Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Imminent and severe market correction

This quite long (http://www.compareshares.com.au/zeal52.php) but it does pose a method of analysis that I was not familiar with, ie Long Valuation Waves.

US markets
The worst is yet to come
July 21, 2008
Adam Hamilton, Zeal Research

In recent weeks a major secular milestone was achieved in the US stock markets. But because of all the distracting market turbulence, very few investors are even aware it happened. And truth be told, even if the markets weren’t plunging I still suspect only the most diligent students of the markets would have any inkling.

The venerable Dow Jones Industrial Average, or Dow 30, finally returned to fair value as measured by its price-to-earnings ratio. This is major secular milestone because it marks the halfway point in the 17-year secular bear in which the Dow 30, and the broader US stock markets, have been mired since early 2000. Understanding the implications of this milestone is exceedingly important for all stock investors.


Some background is in order. Throughout history, the stock markets oscillate in great cycles running a third of a century each. These cycles are defined by prevailing valuations, the P/E ratios of the broader US stock markets. The stock markets go from undervalued, to overvalued, and back again over a 34-year span. I call these Long Valuation Waves and you can read all about them in another essay.

The first half of any LVW is a 17-year great bull market, like we saw from 1982 to 2000. Valuations go from deeply undervalued levels at its start to extremely overvalued levels at its apex. Once the great bull peaks, though, the 17-year great bear emerges for the second half of the LVW. Valuations are gradually whittled away from extremely overvalued levels to deeply undervalued levels. And then like a phoenix this cycle begins anew.

Now today, since the US stock markets have essentially drifted sideways for 8 years, a decent fraction of contrarian investors are aware of valuation-wave theory. But back in the early 2000s, it was long-forgotten by nearly all. To establish my bona fides in this line of research, I wrote my initial essays on this in December 2001, March 2002, and October 2002 back when thinking this way was heretical and ridiculed.

Within the second half of an LVW that witnesses a 17-year great bear, the defining characteristic is contracting valuations. The first half of this 17-year period is a mean reversion of index P/E ratios. Valuations go from extremely overvalued levels back down to fair value, reverting to their centuries-old average. With the Dow 30 hitting fair value, this mean-reversion stage of the secular bear is now complete.

This chart, updated from my October 2002 original one, shows this process visually. It looks complicated, but it is straightforward. The pair of blue lines is the index P/E ratio for the Dow 30. At Zeal we compute these critical numbers, along with the S&P 500’s and NASDAQ 100’s P/Es, once a month and publish them in our monthly newsletter. Watching index valuations is incredibly important for all long-term investors.

The light blue line is the Dow 30’s simple average P/E ratio. Individual P/E ratios for all 30 component companies are gathered and then averaged. But this measure can be skewed by a relatively small component experiencing a wild valuation anomaly driven by some non-recurring one-time earnings event. Thus I prefer weighting the individual component P/E ratios by each component’s market capitalization.

The dark blue line is the market-capitalization-weighted-average (MCWA) P/E. The bigger any component company, the more weight its P/E ratio is given. This measure is much harder to skew since earnings anomalies are much less common in the largest components compared to the smallest ones. For the rest of this essay, whenever I discuss P/E ratios they will be MCWA trailing (past 12 months, not estimated future) earnings.

The red line is the headline Dow 30 itself that you watch every day. The white line is where the Dow 30 would hypothetically be if it traded at fair value, or 14x (pronounced “fourteen times”) earnings. I’ll discuss this fair-value concept in more depth below. Finally the yellow line is the Dow 30’s dividend yield. Slaved to the right axis, 3000 means 3%. Dividend yields are an important secondary measure of stock-market valuations.

Back in early 2000, the Dow 30 traded deep into bubble territory at a stupendously rich 45x earnings! But since then valuations have been gradually contracting, as they always do in secular bears, while the index itself has largely remained flat. By grinding sideways, the markets effectively grant time for corporate earnings to catch up with prevailing stock prices. This drives the valuation mean reversion.

