A daily free newsletter by Chuck Butler (Everbank), can find through the Kitco site, often discusses the job numbers among many other Forex trading matters. Only a few months back the job number was 260,000 as compared to the 70,000 you quote. The issue that is glaring if one looks deeper is the rhetorical spin from Wall street prior to the release of such figures. If the number to come out is a drop Wall Street pundits will bandi about an expected number some 20 or 30% below the actual so that when the news is released the headline "Much Better than Expected" takes centre stage and away the market goes again.
In these uncertain times it is worth while listening to some of the news releases directly rather than through the full media filter to your home newspapar. I tend to keep a lot of past figures and charts on my wall above the computer screen for refence. Watch the bugg-rs.
Was listening to ABC radio business roundup this morning and commentator saying that he thought probably US would not go into recession. Spare may days, if you follow the figures properly they have been in it for some months and the situation is dire. If you dont' wake the sheep up we may be able to slaughter the lot of em without a sound.
explod,
I don't know where you get your numbers from but NFP's have not been 260k or more since February 2006. Employment growth has slowed considerably in the last 12 months. A jobs number of anything less than 70,000 for December would mean a less than 1% growth in employment in the last 12 months. Still if you are looking for an economic indicator that points to recession employment is a horribly lagging one.
I agree that the writing has been on the wall for some time. I have been saying there will be a US recession in 2008 on my blog since early August 2007.
I think it is common knowledge that Wall Street sets bars that it can step over rather than jump. As you say looking beyond the hype is key to understanding the real picture.