- Joined
- 19 February 2016
- Posts
- 957
- Reactions
- 1,552
As much as I would like to see this I think the Labor party will do everything in their power to drag this out or give it as much power and support as ASIC (which is F-All). Labor are just as corruptible as the liberals and all the backroom people will be reminding all those labor members who keeps them in place.My thoughts for immediate action ( this year) are
1) Introduction of Federal ICAC legislation with teeth and resources within 6 months
Remit to cover the last 10 years and ongoing investigations. An initial resource allocation of staffing to enable multiple investigations for the first 3 years to deal with an anticipated back log of cases. This would be reduced as these cases are dealt with.
And that's why they'll be a one term government. Without resources Australia is a 3rd world country where the only foreign currency comes from tourists visiting Sydney, Tropical QLD, and Uluru. But really I can't wait to hear and read all the rhetoric on the evils of coal and oil and how labor is helping the environment from SBS, ABC, and the Guardian only to see more and more oil and coal projects given the go-ahead over the next 3 years. This government will just keep the left entertained with debates on gender rights, free dental care, millionaire taxes, and corporations doing their part to fight climate change. The only real change will be a different list of corporate and union scumbags getting government handouts and people like me will getting even bigger tax breaks to buy $200,000 electric vehicles and expensive solar panels for my million dollar home(s).My thoughts for immediate action ( this year) are
2) Immediate suspension of new gas and coal proposals
This would be coupled with substantial speeding up of renewable energy and energy storage projects as well as interconnectors and a strong legislative framework that encouraged investment in these areas and quality projects.
Would also be necessary to encourage current gas projects to stay in place/expand to meet short term needs.
These are critical elements of the Teals, Green and Labour agenda. If they aren't moved on ASAP Labour would almost certainly risk even further movement to Teals and The Greens. The actions would be seen as a political clean up act and a reset of Australia's energy future.
As much as I would like to see this I think the Labor party will do everything in their power to drag this out or give it as much power and support as ASIC (which is F-All). Labor are just as corruptible as the liberals and all the backroom people will be reminding all those labor members who keeps them in place.
And that's why they'll be a one term government. Without resources Australia is a 3rd world country where the only foreign currency comes from tourists visiting Sydney, Tropical QLD, and Uluru. But really I can't wait to hear and read all the rhetoric on the evils of coal and oil and how labor is helping the environment from SBS, ABC, and the Guardian only to see more and more oil and coal projects given the go-ahead over the next 3 years. This government will just keep the left entertained with debates on gender rights, free dental care, millionaire taxes, and corporations doing their part to fight climate change. The only real change will be a different list of corporate and union scumbags getting government handouts and people like me will getting even bigger tax breaks to buy $200,000 electric vehicles and expensive solar panels for my million dollar home(s).
I don't dismiss renewables. I dismiss all my tax dollars going into the pockets of companies and think tanks run by millionaires and billionaires who promise some kind of "new" renewable technology just so they get a better parking spot for their jet when they go to Davos and get to sit at the big kids table. I have a problem when XYZ mining company gets paid to put up a solar or wind farm probably sourced entirely from overseas components and the beneficiaries are offshore hedge funds. Or alternatively when a big operation has to use diesel rather than gas because the government lets APA do whatever it wants.A strong independent well resourced ICAC would be a double edged sword. Yes Labour politicians and administrations could come under scrutiny ( remember NSW Edie Obeid scandal) . I suggest fair minded citizens would welcome that scrutiny.
However at this stage the most likely targets for investigation will be a multitude of Coalition deals/decisions made in the last 10 years that stank at the time and have become riper ever since.
---------------------------------
I'm surprised at your dismissal of a renewable energy industry as part of the resources industry. Industry and the mining industry have reached the stage of welcoming an acceleration of renewable energy development. The bottom line is that renewable energy is cheaper than any fossil fuel development. Mining companies are looking at renewable energy projects to reduce their energy costs.
Companies like FMG are determined to turn solar and power energy into green hydrogen for high value exportable energy resources. Even the current Federal Government recognised the economic value of producing vast amounts of solar electricity and selling overseas via undersea cables. That project is on it's way with Sun Power.
There is also a strong industry recognition that electrifying Australia will create new profitable enterprises that will also save industry and consumers money.
Exporting solar energy under the sea: a potential world first for Australian technology
Australia’s largest renewable energy infrastructure project, Sun Cable’s Australian-ASEAN Power Link, aims to export solar power from Australia to Singapore. Read the emissions reduction case study.www.industry.gov.au
Electrifying Australian households will save billions – report - Energy Monitor
With government investment and streamlined planning, widespread electrification of Australian households can save energy and cut costs.www.energymonitor.ai
As a block, when you look you see;We see a new political landscape in Australia.