As valuations contracted over the past 8 years, the fair-value Dow rose. Since the index’s P/E ratio finally hit 14x fair value at the end of June, the fair-value Dow has converged with the actual Dow. Back in 2000, bulls foolishly believed that P/E ratios could stay high forever because we had to be in “A New Era”. But this chart shows how silly it was to believe the bubble hype then and ignore stock-market history. Mania valuations never last.

This fair-value concept is very important to understand. Why 14x earnings? Over centuries, across many stock markets in many great nations, 14x earnings has simply been the long-term average valuation for common stocks. Sometimes valuations are higher, sometimes lower, but they always oscillate around a secular mathematical average of 14x. While long-established historical validity is enough proof, this number is quite logical too.

Stock markets exist solely to facilitate capital transfers between those with surplus capital (savers, investors) and those who need capital (debtors in a loose sense, companies). In order to transfer this capital, both sides of the deal need a fair and mutually-beneficial exchange. If capital is too cheap, investors won’t offer it up for investment. If it is too expensive, companies won’t want to “borrow” it. 14x is just right for both parties.

Interestingly the inverse of 14x earnings is a 7.1% yield. If an investor buys stock at a 14x P/E, it will take the company 14 years to fully earn back the price he paid. Without compounding, this translates to 7% or so. 7% is both a fair rate of return for investors’ hard-earned capital and a fair price to pay by companies who need this capital. All over the world for at least hundreds of years, capital has flowed freely at 14x and 7%.

Stock markets oscillate around this 14x fair-value level because this is where the markets clear, all investors with surplus capital have the opportunity to invest it and all companies that want surplus capital have the opportunity to procure it. So this fair-value concept for stocks is not only historically verifiable, but it is eminently logical too. After 8 long years of mean reverting, it is exciting to see the Dow fairly valued again.

This 14x fair-value point is also the anchor from which undervaluation and overvaluation are objectively measured. At half fair value, 7x earnings, stocks are very cheap historically. As soon as you see 7x earnings in the major stock indexes, it is time to throw every dollar you’ve got at the deeply undervalued stock markets. Such levels are only seen at the end of 17-year secular bears, like 1982.

Conversely double fair value, 28x, is classical bubble levels. Once the major stock indexes trade above 28x earnings, it is time to think about exiting investments and preparing for the end of the 17-year secular bull. If you look at a Long Valuation Wave chart over the last century or so, the importance of 7x, 14x, and 28x index P/E ratios is readily apparent. Stock-market history is crystal clear regarding valuation ranges.

The implications of the Dow once again hitting 14x earnings today, for the first time since the late 1980s, are profound. Seeing fair value again validates the thesis that we are in a secular bear, where stocks at best trade sideways for 17 years! Since 17 years is such a huge chunk of any investor’s investing lifespan, it is absolutely devastating for wealth creation to be trapped unaware within one of these secular bears.

And if you add 17 years to the top of the last LVW in early 2000, you get out to 2016 or so for the projected end of this bear. We are only halfway through temporally and even more importantly in valuation terms. Bear markets don’t end at fair value, they continue their relentless valuation-mauling work until the general stock markets hit 7x earnings. Odds are very high that the Dow will still be trading near today’s levels in 2016 but with valuations cut in half again from today!

Going from the bubble top to 14x is the mean reversion, which is now complete for the Dow 30. But just as the crests of LVWs witness extreme overvaluations, their troughs see extreme undervaluations. The second half of the great bear ushers in the dreaded LVW trough, where investors’ morale is crushed and an entire generation completely gives up on stock investing. Sadly the worst is yet to come.
 

Attachments

  • Zeal072108A.jpg
    Zeal072108A.jpg
    77.7 KB · Views: 463
2nd part:

For a rough road map of how the Dow 30 is likely to trade sideways and how its valuations are likely to evolve between now and 2016, we can consider the last LVW trough approach in the 1970s. The second half of that decade saw the same LVW section roll though that we face today. This next chart shows, very clearly, that secular bears do not conveniently end at fair value. They linger on until 7x is seen.

