- Joined
- 17 January 2007
- Posts
- 2,986
- Reactions
- 32
Interest rates are the major factor.
Beej
Unemployment is THE major factor. If you don't have a job interest rates don't mean much to you.
Interest rates are the major factor.
Beej
Unemployment is THE major factor. If you don't have a job interest rates don't mean much to you.
Unemployment is THE major factor. If you don't have a job interest rates don't mean much to you.
bingo
Low interest rates are what fueled this bubble in the first place, somehow sometime soon it will all become clear.
Massive unemployment will counter the interest rate factor and prices will fall, the catalyst will be the end of the doubling of the FHBG, until then there will be a frenzy of activity to get in before the end of June, if Rudd continues the bribe he will go down like Whitlam in a flurry of incompetence.
Discussed ad nauseum here over the past few pages. You believe that if you like, but historically rising unemployment actually has not had much of an impact on house prices at all - certainly far less than the property bears here are expecting. The last major boom (1999) started while unemployment was 7%. From 1991-1993 the unemployment rate rose to 11% yet median property prices increased over that period. Go figure!
Beej
But Mr Burns you seem to be forgetting that the FHBG was started by your heroes Mr Howard and Mr Costello all the way back in 2000!!! Were they incompetent as well or do you only use that label for Labor politicians? Me I think they are all equally capable of incompetence, whatever the political flavour Come June all that will happen is the boost to the grant will be removed. I reckon they might even keep it for new houses. If this happens how would that fit in with your "forecast"??
Cheers,
Beej
um maybe have a look at the income verses mortgage size around that time to m8 , maybe you may notice the multiples were a tad less
Not in Sydney so much: 1992 median house price $180k, average full time wage $30k. Multiple = 6x. Current Sydney median house price $525k, average full time wage $65k (latest ABS stats), multiple = 8x. Interest rates in 1992 - 10%. Interest rates now - 5.x%.
So the multiples are not that different. If you consider the different inflation and interest rate environments, plus consider total HOUSEHOLD income rather than just a full time single income, then your point becomes quite moot.
Cheers,
Beej
um sydney is not a whole country , but what i can remember is a different story when it came to buying in perth and melbourne........ a lot less of a multiple compared to now ..
Yes well houses used to be cheap in big country towns. Then they grow into cities like Sydney, and they get expensive, and stay that way..... hope you didn't miss the boat!
Cheers,
Beej
Yes well houses used to be cheap in big country towns. Then they grow into cities like Sydney, and they get expensive, and stay that way..... hope you didn't miss the boat!
Cheers,
Beej
LOL spoken like a gold Coast property developer, from the poorhouse.
now that was a very immature post beej and had completely nothing to do with the point at hand .
i did well actually
Beej effectively 91-93 was part of the last "boom" in house prices prior to the most recent one in the 2000's. But after 1993 house prices went backwards and then sideways for between 6-10 years depending upon where you live. Not only that rent peaked in 1993 in many places and then went down to sidesays for quite a few years.
hello,
good evening, just back from tennis tonite (close match, two sets to one Robots way at end)
wow, my money renting rate is going down again, this is amazing
and people suggest getting out of debt, hahahaha
another reduction, paradise
I wonder if Rudd can fix the internet in the UK as well?
thankyou
robots
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.