Whiskers
It's a small world
- Joined
- 21 August 2007
- Posts
- 3,266
- Reactions
- 1
Bingo....I'm with whiskers on this one.
Also, most tradesmen that do any electrical work on domestic propperties, have to hold the appropriate qualifications, & also usually are a member of the ETU.
I know the ETU looks after its members, but they also don't tolerate 'shonks' very easily iether.
If this person wasn't an ETU member, then ask them [union] about this person, & what procedures should've been adheared too...If he did something wrong [yes] then the ETU boy's could make his life hell, in regards to 'shonky' workmanship.
Vicki
I'm not too familiar with the workings of pools or the qualifications trades people need to work on them, but yes, it would seem that a Qld BSA number and Part 51A Swimming pool construction, installation and maintenance licence is required and should be quoted on the Invoice http://www.bsa.qld.gov.au/BuildersContractors/LicensingInformation/Pages/WhenisaLicenceRequired.aspx and the legislation link http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/Q/QldBuildSerR03.pdf#page=22)
I'm not a lawyer so check like phoning the BSA first to see if this business ought to be licenced under the BSA. If so, and if not shown on invoice then certainly include that in the letter of demand to withdraw their invoice.
The BSA has a complaints link on their web page and would investigate fairly quickly and put some restrictions on their licence or cancell outright for a period or permenantly if serious enough. If there are licence or work standard issues, get that addressed at the BSA first, then proceed to the Small Claims Court to recover money, eg void the invoice, if necessary.
I agree with Whiskers too, Julia.
When I first read your post, the issue of unlawful entry crossed my mind. Whiskers certainly has a way with words...
Maybe also include your concern with flooding as you stated in your post in case you choose to go further, it shows that they were also somewhat negligent with the forecast heavy rains and potential flooding to the house with their unauthorised removal of your chlorinator:
What do you think, Whiskers?
Yes, certainly it's good to highlight forseeable damage that had a high probability of happening.
The key to this type of letter is that when the other party has demonstrated some bad faith, and you feel you are not being dealt with reasonably then you need to get your information organised, workout the legal status and consider the best remedy for you... then drive it home hard. State the undisputable facts, law and deadlines concisely with clear demands eg, withdraw Invoice for return of timer.
Acting in bad (or good) Faith, Reasonableness and Mitigation (of losses, circumstances etc) are three principles that a court consider heavily when judging a case like this.
I generally find this sort of response works well with 'Overservicing' issues, ie where mechanics, contractors etc who bill you for more work than you asked for and or orthorised and or is reasonably required, as well as for customers who do not pay their accounts as agreed