Although this is a chart of the S&P 500, conceptually it is the same for the Dow 30. In fact, over 6 years ago when I first did this long-trading-range analysis I used the Dow 30. All 30 of the elite blue-chip Dow components are also in the S&P 500 (SPX). And these Dow components dominate it too, representing 32% of the entire SPX’s market capitalization but just 6% of its components!



While these are SPX P/E ratios in this chart, they approximate the Dow 30’s pretty well. Since the Dow has much higher quality components on average than the SPX, the Dow’s P/E is usually a bit lower. For example, at the end of June when the Dow’s P/E hit 14.0x, the SPX’s was running at 18.1x. Nevertheless, the general P/E progression lower during secular bears certainly still applies to both indexes.

As you can see here in the SPX, the US stock markets continued drifting sideways on balance throughout the rest of the last secular bear for over 8 years after fair value was reached! 14x in 1974 wasn’t the end, under 7x in 1982 was. While there were big cyclical bulls and bears within this period of time, when all was said and done the markets were dead flat. This gave earnings time to catch up with stock prices and the entire 34-year LVW cycle time to fully run its course.

Since the LVWs slowly oscillate from undervalued levels to overvalued levels and back again, merely hitting fair value isn’t the end. It is only the halfway point in secular bears. This is crucial for investors to know because Wall Street is increasingly claiming that stocks are the cheapest today that they’ve been in decades. While true, this is very misleading and is going to hurt a lot of naïve investors.

14x earnings is definitely cheap compared to the Dow’s 45x in early 2000. But it is still very expensive compared to the 7x seen at the ends of secular bears manifesting in the second half of LVWs. Investors who watch their elite blue-chip stocks drift sideways on balance for 8 more years, taking real losses after inflation, will be devastated. Their portfolios will only be worth a modest fraction of what they could have been if they had understood the LVWs.

So what’s a besieged stock investor to do? Sitting in cash or bonds certainly isn’t the answer. With the Fed doing everything in its power to destroy the US dollar, inflation is only going to accelerate. And with interest rates still not too far above half-century lows, longer-term bonds are going to take a beating as long rates inevitably rise. Odds are the coming 8 years won’t be kind to cash or longer bonds either.

8 years ago I faced this same quandary regarding my own investment capital. I wanted to invest and speculate through the coming secular stock bear. So I studied market history and looked for sectors that performed well in such an environment. The most promising one by far was commodities and the companies that bring them to market. Commodities tend to thrive during secular stock bears, as I wrote way back in April 2001.

Just as these secular stock bears tend to run for 17 years, so do the concurrent secular commodities bulls. While Wall Street loves to call today’s great commodities bull over the moment commodities start pulling back, the probabilities are very high that commodities will continue rallying on balance for another 8 years or so. And elite commodities stocks, with their high profits leverage to commodities prices, should see phenomenal gains.

Although there are times within secular bears when most large commodities stocks get sucked down with general stocks, particularly during the vicious cyclical bears like we’re in today, most of the time they thrive. Investors can not only weather the general stock bear, but earn fortunes to boot, by prudently deploying capital in elite commodities stocks.

And interestingly, it is actually the stock-market LVWs that really help drive these concurrent but inverse cycles in the commodities markets. During great bull markets in stocks, stocks become so sexy that virtually all investment capital gravitates toward stock markets. This starves other realms of much-needed investment. For example back in the late 1990s, everyone wanted to buy junk tech stocks but no one would touch oil producers.

So by the end of the great bull in stocks, the first half of the LVW, commodities infrastructure has been starved of capital investment for at least a decade. Global capacity for producing raw materials is rusting away and not keeping pace with growing global demand. Raw materials just can’t compete for investors’ attention when the general stock markets are hot, leaving inadequate capital investment to handle world demand growth.

By the time the great bear in stocks arrives, the second half of the LVW, commodities prices are gradually starting to rise simply because long-neglected supplies are inadequate. Then contrarian investors, looking for alternatives to thrive through a general-stock bear, start investing in this beaten-down sector. Commodities stocks are driven higher and even commodities themselves eventually become investment destinations.

