- Joined
- 20 July 2021
- Posts
- 11,738
- Reactions
- 16,363
China will be quite willing to help and JV , with their ( new ) major supplier ( in many commodities )Because a lot of it is beyond their control. When the infrastructure for 3 million barrels a day of russian oil is either blown up or crumbles from lack of maintenance, what then?
Remember back when the lockdowns first hit: Everything, but most of all, energy, PLUMMETED. We didn't see any big inflation in anything other than tech really, precisely because everyone were at home and therefore NOT going out and doing stuff/consuming energy.
Bring that demand back online with 25% of the world's oil offline and it's a massacre. You might have increased the supply of whatever you're producing (microchips or steel or whatever) but you've increased demand for the very energy necessary to produce them.
Green energy is no substitute for coal/oil and this is something all the woke countries have learned the very hard way over the last few months. Take a look at ICLN (clean energy etf) vs IXC (big oil etf) year to date to get an idea:
View attachment 141267
If anything, the last 4 months has actually exposed green energy for the complete fool's errand that it is.
India's power generation is overwhelmingly coal but they're already trying to turn the screws on the russians to send them cheap oil, but fact is that india is right next to the persian gulf, has unrestricted access to the oceans, and a very young population (read: supply of labour and demand for consumer goods). India will be to the next 30 years what china was to the last 30.China will be quite willing to help and JV , with their ( new ) major supplier ( in many commodities )
Russia isn't exacting a stone-age economy , but they build things that are robust and durable ( and sure they look crude and lack refinement but they will do so for 20 years or more , with minimal upkeep ) they will create the infrastructure need , and the Chinese will see it is in their best interests to help where they can
the confounding factor will be how much will India participate in the mix ( they are sending exploration probes to Mars , so they are quite technologically capable as well )
i think seismic is baked into the cake , regardless of US decisions , a lot of OPEC is now US-neutral ( or unfriendly )The only thing that really has me worried is the U.S president's ability to restrict or outright ban ALL u.s oil exports. If that happens, the effect will be seismic.
Mongolia , North Korea and Russia have plenty of coal ( and if they overthrow the regime in QLD , they has some undeveloped coal as well , ready to go brownfields )India's power generation is overwhelmingly coal but they're already trying to turn the screws on the russians to send them cheap oil, but fact is that india is right next to the persian gulf, has unrestricted access to the oceans, and a very young population (read: supply of labour and demand for consumer goods). India will be to the next 30 years what china was to the last 30.
A huge part of the russian infrastructure was built (and continued to be maintained) by western companies like schlumberger. Things like the pipelines going from the baku fields (the caspian sea) across to the black sea to be loaded into tankers that then ship to the wider world. Those companies are GONE. So what happens once things start breaking and there's nobody left to fix them?
OPEC are already pumping pretty much flat out and you can't just bring millions of barrels a day of oil online and delivered in five minutes. Fact is we have sanctions on ~5 million barrels a day of russian oil at the moment and about another ~3 million that's going to go offline when it crumbles from lack of maintenance or simply having to be switched off in the cold (which wrecks it anyways).
Remember that a lot of russian oil comes from areas with permafrost - it's not as simple as just opening or closing the taps in a -40 environment.
In some ways, but I think it’s more about trust in a country’s reserve bank and the country’s underlying economy, which pollies like to pretend they control, but which are largely independent.yes , BUT a currency is also a symbol of trust in the government ( and their economic management )
China I agree could be temporary, albeit with the prospect of recurrence, but I really can't see the world being keen on sourcing goods from Russia anytime soon.Interesting to note the inflationary drivers they're considering are Russia-Ukraine and China lockdown. These will likely be temporary drivers of inflation
as a result of the current sanctions , i would think Russia would be extremely reluctant to sell anything at all to 'unfriendly nations ' for an extended period of time and may even repeat the 'Iron Curtain ' for another seventy plus yearsChina I agree could be temporary, albeit with the prospect of recurrence, but I really can't see the world being keen on sourcing goods from Russia anytime soon.
Unless something changes, that could end up as a generational conflict in my view.
A few thoughts on the energy stuff (keeping the focus on the financial more than the engineering):@Smurf1976 Feel free to chime in with anything you think I've missed here.
My thinking is the sort of timeframe that's indefinite until a new paradigm emerges due to some future situation.so is that one generation ( seen to be 20 to 30 years ) or an open-ended time-line ( 20 years plus )
yes , i think long but indefinite , as wellMy thinking is the sort of timeframe that's indefinite until a new paradigm emerges due to some future situation.
Point being I'm not expecting it to be over in any timeframe soon enough to be of relevance (but how long is anyone's guess).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?