did I mis read this (maybe u meant tax on the income being produced whilst capital remains in the fund?) I maintain that the capital held in super has already has been taxed as income years earlier. And thus should be exempt from income tax when drawn down out of the fund.
As I understand it super contributions are only taxed at 15% , so the full marginal tax on those inputs has not been paid, so maybe a discounted tax rate on earnings could apply.
Australia has had no recession for over 20 years (not that its entirely good thing).So this situation exists in all but 3 of the countries in the world without dividend imputation and they accept it as a fact of life.
One of only 2 countries I think. Maybe we have it right and everyone else has it wrong.
So this situation exists in all but 3 of the countries in the world without dividend imputation and they accept it as a fact of life.
They generally have lower tax rates for dividends, eg in the USA tax on dividends is limited to 15%.
Also, that is a reason why in countries such as the USA dividends are quite small, with most companies preferring to buy back stock instead of pay dividends.
It's a big factor in why Berkshire Hathaway hasn't paid a dividend in 50 years.
So how is this a benefit to shareholders ?
hat a benefit?
The fact that a company hasn't paid a dividend in 50 years.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.