So the great valuation cycles in the stock markets, by virtue of so powerfully shaping global investment capital flows, heavily influence commodities too. Commodities infrastructure is neglected and left to rust when stocks are sexy. But when stocks start drifting sideways for 17 years, commodities regain favor as an alternative investment and capacity is rebuilt. Everything in the capital markets is interrelated.

The bottom line is even though the Dow 30 just hit fair value, the secular bear is not over. Wall Street will tell you stocks are the cheapest they’ve been in decades, which is true. Nevertheless, valuations still remain twice as high as they ultimately travel at the ends of secular bears. Odds are the stock markets will continue drifting sideways on balance for the next 8 years or so until the Dow 30 actually retreats to 7x earnings.

This is certainly depressing if you are a long-term investor. Watching the markets trade sideways, and taking real losses due to inflation, is no fun at all. Thankfully a secular commodities bull is running concurrently with the secular stock bear. So opportunities to profit abound, both on the long-term investment side and short-term speculation side. There’s no need to totally sit out a secular stock bear.
 

Attachments

  • Zeal072108B.jpg
    Zeal072108B.jpg
    90.1 KB · Views: 470
This quite long (http://www.compareshares.com.au/zeal52.php) but it does pose a method of analysis that I was not familiar with, ie Long Valuation Waves.

Yes, I did read that. It was on several blogs. I don't buy 17 year waves any more than I buy Elliott Waves. Voodoo stuff.

However, the broad concept of "fair value" is reasonable, and the prospect now of several years of stock markets moving downwards as the finance sector blows off value and the consumer goes to sleep is very much part of my outlook. Deflation overall but rising prices for commodities, energy, resources, food. Wealth preservation, but new opportunities in new areas.

Always assuming we survive the financial tsunami headed our way.:eek:
 
Always assuming we survive the financial tsunami headed our way.:eek:

Couldn't agree more. I have no idea about Fibonacci/EW etc but there do seem to be some inherent truths, ie 'fair value' and this can be established using many techniques including FA, TA and pretty much most systems.

I'm quietly optimistic, which some may see as immature, but I do expect an imminent wave of POO (not 'price of oil') which we should survive if the planning's been right. Financials in my portfolio could be sold very soon but I'm going long with stuff that comes out of the ground.

Keep digging. :D
 
from what i think i understand, inflation levels and rates drive PE multipliers

high inflation is accompanied by high interest rates
if you can get 8% on a term deposit then how can PE multipliers be higher than 1/8% = 12.5X

if rates are low say 4% then stocks need to perform at 4% return or higher to get your money... so 1/4% = 25X, or 1/3% = 33X

does this make any sense to anyone else?
 
from what i think i understand, inflation levels and rates drive PE multipliers

high inflation is accompanied by high interest rates
if you can get 8% on a term deposit then how can PE multipliers be higher than 1/8% = 12.5X

if rates are low say 4% then stocks need to perform at 4% return or higher to get your money... so 1/4% = 25X, or 1/3% = 33X

does this make any sense to anyone else?

You should factor in risk premium.
 
The global economy is at the point of maximum danger

The global economy is at the point of maximum danger

By Ambrose Evans- Pritchard
Last Updated: 6:53am BST 21/07/2008


Have your say Read comments

It feels like the summer of 1931. The world's two biggest financial institutions have had a heart attack. The global currency system is breaking down. The policy doctrines that got us into this mess are bankrupt. No world leader seems able to discern the problem, let alone forge a solution.

The International Monetary Fund has abdicated into schizophrenia. It has upgraded its 2008 world forecast from 3.7pc to 4.1pc growth, whilst warning of a "chance of a global recession". Plainly, the IMF cannot or will not offer any useful insights.

