wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,951
- Reactions
- 13,245
That's not how it works.There are more and more people.As the population increases so must money supply (unless we all want to be poor. )
Unfortunately the side effect of this is erosion of the value of our currency...
I have a question.
How often is the IMF correct in it's projections? I have no idea of the answer, but the odd time I have taken notice, they are dead wrong. Not to say they mightn't be eventually correct in this instance, just question how much stock can be put in their reports.
Of course. But if you don't publish them, you only obliged to recall the correct ones. LOLThat same quote could be applied to many observations by the those making them, especially to the marketplace.
As time passes its enivitable that everyone will get a right call on opposing points in the cycle.
There are more and more people.As the population increases so must money supply (unless we all want to be poor. )
Unfortunately the side effect of this is erosion of the value of our currency...
I'm deadly serious. It is far more complex than that.Oh come on, of course it works like that...
You can't be serious? How do you think it works?
Uncle,
I find that when folks run out of logic, they resort to satire and/or non sequitur, both of which are evident in the post you refer to.
for e.g. Look at what Peter Schiff has to put up with on Bubblevision... same nonsense.
Cheers
The China boom isn't based on a very sound financial system, and it is this that will ultimately bring a correction.
Chopster,
Chinese macro example - the latest 'fad' is for Chinese solar cell manufacturers to do IPO's to American's. Manufacture of cells has ramped up to the point of oversupply. Transpose this to any other sector you care to name & you then get the idea of what's happening in China - easy credit chasing hot sectors with low profit margins.
That's how the China machine works - high volume, low margins. When you get to the stage of overproduction combined with a reduction in demand eg the US consumer credit cycle turning due to the housing bust then simple economics dictates that the company with the lowest margin is restrained or goes broke. This is happening now. More eg's to follow....
Everything is connected
PS tonight's markets should be interesting
How is comparing a perma bear to chicken little ad hominem? And more to the point, how can an analogy be regarded as a personal insult? It's apt.Chops,
Present your arguments, but leave the ad hominem nonsense out.
1/ I am not a perma-bear. I am bearish at the moment. I will readily become a bull when I think the time is right. By the way my portfolio consists of longs at the moment, so I consider myself as a pragmatist with an eye on risks in the economy.How is comparing a perma bear to chicken little ad hominem? And more to the point, how can an analogy be regarded as a personal insult? It's apt.
I believe I gave a very good response and presented an argument that is along the lines of what Mark Douglas teaches.
It was you that decided that my post was illogical, and an ad hominem statement followed. It's there if you want to read it again.
Oh.. is that why Full Frontal got axed?wayneL said:3/ Satire is offensive.
How is comparing a perma bear to chicken little ad hominem? And more to the point, how can an analogy be regarded as a personal insult? It's apt.
I believe I gave a very good response and presented an argument that is along the lines of what Mark Douglas teaches.
It was you that decided that my post was illogical, and an ad hominem statement followed. It's there if you want to read it again.
Once again, hardly.It's becoming obvious that you get too caught up in the semantics of the discussion rather than presenting a credible alternative.
I call the shots as I see them and as the facts present themselves, I don't regard myself as a 'permabear' either; I trade on the facts present and possible outcomes are postulated on the facts.
It's becoming obvious that you get too caught up in the semantics of the discussion rather than presenting a credible alternative.
And please try to not resort to personal degradation when you have nothing to contribute.
lol, come on guys, your both smart dudes. No need for the flirtation
I personally, have split my risk by holding about 45% of my portfolio in cash, waiting for a correction to buy cheap, and the rest encase the bull continues until the years end.
Each to their own.
Uncle, your an economist I gather? Where did you study? Or are you a self taught economist?
BTW, do you have a round about time when you think a correction might take place? I said in the last quarter of the year, but since these latest inflation figures, Im not so sure now. I think a small correction of say 5% may happen again in the next few months, but that we may push into next year before experiencing a 20% correction. Im not overly knowledgable on the Chinese economy, but one thing I worry about, is the quality of data and indicators coming out of China.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?