- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,125
- Reactions
- 12,752
Now that Thorpedo has come out of the closet, it seems a good time to ask whether our treatment and adulation over his success would have been muted if we knew he was gay at the time. Ian himself obvious thought that would be the case.
I think there is a preference for "real men" and "real women" as our sporting heroes, people who we can hold up as representing the majority of the population and the lifestyle most of us enjoy.
Sad as it is, I think Ian was right to supress his sexuality while he was competing. He has already rewritten the record books with his performances and now he is out of the limelight it was time to set up the record on his personal life.
It is reported Thorpe was paid a whopping $400,000 for his televised confessional, part of a wider deal with Network Ten which will see the five-time Olympic medallist work as a commentator for the upcoming Compmonwealth Games.ork Ten
Zzzz...zzzz....zzzzzzzzzzzz
1. As if we all didn't know.
2. Why is this any of our business?
3. Why is this front page news?
Zzzz...zzzz....zzzzzzzzzzzz
1. As if we all didn't know.
2. Why is this any of our business?
3. Why is this front page news?
It's probably easy to be "open and generous" about Ian Thorpe being gay in 2014.
How would we have reacted if he came out as a 17 year old Australian swimming star ? I suppose the relevant question is "How should we treat other sporting identities as they develop their careers ?"
It was probably one of the most boring interviews Parkinson ever did. Even Parkinson couldn't elicit anything intelligent, interesting or witty out of Thorpe. For that go back 40 years for his interview with Orson Welles.
Personally I'm looking forward to a future where it's not front page news when someone famous says they're gay. That should indicate that society has moved on from tolerance to pretty much complete acceptance, because it's no longer an "issue". It's just the way it is.
We all knew Matthew Mitcham was gay when he was competing and I don't think it made any difference. As it happens, I didn't know Kawolski was gay anyway. Seriously the care factor over people's sexual preferences is nil for the majority of people I think.
Agreed but I'm looking forward when it's not even anyone else's business either. Why should a gay person have to declare their sexuality anyway? Can't wait for the day there is no closet and no hiding is needed.
Why should a gay person have to declare their sexuality anyway? .
1. A lot of people had suspicions, but only he and his intimates would know for sure
2. Ian Thorpe decided to make it our business by going on national tv.
3. Because the interview was with Michael Parkinson.
Zzzz...zzzz....zzzzzzzzzzzz
1. As if we all didn't know.
The questions were rhetorical Horace
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?