Its "mean-reversion" model misses the entire point of this crisis, which is that central banks have pushed debt to fatal levels by holding interest too low for a generation, and now the chickens have come home to roost. True "mean-reversion" would imply debt deflation on such a scale that would, if abrupt, threaten democracy.

advertisement
The risk is that these same central banks will commit a fresh error, this time overreacting to the oil spike. The European Central Bank has raised rates, warning of a 1970s wage-price spiral. Fixated on the rear-view mirror, it is not looking through the windscreen.

More Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
More on economics
The eurozone is falling into recession before the US itself. Its level of credit stress is worse, if measured by Euribor or the iTraxx bond indexes. Core inflation has fallen over the last year from 1.9pc to 1.8pc.

The US may soon tip into a second leg of this crisis as the fiscal package runs out and Americans lose jobs in earnest. US bank credit has contracted for three months. Real US wages fell at almost 10pc (annualised) over May and June. This is a ferocious squeeze for an economy already in the grip of the property and debt crunch.

No doubt the rescue of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - $5.3 trillion pillars of America's mortgage market - stinks of moral hazard. The Treasury is to buy shares: the Fed has opened its window yet wider. Risks have been socialised. Any rewards will go to capitalists.

Alas, no Scandinavian discipline for Wall Street. When Norway's banks fell below critical capital levels in the early 1990s, the Storting authorised seizure. Shareholders were stiffed.

But Nordic purism in the vast universe of US credit would court fate. The Californian lender IndyMac was indeed seized after depositors panicked on the streets of Encino. The police had to restore order. This was America's Northern Rock moment.

IndyMac will deplete a tenth of the $53bn reserve of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The FDIC has some 90 "troubled" lenders on watch. IndyMac was not one of them.

The awful reality is that Washington has its back to the wall. Fed chief Ben Bernanke thought the US could always get out of trouble by monetary stimulus "à l'outrance", and letting the dollar slide. He has learned that the world is a more complicated place.

Oil has queered the pitch. So has America's fatal reliance on foreign debt. The Fannie/Freddie rescue, incidentally, has just lifted the US national debt from German 'AAA' levels to Italian 'AA-' levels.

China, Russia, petro-powers and other foreign states own $985bn of US agency debt, besides holdings of US Treasuries. Purchases of Fannie/Freddie debt covered a third of the US current account deficit of $700bn over the last year. Alex Patelis from Merrill Lynch says America faces the risk of a "financing crisis" within months. Foreigners have a veto over US policy.

Japan did not have this problem during its Lost Decade. As the world's supplier of credit, it could let the yen slide. It also had a savings rate of 15pc. Albert Edwards from Société Générale says this has fallen to 3pc today. It has cushioned the slump. Americans are under water before they start.

My view is that a dollar crash will be averted as it becomes clearer that contagion has spread worldwide. But we are now at the point of maximum danger. Britain, Japan, and the Antipodes are stalling. Denmark is in recession. Germany contracted in the second quarter. May industrial output fell 6pc in Holland and 5.5pc in Sweden.

The coalitions in Belgium and Austria have just collapsed. Germany's left-right team is fraying. One German banker told me that the doctrines of "left Nazism" (Otto Strasser's group, purged by Hitler) had captured the rising Die Linke party. The Social Democrats are picking up its themes to protect their flank.

This is the healthy part of Europe. Further south, we are not far away from civic protest. BNP Paribas has just issued a hurricane alert for Spain.

Finance minister Pedro Solbes said Spain is facing the "most complex" economic crisis in its history. Actually, it is very simple. The country was lulled into a trap by giveaway interest rates of 2pc under EMU, leading to a current account deficit of 10pc of GDP.

A manic property bubble was funded by foreigners buying covered bonds and securities. This market has dried up. Monetary policy is now being tightened into the crunch by the ECB, hence the bankruptcy last week of Martinsa-Fadesa (€5.1bn). With Franco-era labour markets (70pc of wages are inflation-linked), the adjustment will occur through closure of the job marts.

China, India, East Europe and emerging Asia have all stolen growth from the future by condoning credit excess. To varying degrees, they are now being forced to pay back their own "inter-temporal overdrafts".

