses. Not many see that either.
You miss the point, it's $50 LEGAL TENDER.
If it wasn't for leveraged investors, the "Savers" stock piles of cash would not be earning interest at all. You can't have "savers" earning interest without borrowers paying interest.
Secondly our system rewards people that take risks as these people are generally more productive, So offcourse a person who just banks money and earns interest not really taking any risk should not have as big a returns as the person who borrows that money and invests it in somthing that adds to the economy
What is your point then, I understand that it is legal tender, all that means is that it has a minimum value of $50.00 should you decide to do somthing silly like bank it or use it in a cash transation.
It's actual value would be much greater than face value due to it's gold content. with a coin like this it can be valued in three ways.
- it can be valued at face value
- it can be valued at it's gold content, which varies due to the spot price of gold
- it can also be valued as a collector coin where it's value is decided by condition, rareity and demand
when it comes to selling it you would value it at which ever one gives you the most profit. offcourse the perth mint being a "for profit corparation" is not going to sell a coin with over $500 of gold in it for $50.
1) Are you inferring that people who save are not as productive as those that borrow? I hope not because that is pure unadulterated B.S.. Perhaps the people who save money just so happen to have worked very hard to save that money to make available to other people.
3) So "savers" (your term, not mine) who are prepared to lend money take less risk that those that borrow money? I think not. It depends on the purpose for which the funds are being used.
4) "Leveraged investors"? Don't you mean gamblers using other people's money?
Maybe the point is.........
If the shan hits the fit, then who is going to pay more than $50 for so called "legal tender" of $50, other that if the intrinisic gold value is worth more at the time.
Yes, maybe it is worth $925 or more to a collector. Though in my mind it sounds a bit of a ripoff.
Exactly.SAVERS at many banks worldwide (where interest rates are already at LOW, LOW values ie 2-3%) must be getting close to pulling the pin. You can't just keep lowering interest rates ad-infinitum to satisfy the approx. 25% of the population with mortgages! How can that be fair to SAVERS who are propping up the banks anyway? The banks are going to shoot themselves in the foot AGAIN unless they DON'T drop deposit interest rates - or better still REWARD savers with a 50BPS INCREASE IN DEPOSIT RATES.
Exactly.
Ok they take it out of the bank where does it go, not shares, has to be property or gold, property may get a short term spike out of this.
Don't you have a mattress???
Exactly.
SAVERS at many banks worldwide (where interest rates are already at LOW, LOW values ie 2-3%) must be getting close to pulling the pin. You can't just keep lowering interest rates ad-infinitum to satisfy the approx. 25% of the population with mortgages! How can that be fair to SAVERS who are propping up the banks anyway? The banks are going to shoot themselves in the foot AGAIN unless they DON'T drop deposit interest rates - or better still REWARD savers with a 50BPS INCREASE IN DEPOSIT RATES.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.