This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Inflation

that would depend on if Europe also builds the facilities to accept delivery ( in the required volumes ) and transport it to regional customers .. at the current rate of decisions that would be a snowflake's change in an erupting volcano .

i have heard some interesting estimates .. but THEN we have the saga of the Siemens turbine to show us the NEW German efficiency ( which is still the manufacturing heart of the EU )

my bet is to consider investing in washcloths
 
They're already under construction.
 
we will see

might be a little difficult with coal impeded by a lower than normal Rhine , Russia's reluctance to send gas via an uncertified pipeline , but maybe the Indian steel industry will get a tail wind
 
that would depend on if Europe also builds the facilities to accept delivery ( in the required volumes ) and transport it to regional customers
They have some and are building more.

The basic problem however is there just isn't an adequate supply of LNG to supply the existing import terminals globally. There's already a shortage - adding more buyers simply makes that even worse.

Hence LNG is now the most expensive fuel around. Coal, fuel oil and even jet fuel are all cheaper on an energy content basis.
 
there is a desire to make Hydrogen a big part of the mix , it seems that Hydrogen will not be created/generated inside the EU

so there will be similar issues for using that as well ( shipping and storage )
 
there is a desire to make Hydrogen a big part of the mix , it seems that Hydrogen will not be created/generated inside the EU

so there will be similar issues for using that as well ( shipping and storage )
If we become a giant H2 producers..i know??...we might soon be able to do a security operation in PNG , the Salomon islands or Timor..
Ohh sorry already done???
 
Australian & Japanese PMIs released today - both down...


Meanwhile on the IR front, market seems to be moving towards a 75bp hike instead of the original 50bp. Hmmmmmmmm
 
Last edited:
How will this affect inflation -

 
YEP !

and the delay on approvals for Acland 3 at New Hope

do anyone not how little coal was sold from New Hope's Queensland mines ?? ( 14,000 tonnes this quarter but none of it sold )

i hope they didn't need the royalties to help balance the state budget

maybe they are stock-piling the coal ready for Hydrogen production ( or for the European winter )
 
And even worse than this, gas was already something that you only really used if you had no other choice, so there isn't even really any substitutes.
 
And even worse than this, gas was already something that you only really used if you had no other choice, so there isn't even really any substitutes.
if that is the case ( i have hardly ever used gas .. except a water heater at one house ) one must ask the purpose behind the push for increased gas usage ( even in preference to existing nuclear power plants )

SXE ( i hold ) had a nice boost in converting miner power plants to gas
 
if that is the case ( i have hardly ever used gas .. except a water heater at one house ) one must ask the purpose behind the push for increased gas usage ( even in preference to existing nuclear power plants )
There are exceptions but for a generic power generation system:

Cheapest to operate = Renewables including wind, solar, hydro etc. Nuclear.

Next cheapest = Coal.

Most expensive = Gas, Oil.

Hence the normal operating approach is to make full use of renewables and nuclear first and foremost, then coal, and to use gas / oil to do the rest.

Reason for building gas / oil plant in the first place is that it's relatively cheap up front. It thus stacks up well economically for seasonal use, peak demand, backup etc since the cheap construction offsets the higher operating cost when use is intermittent. Plus the politics since gas comes with far less controversy than nuclear power or large on river hydro dams and it's generally seen as preferable to coal too. It's an "easy" option both economically and politically to build a new gas-fired power station.

The practical implication for inflation however is that it's rather hard to replace that gas in the short term. If the problem was a lack of coal, uranium or water (hydro) well then gas-fired plant could be placed into constant operation as a means of saving coal, uranium or water. It doesn't really work in reverse though since gas is already used primarily when other sources can't do the job so whilst not zero, the options to ramp up coal or nuclear in order to use less gas are far more limited than the reverse.

To the extent they exist, the options for using more coal to replace gas commonly involve returning disused 50+ year old facilities to operation and so on. Putting back into use things that are still usable technically but they're old, inefficient and relatively high cost - hence why they were closed in the first place. For example Sweden has 3 oil-fired steam (power generating) units back in operation now that date from 1969, 1971 and 1973 respectively, that's a typical example of the approach.

Then there's uses other than power generation.

The average household or office has one method of heating, cooking or providing hot water and no short term ability to switch fuels. If they're using gas, electricity, oil or whatever well that's what they're using, they don't have the equipment to just start using something else.

For industry it varies. Plenty of boilers that can switch between oil and gas for example but when it comes to things like fertilizer production, they're set up for gas and nothing else.