If we are lucky, America will start to stabilise before Asia goes down. Should our leaders mismanage affairs, almost every part of the global system will go down together. Then we are in trouble.
 
So the financials went up 2.8% on opening and finished the day 1% down.Profit taking?Selling on the rally?Knowing that the banks are using poor accounting methods with the backing of the Fed and SEC who don't want any further crises on their hands?
Still a good rally considering they went up 11.4% last week.
Retailers having a harder time getting credit indicates there is concern about the strength and/or sustainability of retail spending. Also note that Wal-Maryt -- the largest retailer in the world -- had to agree to tighter lending controls. This is a company with 378 billion in revenue last year. They have to agree to stricter lending standards.

This is why last week's euphoria regarding the financial sector was so completely overblown. Everyone was thrilled because several banks reported losses that weren't as large as feared. That was the good news -- banks didn't lose as much money as projected. Yet they still lost lots of money and wrote down lots of debt. And all of those writedowns are starting to crimp lending.

Much of the decline in outstanding credit has been due to banks sharply reducing the amount of bonds and other debt securities held on their books, but the slowdown is apparent across all forms of lending. The heavy losses banks have taken on mortgage-related securities are forcing them raise cash levels, leading to tighter lending. Because they can't know what other problems might be lurking on their balance sheets, they are being especially cautious.


None of this should be surprising to anyone. We have seen over $400 billion dollars in writedowns. We have seen 266 mortgage lenders shut their doors. All of this is bound to have an impact -- which it has in the discount spread
Also note that LIBOR is still higher than the discount rate.

Ladies and gentlemen -- anyone that is recommending you move into financial shares is an idiot. There are still major problems out there. Credit standards are tightening and loans are getting harder to come by even though the Fed has (again) lowered interest rates to 0% after adjusting for inflation. None of this is good news

http://www.bonddad.blogspot.com/

Strong words from a blogger who usually tries to look on the "bright side" of things in the markets.
 
if you can get 8% on a term deposit then how can PE multipliers be higher than 1/8% = 12.5X

Broadly yes, although you need to add the proper risk premium. The condition for investing in shares is:

Forward P/E < 1/(Riskless return + risk premium)

Which implies a forward P/E no more than 1/(7.25% + 2-3%) or about 10.

Banks are close to that on historical P/E, but they are going to take a profit hit, so the price is still too high on forward P/E. Even BHP is at 13, which is too high.
 
Broadly yes, although you need to add the proper risk premium. The condition for investing in shares is:

Forward P/E < 1/(Riskless return + risk premium)

Which implies a forward P/E no more than 1/(7.25% + 2-3%) or about 10.

Banks are close to that on historical P/E, but they are going to take a profit hit, so the price is still too high on forward P/E. Even BHP is at 13, which is too high.
Do you think 2-3% risk premium is enough in the current environment?
 
Which implies a forward P/E no more than 1/(7.25% + 2-3%) or about 10.

It seems you are saying that a P/E of 14 is not valid in the current environment. Does that mean a P/E of 7 will eventually come into play, as the article I included a few days ago indicated?

Ps- I hope I'm wrong.
 
It seems you are saying that a P/E of 14 is not valid in the current environment. Does that mean a P/E of 7 will eventually come into play, as the article I included a few days ago indicated?

Ps- I hope I'm wrong.

While I'm definitely not an expert in this area, I think there is a possibility of P/E 7 some time in the future. I would imagine that most mainstream investors would be too scared to put money into the market again for a very long time to come, after seeing their investments going down by 1/4 of their value. The thing is though, money will eventually have to go somewhere. While some of these might go into the more conservative options (e.g. savings/deposits), some of this money would probably be spent on life's little luxuries rather than being saved/invested. So, I'm guessing that, as the economy fixes itself up in the next few years, people will spend more money, but will not be investing as much. (Again, I'm mostly referring to the mainstream "investors".) When people spend more, company profits go up, and since people would still be afraid of putting money into the market, the share prices remain depressed, and the P/E gets pushed down. This will continue to happen until eventually, one day, people realise that "oh, we are spending all these money into such-and-such companies, they must be making tons of money. If I put money into them, it will make me loads!"

