I dont see any evidence of this but what i do see is indiscriminate lending by banks and people buying properties they cannot afford. For instance there is a lot of talk in Perth atm about the average person being unable to afford to buy a home. This is bs im afraid, despite the median price approaching 500,000 there are still many properties for sale under 250,000, are they 4x2's in desirable locations? No, the people getting into trouble as in the last slump in the early 80s are people that have over borrowed. Anyone who cant do simple arithmetic to work out what they can really afford should not be contemplating buying property.But will the conditions of the last 5 years likely be repeated? Will we really get to the point where interest alone takes 100% of average pay and home buyers with a mortgage don't eat? Do the math and it's seriously scary...
Of course, the classic cop out when asked to give evidence "just read all my posts" LolThere is nearly 1500 posts in this thread. You need not wait as, I repeat, I have written extensively... as have others. Read the thread.
That wasnt your quote,have you forgotten already what you posted? Let me remind youSo a man and/or woman who is/are gainfully employed should not be able to afford a modest house? Interesting.... and revealing.
I think you have forgotten the basis of our economy is capitalism and not socialism. There is no stigma to renting, home ownership should be for people who wish to work hard and achieve not for someone that just wants to be comfortable.A working slob should be able to comfortably afford a mortgage on a modest house
Cognitive DissonanceI dont see any evidence of this but what i do see is indiscriminate lending by banks and people buying properties they cannot afford. For instance there is a lot of talk in Perth atm about the average person being unable to afford to buy a home. This is bs im afraid, despite the median price approaching 500,000 there are still many properties for sale under 250,000, are they 4x2's in desirable locations? No, the people getting into trouble as in the last slump in the early 80s are people that have over borrowed. Anyone who cant do simple arithmetic to work out what they can really afford should not be contemplating buying property.
Still waiting for your reasoning as to why house prices wont go up in Perth.
and I do not agree with your statement here
Of course, the classic cop out when asked to give evidence "just read all my posts" Lol
Let me introduce you to the concept of metaphor.That wasnt your quote,have you forgotten already what you posted? Let me remind you
I think you have forgotten the basis of our economy is capitalism and not socialism. There is no stigma to renting, home ownership should be for people who wish to work hard and achieve not for someone that just wants to be comfortable.
Please show where exactly in this thread you posted argument or substantive debate as to why house prices in Perth will not rise and I might perhaps see your point. Simply asking someone to search for evidence of your statements through your previous postings is not much of an argument.No, the classic cop out is not reading what is already posted. Why should anyone duplicate what is already in the thread? You are using silly arguments.
My reference was to your use of the word "comfortably", obviously that was not evident to you. There is no splitting hairs, either you posted a statement or you didnt. Either you can back up your statements or you cant, I am still waiting for your reasoned argument. Should I post examples of your posts to try and find one?Let me introduce you to the concept of metaphor.
Working (gainfully employed) slob(average guy)
These post where people start spitting hairs to be argumentative are tiresome. Reasoned argument please. I do not want to have to start culling posts here.
I dont see any evidence of this but what i do see is indiscriminate lending by banks and people buying properties they cannot afford. For instance there is a lot of talk in Perth atm about the average person being unable to afford to buy a home. This is bs im afraid, despite the median price approaching 500,000 there are still many properties for sale under 250,000, are they 4x2's in desirable locations? No, the people getting into trouble as in the last slump in the early 80s are people that have over borrowed. Anyone who cant do simple arithmetic to work out what they can really afford should not be contemplating buying property.
Vizard's mansion sets sale record of more than $18m
http://www.theage.com.au/news/natio...ets-sale-record/2007/05/28/1180205160419.html
DISGRACED businessman Steve Vizard has sold his palatial Toorak mansion for more than $18 million as real estate records continue to tumble for Melbourne's trophy homes.
"It's not a triple-A Toorak address," he said. "Your Triple-A addresses are more your boulevards like Albany, St Georges, Irving; this (Orrong) is a busy road."
Mr Morrell said demand was strong for luxury property.
"The top end at the moment seems to have no boundaries; it's a classic case of undersupply of quality products."
I remember when Laurie Connell bought at the top of the last boom. Bought several blocks in Peppermint grove to demolish and build his palace. At the same time he developed his Bedfordale propertyhello,
the guy who bought vizard's house must be the biggest fool ever going by the majority of the post's here
they are about to wipe out 9 or so million aren't they?
those with coin keep getting in, amazing stuff
thankyou
robots
hello,
any ASF members buy in the last bust?
any ASF members lose out in the last bust?
thankyou
robots
I personally know a lot of people who lost their @ss. Connell was at my 21st birthday. I know plenty of the St Georges Tce corporate cowboys of the era.hello,
any ASF members buy in the last bust?
any ASF members lose out in the last bust?
thankyou
robots
The bust was early 90's and yes I know plenty that lost lot's.hello,
you should re-read my posts kimosabi, I have never written, commented or denied anything about a boom or a bust, I have continually said that the good property is solid as
and challenge you to refute that
wayneL you mention high fliers and prop developers but what about the average joe holding one or two properties, thats what I would like to hear about?
in my case I had a unit in Elsternwick (suburb of Melb, nice 2-bed), mortgage of 70k, in 1986, didnt really think much of things at the time except I new I had to pay my mortgage
thankyou
robots
THE residential property slump is likely to last longer than initially predicted, with developers now saying building activity will probably not pick up for at least another few years.
Housing slump longer than predicted - The Australian, May 29th, 2007.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?