So overall demand for gas is somewhat inelastic. It's not zero but the ability to rapidly substitute something else is relatively limited. Not all but a large portion of the consumption occurs in situations where there's no immediate alternative - either direct uses (eg households and industry) or as "last resort" power generation when other sources are already fully utilised (or unavailable due to maintenance etc).

That's a perfect setup for a price shock. A commodity that's used for "essential" purposes where not all but a large portion of the consumption can't rapidly switch to a substitute.
 
Here's the graph form of a lot of what smurf said:



I couldn't find a higher res shot but you get the idea - some things can only be done with X, some only with Y, some with both, some with one step for X but two or three steps for Y, so on and so forth.

Remember that using the alternative(s) requires essentially retooling and/or building entire refineries to do things the different way (which might still end up more expensive anyway) so in the meantime, until you've retooled your existing plants and/or built new ones, you have *nothing*.

If you can't get your feed stock/base material you need to build a new refinery and/or retool your entire existing plant to use something different.

Even then, you're now doing things the harder/more expensive way which increases costs of the final product (inflation) and can now also be outcompeted by anyone doing things the previous way the moment they, say, reopen the gas pipelines, which means you're going to have to put tariffs in place to stop your new industry from being bankrupted, which only serves to drive up prices (inflation) further.

In short, you are BONED.
 
looks like i will have to keep my axe sharp , some back-up handles , and my timber pre-cut ( and kept dry ) ( and a decent back-up generator )
lucky i didn't opt for the concrete jungle

is going to be interesting with the national GDP once grid power becomes unreliable/mom-existent ( at the current trend they should hit record levels )
 
is going to be interesting with the national GDP once grid power becomes unreliable/mom-existent ( at the current trend they should hit record levels )
Putting this into perspective, the uses of gas can basically be placed into four categories:

1. Gas sold "as gas" to households and businesses who use it for heating, hot water, cooking etc. The majority have literally zero short term alternative.

2. Gas sold to industrial users engaged in complex processes as per the chart posted by over9k and who have no short term alternative other than to cease production.

3. Gas used for electricity generation. In some places it forms essentially the entire power supply or at least a major part of it, they don't have hydro or nuclear etc, but in most places it's a supplement to other sources used when needed.

4. Gas used in industry to fire boilers, kilns and so on. Some do have the ability to switch to some other fuel, some don't.

Bearing in mind the subject is inflation not energy per se but I'll post this chart which puts the use of gas for power generation into perspective. It's for the past 7 days in Victoria but the concept is generic to most power systems globally. Gas shown in orange and for simplicity I've left interstate power transfers off the chart:




From an inflation perspective the basic problem is that the only time gas is being used, is when other sources are already running to their limit. That's where the "gas is the last resort" bit comes from - it's what runs when everything else is already running and insufficient.

The chart's for Victoria but same basic concept anywhere. Gas (or oil (eg diesel)) plant that's cheap to build (but costly to operate) is filling the gaps whilst other plant generates most of the actual electricity.

In the event Europe actually does run out of gas then they won't be left completely without electricity but it's much like the above chart. There'll be times when it simply doesn't matter at all, because other sources are adequate, but at other times it'll bite hard.

Using 2021 data, gas only accounts for 10.4% of electricity generation in Germany for example. The trouble is, as with that chart for Victoria, there are occasions when it's very much greater than the average and any lack of availability will bite hard both physically (worst case the lights really do go out) and in terms of electricity prices on the wholesale market.

For industry with boilers etc some can just burn something else and carry on. For those that don't have that option however they're in trouble.

For industry with complex processes for which there's no alternative, it's game over if gas supply stops.

Same for households although they'll almost certainly be given first priority access to available supplies by government. Whether they can afford to use it is another question....

So overall it's not an "end of the world" situation, there won't be a complete failure of power supply, but if the EU ran out of gas then there'll certainly be trouble both physically and economically. Seriously high prices to households and industry, both for gas "as gas" and for electricity, are one outcome whilst for some industrial users it would mean ceasing production entirely.

Petrochemicals, fertilizers, plastics etc are we'll see any outright shutdowns in their most severe form. That's simply due to lack of flexibility - they need gas and nothing else will do.
 
Last edited:
Neel Kashkari (Fed member) speaking now. To paraphrase him: the Fed is avoiding food and crude oil prices when trying to determine monetary policy given their inherent volatility
This should make Friday's US PCE Core Price Index an important data point to watch, as the print will likely play a significant role in shaping expectations for the September FOMC Meeting, and therefore market direction in the build-up.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...