Well, I don't have prove, but that's how I think things happen. :2twocents
 
The market's a funny place at the moment.:eek:

We all should be happy, except the shorters, that the market is up >2.5% but I just get that feeling it means it has further to fall again later. There wasn't that 'bottom feel' (feel free to post dirty comments on the Joke thread :)) at ~4800.

False hope abounds with the US printing money. I was just watching the lunchtime news and Zimbabwe has put into circulation a 100 Billion Dollar note, you can buy 2 loaves of bread with it. Their inflation rate is 100,000%.

:eek:1.00 AUD = 18,137,512,578.22 ZWD:eek:
 
Update:

1.00 AUD = 18,137,104,876.31 ZWD

The ZWD is strengthening, quick run out and get some. :rolleyes:
 
It seems you are saying that a P/E of 14 is not valid in the current environment. Does that mean a P/E of 7 will eventually come into play, as the article I included a few days ago indicated?

I guess it's possible. Given that the ASX P/E as a whole is now 10.67 and there are earnings downgrades to be expected, that would have the market drop another 1000 points or more. Lovely!

No, a 2-3% risk premium is not enough for me right now. I'm waiting for the next round of bad news and to get past Sep/Oct before I start getting too interested.
 
anyone remember the simpsons episode where homer tries to stop bart from jumping a huge canyon on his skateboard and ends up falling in himself?.. and instead of falling straight to the bottom (road runner V coyote style) he bounces off every ledge on the way down (usually on his head)..

kinda like the markets lately..
 
Excerpts from an interesting article by Mike Shedlock entitled "You know the banking system is unsound when..."
9. The SEC issued a protective order to protect those most responsible for naked short selling. As long as the investment banks and brokers were making money engaging in naked shorting of stocks, there was no problem. However, when the bears began using the tactic against the big financials, it became time to selectively enforce the existing regulation.

10. The Fed takes emergency actions twice during options expirations week in regards to the discount window and rate cuts.

11. The SEC takes emergency action during options expirations week regarding short sales
13. Citigroup (C), Lehman (LEH), Morgan Stanley(MS), Goldman Sachs (GS) and Merrill Lynch (MER) all have a huge percentage of level 3 assets. Level 3 assets are commonly known as "marked to fantasy" assets. In other words, the value of those assets is significantly if not ridiculously overvalued in comparison to what those assets would fetch on the open market. It is debatable if any of the above firms survive in their present form. Some may not survive in any form.

14. Bernanke openly solicits private equity firms to invest in banks. Is this even close to a remotely normal action for Fed chairman to take
19. Bank of America (BAC) agreed to take over Countywide Financial (CFC) and twice announced Countrywide will add profits to B of A. Inquiring minds were asking "How the hell can Countrywide add to Bank of America earnings?" Here's how. Bank of America just announced it will not guarantee $38.1 billion in Countrywide debt. Questions over "Fraudulent Conveyance" are now surfacing.
24. There is roughly $6.84 Trillion in bank deposits. $2.60 Trillion of that is uninsured. There is only $53 billion in FDIC insurance to cover $6.84 Trillion in bank deposits. Indymac will eat up roughly $8 billion of that.

25. Of the $6.84 Trillion in bank deposits, the total cash on hand at banks is a mere $273.7 Billion. Where is the rest of the loot? The answer is in off balance sheet SIVs, imploding commercial real estate deals, Alt-A liar loans, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds, toggle bonds where debt is amazingly paid back with more debt, and all sorts of other silly (and arguably fraudulent) financial wizardry schemes that have bank and brokerage firms leveraged at 30-1 or more. Those loans cannot be paid back.

What cannot be paid back will be defaulted on. If you did not know it before, you do now. The entire US banking system is insolvent
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/07/you-know-banking-system-is-unsound-when.html
 
Top