Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Inflation

No he quotes figures in other videos that are wrong. Is off with what's actually going on in certain areas.
It's not the predictions, it's multiple other things that probably aren't his forte.
Cam you list a few examples?
 
Cam you list a few examples?
sinaloa cartel assessment was sketch.

Some of the figures he is sprouting in the evs episode is way out.

He said Putin was mid 60s when he is 70.

His assessment on Zhao Lijian was wrong. He got dumped from his minute of silence when asked about the protests. Not because of wolf warrior standing. They still have multiple hard-liners.
 
It's a lagging indicator of what happened over the last year. Shouldn't we be interested in what's happening next not what happened last?



Yes.
I agree, although it does tend to move markets. Admittedly, it might be short-lived.

What is the other factor do you think will halt this rally?
 
I agree, although it does tend to move markets. Admittedly, it might be short-lived.
I already tried to convince y'all that it doesn't move markets, but *shrug*, believe what you like.

What is the other factor do you think will halt this rally?

I watch a bunch of things, but one could do worse than taking the other side of consensus on this forum, when people here are saying "I could see this running until the next Fed meeting.", we're probably done, no?

Just think of how bearish everyone here was on GBP right at the bottom on Sep 22 or thinking the world was ending because of Credit Suisse etc etc.
 
I already tried to convince y'all that it doesn't move markets, but *shrug*, believe what you like.



I watch a bunch of things, but one could do worse than taking the other side of consensus on this forum, when people here are saying "I could see this running until the next Fed meeting.", we're probably done, no?

Just think of how bearish everyone here was on GBP right at the bottom on Sep 22 or thinking the world was ending because of Credit Suisse etc etc.

Fair point
 
Market is pricing in a 25bps hike though....

View attachment 151580
They did this with several others though, when a couple of data points came in off expectations (and markets went nuts in response) it was all "oh the fed will have to do X, the fed will have to do Y" etc etc and the fed went NOPE we're doing exactly what we said we would and markets then went bonkers back in the other direction as everyone started unwinding everything.
 
They did this with several others though, when a couple of data points came in off expectations (and markets went nuts in response) it was all "oh the fed will have to do X, the fed will have to do Y" etc etc and the fed went NOPE we're doing exactly what we said we would and markets then went bonkers back in the other direction as everyone started unwinding everything.

Yeah, I agree the Fed has stuck to their guns. Just trying to test for deficiencies in my understanding.
 
Yeah, I agree the Fed has stuck to their guns. Just trying to test for deficiencies in my understanding.
Yeah, markets might be pricing a different fed action but they've been wrong literally EVERY other time so I don't see why they're going to be right this time.

I mean famous last words but I don't foresee why the fed would not stick to its word this time when it has every other time.

The markets strike me as moronic at this point but I can see why you're second guessing yourself as it all appears so dumb that you're thinking they might know something you don't.

I'm betting on a 50.
 
Still way too much money sloshing around in consumer land and the welfare/basic wage/covid stimulus still working its way through IMO.
It won't end, I am thinking sooner or later they will offer either a renter stimulus or landlord stimulus package to offset the raising rents/repayments or perhaps both and a first home buyer grant
 
It won't end, I am thinking sooner or later they will offer either a renter stimulus or landlord stimulus package to offset the raising rents/repayments or perhaps both and a first home buyer grant
Maybe, but IMO eventually they have to admit that the more you subsidies the poor, they end up giving it to rich in some form or other, be it in increased rent, increased prices to cover the cost of increased wages, which then feeds into the cost of everything from Govt projects, to building, to everything people do to earn a living etc, which is inflation.
They can't keep subsidising housing IMO, the Govt have to bite the bullet and get back into building social housing, in house. They need to re start State housing public works departments and employ people to build them. As with the failure of globalisation, the failure of outsourcing public housing to the private sector is proving a disaster IMO.

Some time or another, there has to be a stop, Hawke and Keating did it with the wages accord, Howard Costello did it by introducing the GST and privatising a lot of Govt services which allowed them to reduce taxation. Eventually the input costs have to be stabilised, so that the output cost can be stabilised.

Unfortunately those at the bottom of the food chain feel it most, money gives people options, those at the bottom of the food chain have a limited supply of money, therefore the options are also limited. That is what drives people to go to work, very few go to work because they just love it.
Of course you have unfortunate people who due to circumstances can't work, that's why there are different forms of welfare.
Just so that I don't have to answer that one next post. :rolleyes:


If something isn't done, the costs go up then the wages and prices go up, then the rents go up, then the welfare goes up, that keeps repeating.
What you end up with then, is inflation in the stratosphere, well that's my take on it from my life's experience.

How Albo puts a lid on it will be interesting IMO, he has a lot of fires, on a lot of fronts and most are inflationary.:2twocents

But there are smarter people that will be able to explain the intricasies of it and there will be others that tell me I'm wrong, that's the fun of discussion.. :xyxthumbs
 
Last edited:
Maybe, but IMO eventually they have to admit that the more you subsidies the poor, they end up giving it to rich in some form or other, be it in increased rent, increased prices to cover the cost of increased wages, which then feeds into the cost of everything from Govt projects, to building, to everything people do to earn a living etc, which is inflation.
They can't keep subsidising housing IMO, the Govt have to bite the bullet and get back into building social housing, in house. They need to re start State housing public works departments and employ people to build them. As with the failure of globalisation, the failure of outsourcing public housing to the private sector is proving a disaster IMO.

Some time or another, there has to be a stop, Hawke and Keating did it with the wages accord, Howard Costello did it by introducing the GST and privatising a lot of Govt services which allowed them to reduce taxation. Eventually the input costs have to be stabilised, so that the output cost can be stabilised.

Unfortunately those at the bottom of the food chain feel it most, money gives people options, those at the bottom of the food chain have a limited supply of money, therefore the options are also limited. That is what drives people to go to work, very few go to work because they just love it.
Of course you have unfortunate people who due to circumstances can't work, that's why there are different forms of welfare.
Just so that I don't have to answer that one next post. :rolleyes:


If something isn't done, the costs go up then the wages and prices go up, then the rents go up, then the welfare goes up, that keeps repeating.
What you end up with then, is inflation in the stratosphere, well that's my take on it from my life's experience.

How Albo puts a lid on it will be interesting IMO, he has a lot of fires, on a lot of fronts and most are inflationary.:2twocents

But there are smarter people that will be able to explain the intricasies of it and there will be others that tell me I'm wrong, that's the fun of discussion.. :xyxthumbs
totally agree, the first step would be to change those in charge bias of not being vested in re so deep but how can that be done or we are chasing our own tail with yet another stimulus and raise
 

Nice little article from the Fed about what will happen to inflation in the long run. Interesting that they considered the possibility that we E no longer in the era of great moderation
 
Top