What do posters see as policy directions and priorities for the new Parliament ?
I actually think there would be a point of difference between Labor and the coalition regarding any future cases. Time and time again we have seen conservative governments at both state and federal levels double down and protect their own when faced with allegations. By comparison I have firm memories of Labor people being sacked from the outset.I would love ICAC. But like I said, I think they'll drag it out for fear It'll eat a few of their own.
There are many things I don't know about but one I do know there's a problem with is energy.What do posters see as policy directions and priorities for the new Parliament ?
From what @Smurf1976 explained it will be self resolving, the Greens/Teals and probably a major sector of labor want no further gas exploration, therefore in the next couple of winters two things are likely to happen over East IMO, domestic heating gas prices will skyrocket and the cost of electricity will skyrocket, people need heat in winter.The market is fairly nonplussed with the result. Sure it's up this morning, but in line with overseas index futures.
Even coal has shrugged it off.
Probably already priced in.The market is fairly nonplussed with the result. Sure it's up this morning, but in line with overseas index futures.
Even coal has shrugged it off.
From what @Smurf1976 explained it will be self resolving, the Greens/Teals and probably a major sector of labor want no further gas exploration, therefore in the next couple of winters two things are likely to happen over East IMO, domestic heating gas prices will skyrocket and the cost of electricity will skyrocket, people need heat in winter.
So what I mean by it will be self resolving is, the Greens will soften their stance, or people will pay a hell of a lot more for their energy, if that happens the next election will be a reversal. Wash, rinse, repeat.
I'm not sure on that issue, I have heard of it, but I've never bothered looking into the intricacies. Having said that I really can't see labor/Greens and Teals pushing for a larger gas allocation, it kind of flies in the face of what they represented to the electorate.Isn't the immediate problem for the East Coast (gas) simply supply due to the lack of policy allowing enough gas for domestic use?
Further to the above post and the East coast gas issue
Absolutely spot on, there is a huge difference between promising something with no knowledge of the outcome and delivering on that promise, when you become aware of the outcomes.The inherent nature of gas fields is that you have to keep running in order to stand still. Drill a well, put it into production, gas flows but in due course pressure drops and the flow diminishes. Either keep drilling or total production falls away rather rapidly.
With basically no spare capacity as it is that means any thought of a "no new gas" approach requires an almost immediate large scale move away from using it. That doesn't just mean industry but it also means households and small business, indeed in Victoria's case residential accounts for the majority of peak day gas demand so that's where the focus needs to be.
Bringing gas from Queensland doesn't get around that. It still requires ongoing drilling, it still needs things built that some are opposed to.
Politically, this could get interesting if the Teals or Greens want to force it (and politics is my point in mentioning it).
On the physical side, I'll avoid derailing this thread and make some comment about the numbers and so on in another thread.
The inherent nature of gas fields is that you have to keep running in order to stand still. Drill a well, put it into production, gas flows but in due course pressure drops and the flow diminishes. Either keep drilling or total production falls away rather rapidly.
With basically no spare capacity as it is that means any thought of a "no new gas" approach requires an almost immediate large scale move away from using it. That doesn't just mean industry but it also means households and small business, indeed in Victoria's case residential accounts for the majority of peak day gas demand so that's where the focus needs to be.
Bringing gas from Queensland doesn't get around that. It still requires ongoing drilling, it still needs things built that some are opposed to.
Politically, this could get interesting if the Teals or Greens want to force it (and politics is my point in mentioning it).
On the physical side, I'll avoid derailing this thread and make some comment about the numbers and so on in another thread.
The question is how quickly can we move to renewables and some sort of baseload replacement, whether that be by nuclear or battery.Absolutely no getting away from gas as an essential part of our current domestic/industrial energy needs. Greens and Labour would be dead meat if they don't recognise that reality.
So the issue is moving ASAP to minimum gas usage through electrification in the longer term but at the same time ensuring sufficient gas supplies at reasonable prices for short/medium term use. How does that happen ? Good question ....
But IMO this doesn't mean we need to develop vast new gas fields largely for export or not move very quickly to renewable energy power production.
The question is how quickly can we move to renewables and some sort of baseload replacement, whether that be by nuclear or battery.
Battery storage is not viable on the grand scale in the short/medium term, so that leaves nuclear which does not seem to be palatable to greens/teals.
So the "climate bill" got passed through parliament and is now legislation/law to reduce emissions by at least 43% by 2030 & to pursue a net zero target by 2050
Climate bill passes parliament, making 43 per cent reduction target law
The federal government's landmark climate bill passes parliament with the help of the Greens, Jacqui Lambie Network and David Pocock.www.abc.net.au
But IMO this doesn't mean we need to develop vast new gas fields largely for export or not move very quickly to renewable energy power production.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?