JohnDe
La dolce vita
- Joined
- 11 March 2020
- Posts
- 4,404
- Reactions
- 6,451
Yeah, money's not going nearly as far as it used to.
I'd intended on getting a trophy wife one day but the way prices are inflating I'm only going to get a participation trophy.
Looting of the middle class, the poor get more support, the rich get richer and the middle class slides down the ladder paying for it. ?
Can't wait to see how this all looks in three years time.
no point , that dream is likely to be a hopium-induced fantasy ( and they are likely addicted to that hopium , prescribed as a treatment for copium )If the media thinks that inflation is under control, someone had better tell them they are dreaming IMO.
spoiler alert , the middle class are much poorer but the gap to the poor looks so much narrower that the poor believe they are better off ( despite only getting more promises ) because normal people can't understand the fiscally insane elites ( who hide everything in 'charitable foundations ' and trusts )Looting of the middle class, the poor get more support, the rich get richer and the middle class slides down the ladder paying for it. ?
Can't wait to see how this all looks in three years time.
The problem with the public health system, is everyone dropping out of the private health system and joining the queue for public funded services.I recognise as it's in your face there is a focus on housing. To me the more worrying issue is this from the latest CPI figures.
View attachment 156350
Governments at all levels and all persuasions have underinvested in public health for decades. We are now seeing the results of that with patients waiting years for treatment in the public system. Basic reason is a shortage of practitioners. Even if it was started now it will take yonks to increase that number anywhere above the attrition rate. Paying practitioners more does not increase the workforce where many are leaving the public system due to burnout.
Here is the rub. Even if the number could be increased it is going to cost a motza. And that motza involves taxes. You want a viable public health system then you gotta pay for it.
i never joined , since i have dentures and a long history of poor health , private health was never a serious option ( not even to invest in )The problem with the public health system, is everyone dropping out of the private health system and joining the queue for public funded services.
So that in turn forces the private health insurers to increase premiums, which then causes more people to drop out, $100/wk for private health cover isn't a small cost, most of the people i know have dropped out.
Yes he did, and the 2 policies left were ok with extra no claim bonus etcChanging insurers??????
Participation is the best bit thoughYeah, money's not going nearly as far as it used to.
I'd intended on getting a trophy wife one day but the way prices are inflating I'm only going to get a participation trophy.
The problem with the public health system, is everyone dropping out of the private health system and joining the queue for public funded services.
So that in turn forces the private health insurers to increase premiums, which then causes more people to drop out, $100/wk for private health cover isn't a small cost, most of the people i know have dropped out.
Also the increase in problems associated with lifestyle eating habits and the consumption of other things that affluent societies can afford to indulge themselves in.That is a common belief but it is only a small part. It is overall demand increase including that for services such as physiotherapy, podiatry and a range of other health professional services including attendances at ED for minor issues when a GP cannot be accessed or a patient cannot afford the out-of-pocket cost.
As an investment it has its advantages, the Govt's can't afford to not have the private sector help foot the bill, it's a bit like social housing the Govt doesn't want to supply it, so they give out all the perks, for the private sector to run it.i never joined , since i have dentures and a long history of poor health , private health was never a serious option ( not even to invest in )
Topical, my client this morning is an ED doctor at Royal Perth and relayed exactly what he was saying you that probably the majority of her cases have their basis in mental illness.it is also astounding the amount of substance related mental health issues that bog the system down, it certainly is a complex issue.
that is a Government problem QLD had a free health-care system funded by the state lotteries , BUT the Federal Government desired control , a database and equality across the land ... and here we are , more rules , a tax grab ( medicare levy ) and more billing fraud , and of course high ranking Government staff get themselves a 'gold card ' for helping create the system ( or is that conundrum )As an investment it has its advantages, the Govt's can't afford to not have the private sector help foot the bill, it's a bit like social housing the Govt doesn't want to supply it, so they give out all the perks, for the private sector to run it.
With healthcare, all the Govt has is a big stick, to force those who can afford it to pay for it, so in a way it is a quasi Govt service.
As with everything else though, the Govt has to keep lowering the level the stick cuts in at and the more the middle class slide down the ladder.
In W.A a similar system was in operation, most people had private health insurance because it was cheap, those who didn't the State Govt picked up the tab.that is a Government problem QLD had a free health-care system funded by the state lotteries , BUT the Federal Government desired control , a database and equality across the land ... and here we are , more rules , a tax grab ( medicare levy ) and more billing fraud , and of course high ranking Government staff get themselves a 'gold card ' for helping create the system ( or is that conundrum )
the Federal Government wanted it , they took it , they mishandled it , taxed it , they half privatized it and now they they want sympathy
how about NO !! ( sympathy at all )
QLD had a system all the states could have copied , instead i hold TAH and TLC because the QLD Government just had to monetize an income asset ( after no longer needing to fund the hospital system )
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?